Gay Couple Sues Surrogate for Not Aborting Baby With Cleft Lip
Study: Apple and Google News Suppressed Negative Stories About Graham Platner for Months
Independent Journalist Jim Acosta Is Back at the Reflecting Pool, Reporting No Signs...
Flake E. Jean Carroll Receives $5.62 Million Payment From President Trump
All Hell Breaks Loose After ICE Shooting As Democrats Caught Lying Again
So, Yeah ... THIS Is Gonna Suck: Little House on the Prairie Remake...
Seven Years of Lies and B.S.: Gov. Whitmer's Social Media Guru Gets MOCKED...
Mentally Ill Guy Who Thinks He's a Woman Applied for Asylum in the...
ICE Instructed to Cease Most Traffic Stops
Jessica Tarlov Clearly TOO STUPID to See Irony of Her Post Accusing Trump...
It Was THRUST UPON HIM, or Something: James Franco Thinks He Has Footage...
What Elissa Slotkin Just Said About Democratic Women Makes Them All Look Really...
Trump STUNS Doomer Experts ... Again: Inflation PLUMMETS the Largest Amount in...
'I WAS Ready to Believe You': Podcaster INFURIATES Ro Khanna by Factually DISMANTLING...
Scott Jennings Turns CNN Panel Into Babbling, Ranty Mess (ESPECIALLY Touré) in Trump...

'BUSTED': These journos may have just TORPEDOED media/Dem narrative about FBI texts

As Twitchy told you, the Mueller probe suffered yet another potentially fatal blow when damning anti-Trump text messages between FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were revealed. Business Insider’s Natasha Bertrand, for one, seemed taken aback by the idea that the DOJ would share internal documents with reporters during an investigation:

Advertisement

More from Business Insider:

It is “highly unusual” for the DOJ to release correspondences that are the subject of an ongoing investigation to Congress, let alone to the press, a source on one of the congressional committees investigating Russia’s election interference told Business Insider on Wednesday.

The source emphasized that none of the leaks came from Capitol Hill, which obtained the texts from the DOJ separately on Tuesday.

“It’s appalling behavior by the department,” said Matthew Miller, a former DOJ spokesman. “This is an ongoing investigation in which these employees have due-process rights, and the political leadership at DOJ has thrown them to the wolves so Rosenstein can get credit from House Republicans at his hearing today.”

One source close to the process who requested anonymity to discuss internal DOJ deliberations said the texts were given to reporters in case they did not leak in time for Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s public hearing on Wednesday morning.

“It is at least debatable whether it was appropriate to turn them over to the Hill in the middle of an ongoing investigation,” Miller said. “Under no circumstances was it appropriate to leak them to the press.”

Advertisement

Just how “appalling” is it, though? Because according to ABC News reporter Mike Levine, this sort of thing isn’t unprecedented:

Other reporters are backing up Levine’s on this:

Huh.

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941030499493011457

https://twitter.com/davidharsanyi/status/941030799683538945

https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/941031254987767809

Advertisement

Good question. It’s almost as if media are OK with leaks when Democrats benefit. But that couldn’t be right, could it?

***

Related:

‘Clown show’! NYT spin on hearing about FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts looks familiar

WATCH: Trey Gowdy goes OFF during hearing on FBI agents’ anti-Trump texts

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement