The only thing that's almost as much fun as watching Democrats and the Left meltdown in REAL-TIME after SCOTUS ruled that states cannot remove Trump from the ballot is looking through Drew Holden's thread mocking and dragging all of the media types and Lefty 'experts' who said it was totally legit for them to kick him off.
THIS is entertainment:
🧵Thread🧵
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
What happened to the media’s legal “experts” who said Colorado was right to kick Trump off the ballot? Remember them? I do. @FreeBeacon.
Quick trip down memory lane after even the liberal SCOTUS justices rejected Colorado’s claims. ⤵️https://t.co/FW0NGjcVdA
And here we go:
Here’s a link to the video which is incredible. Lot of media hosts and talking heads were convinced Trump was toast. (H/t @thaleigha_ for making this gem).
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
The “experts” said so!
https://t.co/oClrNqS1mL
Gotta love those experts.
Print reporting read the same way. @nytimes cited an “expert” who said Colorado’s case was “legally sound” and that the only thing that could stop it was politics.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
Why, then, did the 3 liberal justices also side against Colorado? pic.twitter.com/1etzmXrO0t
Legally sound. HA HA HA HA HA HA
Oopsie.
@washingtonpost repeated that “legally sound” narrative in a headline. Their “experts” also said “there’s a strong legal case” supporting Colorado.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
If it’s so strong, why did a liberal Biden appointee reject it, exactly? pic.twitter.com/8mG3UGd8DQ
Once they get their talking points they stick to them.
Impressive in a not-so-great way.
My favorite might be @ABC, who cited “experts” to claim both that Colorado was right to kick Trump off, and that Trump and co were wrong to object to it.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
Interesting how these “experts” can reliably voice a uniform perspective when it suits a media narrative. pic.twitter.com/Wu5WDCOU73
Interesting is an interesting word for it. Heh.
@CNN’s headline captures the liberal wishcasting perfectly. They swapped “scholars” in for experts. pic.twitter.com/jGhIJ7h4c8
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
OOOOH SCHOLARS.
Take that, experts!
There were some wild headlines on this one. @politico quoted an “expert” to say the case wasn’t just strong, but “unassailable”(!)
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
What happened to that? pic.twitter.com/BYHQ1HFIou
Unassailable.
You have to wonder if they ever get tired of being so wrong all of the time.
It’s clear, the “experts” that @Salon rounded up said. Trump was already disqualified. pic.twitter.com/NZNBHQ1TKN
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
Salon.
Experts.
Now, that is funny.
This one from @voxdotcom and @imillhiser just cracks me up.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
Just brutal side by side. Was it a “fraught debate”? Or was it a foregone conclusion? Seems it can’t be both. pic.twitter.com/qUt9OEGgSM
It's always the same people.
It’s in the video but this @MSNBC round table featuring @ElieNYC sounds even more deranged in the hindsight of the ruling.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
The case was a “slam dunk” according to MSNBC and their resident “experts” pic.twitter.com/WCyse6203h
Awww, poor Elie.
Hey, he's good television.
And of course, Twitter’s resident legal-expert-if-the-partisan-narrative-fits @tribelaw tweeted about it too. pic.twitter.com/OWBI4eQK7w
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
*snort*
But fear not, liberal media believers. As @AP assured readers, Trump’s problems are only just beginning.
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) March 5, 2024
I’m sure the legal “experts” think so. pic.twitter.com/si2KeN2PKQ
See?! Trump's win is ACTUALLY a loss ... or something.
Never change, media, experts, and scholars.
======================================================================
Related:
MOOORE Bad News for Lefties! BREAKING News Out of Texas Hands Biden Administration ANOTHER Huge Loss
======================================================================
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Also, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member