Alyssa Farah Griffin Giggles Over 'Crazy Woke 1' — Forgets the Jobs and...
Scott Galloway Says Gavin Newsom Will Be Dems’ 2028 Presidential Pick for All...
Banner Year, Guys: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Owns the Democrats Simply by Describing Their...
Abigail Spanberger Claims She Had the BEST TIME at Old Fiddler's Convention (We...
What Is She UP to: Hillary Clinton Tries Pushing ANOTHER Trump Lie on...
CNN Hosts Triggered by Trump's Escape From Iranian Threat
The Barbarians Are at the Gates. And the Stakes Have Never Been Higher.
AWKWARD! Sooo ... ABOUT Those 'Republicans for Talarico'? Yeah, RIP to THAT Campaign...
WI Dem Explains WHY He's 'Unironically' Likely Voting R for Gov With DISTURBING...
Won't Someone PLEASE Think About the REPORTERS?! Jake Tapper Hits ALL New Self-Awareness...
Royce White Is Being Misgendered and It Needs to Stop RIGHT NOW
Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons Explaining How SECURITY Works to CNN...
WOW: Abdul El-Sayed Deliberately Hid a WHOLE LOT About Himself From Voters (Scrubbed...
Brandon Gill Drops a Whole Lotta OH HELL NO on AOC Trying to...
Former Daily Caller Employee Shares DAMNING Story of Finding Emails Tucker Carlson Sent...

'They INVERTED Animal Farm': Walter Kirn Calls Out Hollywood's (and Wikipedia's) Orwell Revisionism

Meme screenshot

Wikipedia has been in the news recently after Elon Musk debuted his new AI-based alternative, Grokipedia. Of course, the extremely left-biased Wikipedia base can't withstand any challenge to its false authority (kind of like most far-left institutions), so it and Wired magazine immediately ran with hit pieces against Musk's new venture, labeling it as a repository for 'far-right talking points.' 

Advertisement

Of course, this type of propaganda doesn't work anymore, particularly when it comes from Wikipedia, a site filled with left-wing lies about most topics. Accordingly, most people, including author Walter Kirn, promptly ignored that agitprop and recommended Grokipedia as a much better resource tool. 

That is the biggest lie about Wikipedia: that it is entirely user-based. In truth, it is controlled by leftist editors who do not allow anything that goes against their agenda. 

One user responded to Kirn with a hilarious example of Wikipedia's deception, citing the entry for George Orwell's famous book, Animal Farm. 

Or, more precisely, the new 2025 movie that is ... ahem ... 'based on' that book. 

Wait ... Animal Farm is an anti-capitalist allegory? Seriously? 

Ha. 

Haha. 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. 

Kirn couldn't believe his eyes, responding -- accurately -- that this description doesn't just get it wrong; it gets it 180 degrees wrong. 

Advertisement

It's as hilariously ironic as when Kirn and Matt Taibbi noticed that the 75th anniversary edition of Orwell's 1984 contained an introduction providing 'trigger warnings.' 

If people can roll their eyes from beyond the grave, Orwell's are certainly spinning into the back of his head. 

LOL. 

Yes, we're sure Stalin loved that Serkis and Wikipedia removed all references to his bloody, ruthless regime in Animal Farm. 

Pretty much, yeah. 

The Ministry of Truth would be so proud. 

To be fair, Wikipedia might not be totally to blame here, since the new animated film from Andy Serkis does betray the true meaning and message of Orwell's novella.

But the fact that Wikipedia contains no reference to this obvious inversion is enough of an indictment of the platform all by itself. 

Grokipedia was happy to provide a much better, more thorough, and accurate description

While praised for its animation and vocal performances, the adaptation has drawn criticism for prioritizing broad appeal over the novella's prophetic warnings against collectivism's pitfalls, potentially rendering its cautionary message less resonant in an era where such allegories remain empirically relevant to real-world authoritarian drifts.

Advertisement

Wow. What a 'far-right' explanation. LOL. 

It's a bit trite to label everything 'Orwellian,' but -- whoo, boy -- if anything qualifies as that, this does. 

Hmm ... what could that word be? 

HA! 

Simply Inception-like layers of irony. 

Technically, the most Stalinist thing ever would be to burn all copies of the original Animal Farm and murder anyone who owned one. 

But we don't think Serkis or Wikipedia could get away with that much irony. 

Advertisement

As Kirn noted in his original post, the best course of action is not to rely too much on resource tools like Wikipedia OR Grokipedia. 

But if we had to choose one right now, we'd go with the one that uses 'far-right talking points.'

============================================

Related:

The 'Dolls' Are MEN: JK Rowling Blasts Glamour Magazine's Male 'Women' of the Year

THIS Is Abi Spanberger's Party: Virginia House Speaker SILENCES Delegate Speaking Against Violence

JD Vance Reminds America What It Feels Like to Have a REAL Vice President With TPUSA Q and A

'So, It Begins': Homeland Security Channels JRR Tolkien for Its Latest Recruitment Effort

Then and Now: Gavin Newsom Displays His Cowardice by Denying His Son's Love for Charlie Kirk

Editor's Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos