Haley Stevens Comes Out SWINGING on X and OOF, Punches Definitely Land As Lefties Just Can't DEEEAL

Nov 03, 2026 8:25 AM
Advertisement
Haley Stevens Comes Out SWINGING on X and OOF, Punches Definitely Land As Lefties Just Can't DEEEAL
Robin Buckson/Detroit News via AP, Pool

We get that Haley Stevens is still a Democrat even if her own party refuses to accept her, and as such, we likely disagree on just about everything. HOWEVER, the fact she is willing to call out socialism and most of all antisemitism in her own party and vote alongside Mike Rogers tells us that even if we disagree, there are still a few things we agree on.

Advertisement

Over the past two days, Stevens has been the subject of CRAZY abuse, from the very people who are supposed to support her. Sexist, gross, ugly smears flung at her, equating her to a used condom, calling her vermin, trash, and a traitor. And who could forget the claims that her fiancé is abusive and controlling her ... those are the most damaging in this editor's humble opinion.

Finally, Stevens herself came out with an article on X and the way the Left is screeching (even in Community Notes) tells us it all landed.

Here's her post:

My decision to withdraw my endorsement of Abdul El-Sayed and support Mike Rogers has angered many Democrats. I understand why. But it was not impulsive, and it was not made for me by anyone else. It was a decision of conscience.

I am a proud Democrat and believe in a woman’s right to choose, in organized labor, in opportunity for working families, and in making government work for ordinary people. None of that has changed. I believe that no one making under $70,000 should pay any Federal Income Tax. We should have fixed rate utility bills. And every person in this country gets healthcare.

After losing the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate, I did what I believed was right. Despite deep disappointment - mine and that of the thousands of people who worked so hard for our campaign - I endorsed Abdul. I put the party first and hoped we could move forward together.

Instead, I was shut out. The endorsement was welcomed; the people behind it seemed to be forgotten. There was little effort to listen to the voters who supported me or bridge the real disagreements our primary had exposed. I was prepared to accept that. I had work to do serving Michigan, and I didn’t need a role in anyone else’s campaign.

Then came the ads. One, from a group supporting Abdul, tied the cost of groceries to America’s support for Israel. Another, from Abdul’s own campaign, featured Tucker Carlson, whose racist and anti-Black rhetoric has no place in a Democratic campaign. I heard directly from Black voters, Jewish voters, and others about how deeply these messages hurt. They deserved to be heard, not dismissed. Reasonable people can disagree about Israel, Gaza, and American foreign policy. But blaming Israel for the price of eggs and elevating Tucker Carlson are not the way to build trust or bring people together. 

Abdul chose to campaign alongside Hasan Piker, whose rhetoric about Jewish Americans has been deeply disturbing. He took Piker to college campuses to tell our youth that Iran is not our enemy. Just days ago, Piker compared efforts to win over Jewish voters in West Bloomfield to canvassing a KKK neighborhood. 

Abdul condemned those remarks, but his decision to embrace Piker in the first place raised serious questions about his judgment and his ability to bring people together. I asked Abdul to reject that rhetoric clearly. I wasn’t asking him to change his platform. I was offering him an opportunity to reassure people, reject division, and demonstrate the leadership required of a United States Senator. He ultimately said he disagreed with the outside ad. 

I welcomed that. 

But by then, I had also been told I was no longer welcome at his campaign events. That experience raised a bigger question. If a candidate cannot make room for people who supported his primary opponent, how will he represent an entire state filled with people who disagree with him? Some critics have also dragged my fiancé into this, suggesting he or others must have made my decision for me. 

Think about what that says. 

A woman can serve in Congress, run statewide, and fight for her convictions, and still be told that when she makes a choice people dislike, someone else must be pulling the strings. That is sexism dressed up as political analysis. My fiancé has his own views. I have mine. I made this decision, and I am proud of it. 

Do not question my independence simply because you disagree with my conclusion. Endorsing a Republican is no small thing. Mike Rogers and I disagree on many things. But Michigan has to elect a senator and there is no neutral choice that absolves me of responsibility. Once I concluded that Abdul El-Sayed is not fit to serve in the United States Senate, I had to confront who should. I chose Mike Rogers, with the hope that he can serve in the tradition of John McCain: a senator willing to put country before party and stand up to his own side when conscience requires it. What has troubled me almost as much as this experience is my party’s reaction.

Instead of asking why a lifelong Democrat reached this point, some leaders rushed to condemn me, question my motives, and push me out. That response reveals something deeply troubling about what is missing in today’s Democratic Party. 

We cannot preach inclusion while punishing dissent. We cannot promise to heal a divided country if we cannot tolerate disagreement among ourselves. And we cannot build a lasting majority by making Americans feel their concerns are unwelcome. Loyalty to a party should never require abandoning your values or judgment. 

I respect Democrats who disagree with my decision and ask for the same respect in return. I still believe in the promise of the Democratic Party. But fulfilling that promise will require something more than loyalty tests and demands for blind obedience. 

It will require true leadership. Leaders who listen, even when it is uncomfortable. Leaders who stand against hatred without calculating the political cost. Leaders who understand that bringing people together is more important than forcing them into line. 

There is healing to be done in Michigan, in our party, and in our country. We can build a stronger, more welcoming, more courageous Democratic Party. 

And I plan to help lead that effort.

Advertisement

Perfectly said. No notes.

============================================================

Related:

What PANIC Looks Like: Mary Peltola Throws Campaign Staff Under the Bus in Fake Dan Sullivan Scheme

Harry Sisson DROPPED for Attacking Haley Stevens by ... Harry Sisson. Over and OVER Again. (PICS)

Frodo Can SUCK IT: Elijah Wood Shaming Haley Stevens Blows UP in His Creepy Little Hobbit FACE

Don't Be Stupid. VOTE RED Because Democrats Will WRECK and RUIN Everything. Seriously.

With Friends Like This A-HOLE, Who Needs Enemies? Haley Stevens 'Pal' WHOOPED for Trashing Her on X

============================================================

Editor's Note: The Democrat Party has been infected by socialism, and it's spreading FAST. Democrats are claiming there's nothing to worry about, but we know the truth.

Help us continue to shine a light on the socialist takeover by joining Twitchy VIP.  Use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.

Comments

VIP

Join the Conversation

VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos