Here's the Entertainment You Get for Your $1,000 Floor Ticket to Bruce Springsteen
Hot Take: Fortunately for Missing Airman, Iran Is Not as Barbaric as Trump...
Kamala Harris: We Cannot Allow Trump to Hand Pick Another Supreme Court Justice
Rep. Shri Thanedar Announces Impeachment Effort Against Pam Bondi in Unfortunate Video
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Has Found Another 'Asylum Seeker' Sob Story to Share
Fox Business Anchor Looks at Questionable Charges to Eric Swalwell’s Campaign
Qasem Soleimani‘s Niece, Who Was Granted Asylum, Arrested by ICE; Legal Status Terminated
EVERYONE IS HITLER! AP Government Textbook Shows Everything Wrong With Education in a...
Brit Hume Busts Gavin Newsom Telling ANOTHER Whopper (This Time About Fox News...
Protesters March on Good Friday to Site of ‘Crucifixions’ of George Floyd, Renee...
SAVE Act Opponent Barack Obama Has an IRONIC Requirement in Order to Win...
NY Times Spotted Serving Up Another Embarrassing Take (It's 123 Years Old and...
Here's Why the NY Times' Cringey NATO Headline Likely Made It Past 'Layers...
Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Would Appreciate Help With Legal Expenses to Fight Charges...
Calif. Investigation Confirms What We Already Knew: Gavin Newsom's Gas Price Blame Game...

'BUSTED': These journos may have just TORPEDOED media/Dem narrative about FBI texts

As Twitchy told you, the Mueller probe suffered yet another potentially fatal blow when damning anti-Trump text messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were revealed. Business Insider’s Natasha Bertrand, for one, seemed taken aback by the idea that the DOJ would share internal documents with reporters during an investigation:

Advertisement

More from Business Insider:

It is “highly unusual” for the DOJ to release correspondences that are the subject of an ongoing investigation to Congress, let alone to the press, a source on one of the congressional committees investigating Russia’s election interference told Business Insider on Wednesday.

The source emphasized that none of the leaks came from Capitol Hill, which obtained the texts from the DOJ separately on Tuesday.

“It’s appalling behavior by the department,” said Matthew Miller, a former DOJ spokesman. “This is an ongoing investigation in which these employees have due-process rights, and the political leadership at DOJ has thrown them to the wolves so Rosenstein can get credit from House Republicans at his hearing today.”

One source close to the process who requested anonymity to discuss internal DOJ deliberations said the texts were given to reporters in case they did not leak in time for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s public hearing on Wednesday morning.

“It is at least debatable whether it was appropriate to turn them over to the Hill in the middle of an ongoing investigation,” Miller said. “Under no circumstances was it appropriate to leak them to the press.”

Advertisement

Just how “appalling” is it, though? Because according to ABC News reporter Mike Levine, this sort of thing isn’t unprecedented:

Other reporters are backing up Levine’s on this:

Huh.

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941030499493011457

https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/941030799683538945

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941031254987767809

Advertisement

Good question. It’s almost as if media are OK with leaks when Democrats benefit. But that couldn’t be right, could it?

***

Related:

‘Clown show’! NYT spin on hearing about FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts looks familiar

WATCH: Trey Gowdy goes OFF during hearing on FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement