Trope Trounced: Van Jones Foolishly Plays the ‘Unelected Billionaire’ Card on Scott Jennin...
Life in Prison? Biden Reportedly Mulling Erasing Death Sentences for Several Inmates
Depressed Mode: Fashion-Forward or Step Backward? Reactions to Ella Emhoff’s Prada Pics
Mike Johnson Criticized As The CR Heads to The Senate: Brit Hume Asks,...
White House Cover-Up: Scott Jennings Asks Will Dems Who Lied for Biden Be...
The Third Spending Bill Passed the House Avoiding a Government Shutdown
Jacqui Heinrich Explains Why KJP Did Not Get 1 Q About WSJ's Report...
The Official 'Democrats' Account Tried to Own Trump, but Twitter Absolutely Dragged Them
Music Industry Tools, Rage Against The Machine Discovers The Joy of Selling Out...
Democrat Caught Lying about Residency Flips Minnesota House Back to GOP
'The Vehicles Are at It Again!' Driver Plowed Through a Christmas Market and...
Shocker: The 'Impossible' Thing Dems Said Would Never Happen, Totally Happened Again
Here's a Flashback to Just 1 Reason Nicolle Wallace Is a 'Media Propagandist...
Joe Biden’s Potential Incompetence Threatens Chaos in Our System (And We Should Embrace...
VIP Membership Christmas SALE: 60% Off!

Jonathan Chait Says the Media's Double Standard Favors Trump, not Harris

Twitchy

Considering New York magazine's Jonathan Chait has pegged Twitchy as a "conservative rage curator," we'll do our best to keep our rage in check. The last we checked in with Chait, he was stubbornly arguing that Donald Trump had pulled out of a debate he'd scheduled with President Joe Biden after Biden pulled out of the race completely.

Advertisement

As we reported earlier, Autism Capital compiled all of the negative headlines following Trump's conversation with Elon Musk on Monday night.

The conversation took place after a Washington Post correspondent had asked press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre if there wasn't some way the White House could "intervene" to prevent dangerous political misinformation from being spread.

We also showed you the subtle difference between TIME Magazine's covers of Trump and of Kamala Harris, who declined to be interviewed for her own puff piece:

Forget all of that, because Chait has informed us that the media indeed follows a double standard, and it favors Trump, not Harris.

Please, enlighten us:

The most important way Trump benefits from a double standard is simply that his violations of democratic and civic norms are so widespread that the media have given up on holding him to anything resembling a customary standard of behavior for a presidential candidate.

A recent example will suffice: Imagine if Harris published a statement alleging that a recent Trump rally attended by thousands of people was actually empty, that the crowd at the rally was faked through artificial intelligence, and that the news media helped perpetuate this gigantic fraud. Suppose she proceeded to argue that this alleged fakery was a form of “election interference” that disqualified Trump from the ballot.

This would be an existential crisis for Harris. Cable news would break into its programming to cover this and wouldn’t stop until she was driven from the race. Newspapers would print multiple Watergate-level front-page stories about Harris going stark raving mad and threatening democracy.

Advertisement

Notice how Chait has to resort to a hypothetical. He does so, of course, knowing that the Trump campaign has actually done this, although we're not sure which AI-enhanced photo we're talking about. Sure Harris' teeming crowds have six fingers and don't cast reflections, but that doesn't mean they're faked.

OK, look. Here's another example. Compare CBS News' coverage of Trump's "no tax on tips" policy with Harris' curiously identical policy announcement:

The double standard is obvious.

We think it's actually 96 percent.

How about when Trump was shot, and CNN's headline reported that he "fell down."

Advertisement

Oh yes, the morning after the Harris campaign sent out the memo to use the word "joy" to describe her campaign against Trump's message of doom and gloom.

If they have, we haven't seen it. Media coverage of Harris consists of going back and "correcting" three-year-old stories where she was mistakenly referred to as the "border czar."

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement