'Legit Funny'! Jim Acosta Says Free Speech Is at Risk (and Tries to...
Hillary Clinton Explains Why Ghislaine Maxwell Was at Her Daughter's Wedding (Then Avoids...
Rep Plays 'Didn't Know About That' Card When Pinned Down About Epstein Files...
A Stitt Storm: Oklahoma Governor Under Fire for Saying Dems Don't Want to...
'I'm Not Kidding': Retired Professor Says He Ordered a 'Gun' to Hopefully Shoot...
NBC News: Members of Team USA Expressing Regret for Laughing at Trump’s Joke
Misery Loves Company: Rapinoe Dumps on Olympic Glory to Remind Everyone She's Still...
Toronto Star Writer Still Butthurt About Team USA Hockey Captain Meeting Trump
Marco Cubio Leads the Pack: Twitter Conquers Cuba with the Funniest New Territory...
Rep. Seth Moulton Brought an Illegal Alien Teen to the State of the...
Judge to Hear Arguments About Whether Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s Human Trafficking Case Is...
NYT, WSJ Confirm NPR Report About Missing Epstein Files Tying Trump to Sexually...
Miracle on Missouri Highway: Wrong-Way Somali Trucker Who Can't Read English Barely Avoids...
ABC News: Man Arrested for ‘Assault’ for ‘Attacking’ Police Officer During Snowball Fight
Feminist Karens Furious That a Women's League Literally Nobody Watches Refuses to Hand...

WOKEPEDIA: Here's Where Donations for Wikipedia REALLY Go and WOW, No Wonder They're a Woke Hot MESS

Twitchy

If you've ever been debating (arguing) with some crazed Leftist on X, often times he/she/it will used Wikipedia for a source thinking they've REALLY owned you this time when in fact, they have not. Many people on the Right have known for a long, long time that Wikipedia is not a valid source but seeing how they spend their donations makes it even worse.

Advertisement

There's a reason some people call the site, WOKEPEDIA.

Yeah, we like that too.

Take a look:

His post continues:

Critics are calling it “Wokepedia,” accusing the platform of prioritizing ideology over function. Meanwhile, the internet’s collective eye-roll is almost audible.

Sure, inclusion is nice, but maybe they could use some of that money to ensure they're a reliable source of information first? 

Just a thought.

Diversity for diversity's sake is never a good thing because ultimately it's all based on discriminating against one group or another.

DEI.

Alrighty then.

Only just slightly.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Advertisement

Probably the same people who donated to Kamala Harris's campaign ... ahem.

Hey man, it's not cheap keeping up with DEI ... wokeness is expensive. Oh, and yes, it turns everything into s**t as a very wise former and president-elect Trump once said.

Sort of reminds us of the definition for racist: anyone who disagrees with a Leftist and beats them in an argument.

Ya' think, bro?

Huh ... interesting.

Advertisement

Pretty sure Wokepedia ... sorry ... Wikipedia won't be putting the facts and truth over diversity and inclusion any time soon.

===========================================================================

Related:

Sounds PRETTY Insurrection-y: The Hill Tries Making Case to STOP TRUMP from Taking Office and OH HELL NO

HO HO OH LOL-NO! Leftist Mocked for Whining About the Midwest DAD We Could Have Had With a VP Tim Walz

X BRUTALLY Reminds Rachel Maddow About Biden's JOKE Admin After She Mocks Trump's Hostage Envoy Picks

SUCH a Tool: Anthony Scaramucci Threatens Elon Musk to Stay Out of Politics and HOOBOY Was THAT Ever Dumb

Her Own Personal KRYPTONITE! Top Trump Campaign Pollster Shares Which of Their Ads NUKED Kamala the Most

===========================================================================

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement