AYFKM?! What Sussmann juror said to 'some media' after verdict tells us this was kinda sorta totally NOT an unbiased jury

We all knew the Sussmann jury was pretty tarnished but holy crap. There were rumblings about various members of this jury who had blatant and obvious conflicts of interest but you’d think these jurors would at least want to try and give the impression they weren’t biased, right? Pretend a LITTLE?

Or maybe they just don’t care because they know they’re safe in the swamp.

Look at this:

Juror speaks to some media after Sussmann verdict
“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she said of the case. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

— Jeff Mordock (@JeffMordock) May 31, 2022

It’s ok for Democrats to lie to the FBI apparently since there are more important things in the nation to worry about.

!!!

That.

Is.

Insane.

“It was the government’s job to prove it and they succeeded in some ways and not in others,” she continued. “We broke it down and it did not pan out in the government’s favor.”

The woman, who did not give her name, declined to say how she thought the government succeeded.

— Jeff Mordock (@JeffMordock) May 31, 2022

‘We broke it down and decided to let our biases bias us.’

Fixed it for her.

Notice she didn’t want to give her name or explain exactly how she thought the government had succeeded.

Unreal.

No, you know what? It’s all too real.

Lying to the FBI is okay if you’re a Democrat operative. https://t.co/rkFZcHrFRy

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) May 31, 2022

Who knew?

Jury pool: pic.twitter.com/K7T3AJiYAV

— NellieC0hrnp0p ☭ (@nelliec0rnp0p) May 31, 2022

Recommended

Hillary Clinton Better BUCKLE UP Because Buzz Patterson (and Monica Lewinsky!) Are Spillin' the Bubba Tea

Sam J.

Advertisement

Wow that's egregious

— Patricia Collins 🇺🇲 (@cpat3188) May 31, 2022

Word.

Spoken like someone who should never have been on a jury.

— Squatching Duck (@sttngduck) May 31, 2022

Yuuuuup.

Pure and simple jury nullification. Judge should have thrown the verdict out

— BigPapiWinston (@papi_winston) May 31, 2022

So now the jurors get to decide whether or not the crime is a crime worth prosecuting. Used to be they just got to decide on the facts of the case, not whether or not they liked the law.

— John Ackermann (@Jojoacke) May 31, 2022

Teflon Hillary strikes again.

***

Related:

WH staff’s DESPERATE attempt at correcting NBC’s article claiming Biden hates it when WH staff correct him is *CHEF’S KISS*

‘They say it’s innocent. They LIE’: Libs of TikTok shares ‘MEGA DRAG THREAD’ dropping each and EVERY ‘groomer apologist’

Let the REEE’ing BEGIN! Elon Musk MOCKS corporations’ fake virtue-signaling with rainbow logos we’ll see in June and Lefties LOSE IT