Let’s jump right into the clips. First up, we have MSNBC:
JUST IN: Former FBI Director James Comey is expected to be indicted in the coming days.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 24, 2025
“Three sources familiar tell MSNBC former FBI Director James Comey is expected to be indicted in the coming days.”
About time. pic.twitter.com/VuSPUjUl7G
Just to focus on that clip for a moment, the charge would be lying to congress and/or perjury. (The difference is whether or not Comey was sworn in before he spoke.) According to them it stems from testimony before Congress in September of 2020. The statute of limitations is for five years and it is about to expire. A little Googling tells us that he testified on September 30, 2020 about the Trump-Russia investigation, so that seems to set the deadline. Annoyingly, they cut off before they discuss what specific lies he might have allegedly told.
After that, we have this clip from CNN:
And CNN confirms MSNBC's reporting that James Comey expects an indictment from the Department of Justice to come soon pic.twitter.com/rT5W1d4F6P
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 24, 2025
Of course, some of their analysis is fair, noting that an indictment is far, far from proof of guilt, or talking about the danger of lawfare. But it’s funny, we don’t recall CNN making these points when Trump was indicted four times right in time for maximum interference with the election cycle. Somehow all that caution they are sounding right now was thrown to the wind when Trump was indicted.
Ultimately, if the indictment happens and it is as described, they will have to prove that Comey made a false statement of material fact that he knew to be false at the time he made it. So, for instance, it is a complete defense to say someone lied to him, and he was duped—because it is not lying or perjury unless you knew it was false. And yes, that is true even if the person was stupid to have been duped.
Recommended
Some reactions:
You just hate to see it. 😭 pic.twitter.com/hlW7pYnVDM
— Gain of Fauci (@DschlopesIsBack) September 24, 2025
There are a lot more people that need to be as well. Bill, Hillary, Barry, Adam, Fauci, etc.
— TheRightGuy (@TheRightGuy101) September 24, 2025
Indicted for aggravated sea shell arrangement 😂 home of the brave they say 😂
— Xmus Waxon Flaxon Jaxon 🇬🇧 🇳🇬 (@chairmanMAO_92) September 24, 2025
That would be a reference to Comey’s seashell adventure, where he claimed to magically find a group of seashells arranged to say ‘86 47’ which many interpreted as a code for murdering (86’ing) Donald Trump (called commonly the 45th and 47th president). We think it would be hard to justify indicting Comey on that because while many suspect that Comey arranged the seashells himself, we are unlikely to be able to prove that. And if we can’t prove he arranged the seashells himself, it would be hard to argue that there is a proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he was doing more than showing people something he saw.
On the other hand, Comey might have ironically made it easier to prosecute someone who uses the phrase after the controversy. The Supreme Court said if a person intentionally makes a threat or unintentionally and recklessly uses threatening language, that can be a crime under the first amendment. (Counterman v. Colorado, 143 S. Ct. 2106 (2023).) So while Comey might plead ignorance that his statement can be taken as a threat, anyone who uses that language after that controversy can be prosecuted because they know it can be interpreted as a threat.
James Comey.
— Dr. Lucien Wolfe 🇺🇸 (@LucienWolfe111) September 24, 2025
The guy who weaponized the FBI against Trump.
The guy who leaked, lied, and covered for Hillary.
Now he’s finally about to face an indictment.
Took long enough. ⚡️
About time, Collin.
— Desiree (@DesireeAmerica4) September 24, 2025
But let’s be real! Pam Bondi better be moving methodically, because we are beyond tired of the waiting game. No more delays, no more “sources familiar.”
We want indictments, perp walks, and justice with teeth.
Let’s go.🔥
Certainly, with Comey, it is time to get off their behinds and get going, if they are going to to anything at all.
Never understood why leak this? Shouldn’t indictments be secret till it happens? I mean anyone could just escape if tipped off.
— TW_Simpson (@sissipher) September 24, 2025
Indeed, why are they leaking to MSNBC and CNN? The U.S. Attorney’s office needs to plug its leaks. Or at least start leaking to outlets that are friendly. Like seriously, this author. Please?????!!!
The only bad part is that these leaks to MSNBC have to be coming from either DOJ or inside the EDVA office, which means deep state snakes and saboteurs still have access to what’s going on and may be working to undermine it.
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) September 24, 2025
Yeah, that, too.
https://t.co/Ik9EnKwzvV pic.twitter.com/rTPl67a36r
— Patrick Powers (@ppowers61955) September 24, 2025
We’ve seen many people saying that, too. That seems to be the majority response and … well … we are not sure we disagree with them.
Maybe Justice will be served . . 🤔 https://t.co/SJ0r5a8SjU
— Lawyerforlaws (@lawyer4laws) September 24, 2025
— Verum Omnino Costs (@CostsVerum23011) September 24, 2025
— Real Florida Reb (@florida_reb) September 24, 2025
Bondi couldn’t even indict the Subway Sandwich guy….ill believe it when I see it pic.twitter.com/7oJt5dEUjQ
— WestCoast_Life (@westcoast_lyfe) September 24, 2025
In that case it was probably jury nullification, in the unusually hostile environment of Washington, D.C. The Eastern District of Virginia is less hostile.
— StockChartArt (@CasualtyWar) September 24, 2025
Finally:
— SonofLiberty357 (@SonofLiberty357) September 24, 2025
Heh. Conan was much better before he got into late night comedy.
RELATED: WATCH: London Cop Threatens to Arrest a Man for Being ‘Openly Jewish’
WATCH: Trump’s Second Would-Be Assassin Allegedly Responds Violently to the Guilty Verdict
Kamala Harris Discovers What a Woman Is
BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard Blows Open Russiagate With Document Dump
BREAKING: An NYT Interview With Biden Just Undermined Thousands of His Late Pardons (A Deep Dive)
‘First Do No Harm:’ Fisking John Oliver on the Transgender/Sports Issue
Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at Twitchy, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.
Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join Twitchy VIP today and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member