You know how we know the Left is freaking out about the SCOTUS unanimously ruling in Trump's favor this morning? It's not their meltdowns on social media (although that has absolutely been hilarious), no no, it's the people trying to persuade everyone that this ruling was actually BAD for Trump.
Desperate mouth-breathers are unable to accept the loss, like Ian Bassin who previously served as Associate White House Counsel under President Obama.
That makes him Obama's attorney.
Heh.
The loudest sentence in today’s opinion is the one that’s not there. The Court had a chance to absolve Trump of having engaged in insurrection against the United States and declined to do that, which is a stunning statement by our nation’s highest court. /1
— Ian Bassin 🇺🇦 (@ianbassin) March 4, 2024
But wait, there's more.
While Trump may have won a battle over legal technicalities to restore himself to the ballot, he lost on the bigger question of whether he’d be absolved of being an insurrectionist. On that question the Court has now passed the ball to all Americans to ultimately decide.. /2
— Ian Bassin 🇺🇦 (@ianbassin) March 4, 2024
..on the fitness for office of someone who refused to accept the will of the voters and launched a violent insurrection against our government to block the transfer of power. /end
— Ian Bassin 🇺🇦 (@ianbassin) March 4, 2024
Except that wasn't the question today, Ian. It was whether or not states could remove him from the ballot.
And the answer was NO.
Recommended
A resounding, unanimous NO.
Lol that really wasn’t the controversy at hand for them to decide. They don’t just arbitrarily decide things not relevant to the controversy.
— J (@j913tn) March 4, 2024
How are you a lawyer?
Good question.
— RGallegos (@gallegosr) March 4, 2024
No really, it was a bad thing! REEEEEE.
We should include this guy on our 'meltdown' piece.
Yes, SCOTUs should have ruled on a matter that was not an issue in the case, for which not arguments were made, and for which they did not see a shred of evidence.
— Dan Krishock (@dkrishock) March 4, 2024
And you were counsel for Obama?
Counsel for Obama.
It reads, right?
1. If it wasn't said, you made it up. That is called a strawman.
— Jswarens (@jeff_swarens) March 4, 2024
2. There is no reason to absolve anyone from a crime they have never been charged with.
You boys don't get a new way to cheat.
Desperate times call for desperate measures ...
And Democrats are desperate.
======================================================================
Related:
MOOORE Bad News for Lefties! BREAKING News Out of Texas Hands Biden Administration ANOTHER Huge Loss
======================================================================
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Also, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member