Maybe it's just us but gosh golly gee, it is starting to sound like there are MAJOR problems with plagiarism at Harvard.
And not with the students.
As you all know, former Harvard president, Claudine Gay, resigned after Christopher Rufo exposed her for plagiarizing (not to mention she was a serious antisemite), and it looks like Rufo found another administrator who can't seem to come up with her own content either.
DEI Administrator Shirley Greene.
Take a look:
I've obtained documents alleging that Harvard DEI administrator Shirley Greene plagiarized more than 40 passages in her PhD thesis, making her the third black woman at Harvard to be accused of academic fraud.
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
Harvard's plagiarism crisis is spinning out of control. 🧵
sdlakfjsalf
Greene is a Title IX coordinator affiliated with the Office for Gender Equity. She has worked to advance "Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging," and hosted a panel on "The Past, Present, and Future of Juneteenth" with the DEI department.
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
The Harvard Crimson previously downplayed… pic.twitter.com/eaN7sqcux4
From the rest of his post:
The Harvard Crimson previously downplayed the allegations against Greene, but I have obtained the full plagiarism complaint that paints a much more damning indictment of Greene’s scholarship than the student newspaper had let on.
He continued:
In the dissertation, Greene lifts multiple passages directly from Janelle Lee Woo’s 2004 dissertation, "Chinese American Female Identity." In one section, Greene copied words, phrases, and nearly entire paragraphs verbatim, without proper attribution or quotation. pic.twitter.com/VlD5nNbYCR
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
Verbatim, without proper attribution or quotation.
We're SHOCKED!
Oh, wait, this is Harvard we're talking about. Not shocked.
In addition, Greene lifted an entire table on "Racial/Ethnic Identity Development Models," a foundational concept in the paper, without proper attribution to Woo. This appears to be a flagrant violation of Harvard's plagiarism policy. pic.twitter.com/NqLuKg9Ax2
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
Blatant.
In total, the complaint identifies dozens of such passages in Greene's dissertation, ranging from minor infringements to what appears to be outright theft of concepts and language. pic.twitter.com/8ua6auq2fZ
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
In other words, plagiarism.
Bigly.
Harvard's policy is quite clear: "If you copy language word for word from another source and use that language in your paper, you are plagiarizing verbatim." pic.twitter.com/wkTRbmDRts
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
This. ^
Interestingly, Harvard's Chief Diversity Officer, Sherri Ann Charleston, was accused of the exact same number (40) of instances of plagiarism last month. pic.twitter.com/r4u5tA3sBI
— Don Wolt (@tlowdon) February 22, 2024
Oh FFS.
Yes, it seems that plagiarists do not plagiarize lightly.
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) February 22, 2024
When Harvard admins plagiarize they PLAGIARIZE.
Wow.
======================================================================
Related:
Bro, You're Drunk. Go Home: David Hogg Tries Dunking on Clarence Thomas Over Ethics and LOL-HOOBOY
======================================================================
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Also, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member