Andy Beshear: His Faith Led Him to Veto ‘The Nastiest Piece of Anti-LGBTQ...
Bill Melugin FINISHES the Dem/Media's Desperate and Dishonest 'Non-Violent Illegal' Spin
Politico: Dems Now Fear Body Cameras Could Be Mass Surveillance Tool for ICE
Jasmine Crockett Says They’re Playing Games to Distract From Trump’s Mentions in the...
Olympic Skier Says He’s Proud to Use His ‘Platform’ to Send ICE a...
Houston Chronicle Rushes in to Defend Old Clip of Gene Wu Talking About...
DHS Obliterates the Latest Propaganda Effort About 'Non-Violent' Illegals ICE Has Arrested
Democrat PAC Puts Out Anti-ICE Ad Featuring EVIL Generic Republican Congressman
Abigail Spanberger's Disrespect for Virginia Knows NO Limits
MORE Firings, Bezos: WaPo Applauds Bad Bunny's Halftime Show as 'Wholesome' and 'Family-Fr...
So Much WOOF: Wes Moore TORCHED for Playing the Race Card While LYING...
Jessica Tarlov Helps Prove CBS News' ICE Arrests Spin Provided the Desired Narrative...
Jon Levine Exposes Yet ANOTHER Racist, Antisemitic Member of Zohran Mamdani's Circle in...
Spot the Difference: Megyn Kelly Highlights the Opposing Worldviews of JD Vance and...
BRO ... Get a Room! John Brennan's Trump/Obama Meme Meltdown Turns Into Hilarious...

WOW: Brit Hume shares piece on the 'shaky basis for impeaching Trump' from a law professor ... who's also a Democrat

Nancy.

Sweetie.

Adam.

Jacka**.

When a law professor who happens to be a Democrat is even calling your basis for impeaching Trump ‘shaky’ you know it’s not a good thing.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

Most importantly, Trump has gone to court to seek judicial review of these conflicts between the legislative and executive branches. He is entitled to do so, just as President Nixon and President Clinton did. Obama also sought such judicial review. What Trump cannot do is disobey a final judicial order. To impeach a president for seeking judicial review would itself be an abuse of our constitutional system.

Crimes may be revealed in upcoming testimony, but they need to be grounded in the criminal code rather than in the imagination of members of Congress. I have long criticized the poorly considered statement by President Ford that “an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be.” That often cited quote wrongly suggests impeachment is based on a purely political, not a legal, standard. Even if the House has broad license in impeachment, it does not have license to redefine crimes to fit impeachments.

Advertisement

Keep in mind, this article was not on Fox News, it was not written by a Republican or even a Libertarian. And the guy is a law professor … maybe Nancy and Schiff should just cut their losses and bail at this point because it doesn’t look good for them.

Like, at all.

Right? They have set a terrible precedent; we’re guessing if another Democrat ever ends up in the White House again he or she will face all sorts of Hell from the Republicans. #BuckleUp

And they’ll have Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi to thank for all of it.

Advertisement

The whole thing has shed a troubling light on these diplomats and will likely backfire on Democrats during an all-important election year.

Way to go, Nan and Schiff-Head. Trump says thanks.

 


Related:

‘Disturbing’: Sharyl Attkisson notices 1 VERY TELLING thing all diplomatic witnesses have in common and it ain’t good for Schiff

Do you HEAR yourself?! Byron York calls out an extremely hypocritical Nancy Pelosi for claiming impeachment is not partisan

‘Talk about DESPERATE’: Jim Jordan uses David Holmes’ opening statement to BLAST Democrats and it’s brutally perfect

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement