CNN Doesn't Even Crack the Top 35 (Heck, Reruns on Other CHANNELS Are...
Jack Smith Under Fire As Bombshell New Trump Probe Records Surface
Had Him DEAD to Rights: John Kennedy SO Owned Jack Smith That Dick...
Obama Face-Plants SPECTACULARLY Asking How Americans Got So 'Toxic and Divided'. No, Reall...
MEE-OW: Hasan Piker’s Maid Clip Is Making the Rounds and HOOBOY, He CAN'T...
STUNNED: Jack Smith Has True Deer in Headlights Moment As Eric Schmitt Breaks...
Heap Big OUCH! Elizabeth Warren's Self-Righteous List of 'Hills She'll Die On' SKEWERED...
Byron York Fact-NUKES Team Talarico's Lie About Ken Paxton's Uvalde God Comments in...
Every Time Ro Khanna Pushes Eat the Rich Rhetoric, X Posts Pics of...
We Could Watch Jake Tapper BEG Mike Walz to Ask Trump to 'Let...
Justine Bateman Has the PERFECT Response to BBC Accusing Women With Bare Nails...
‘Male’ Shoot: New York Magazine Men’s Style Issue Features Farcical and Freakish Front...
Clueless Christiane: CNN’s Amanpour Blames ‘Series of Events’ for Public’s Distrust of Leg...
Ms. Rachel Proclaims That Black Teen Nolan Wells Didn’t Drown
CBC News 'Is Well on Its Way to Becoming a Judenfrei (Jew-Free) Broadcaster'

WOW: Brit Hume shares piece on the 'shaky basis for impeaching Trump' from a law professor ... who's also a Democrat

Nancy.

Sweetie.

Adam.

Jacka**.

When a law professor who happens to be a Democrat is even calling your basis for impeaching Trump ‘shaky’ you know it’s not a good thing.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

Most importantly, Trump has gone to court to seek judicial review of these conflicts between the legislative and executive branches. He is entitled to do so, just as President Nixon and President Clinton did. Obama also sought such judicial review. What Trump cannot do is disobey a final judicial order. To impeach a president for seeking judicial review would itself be an abuse of our constitutional system.

Crimes may be revealed in upcoming testimony, but they need to be grounded in the criminal code rather than in the imagination of members of Congress. I have long criticized the poorly considered statement by President Ford that “an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be.” That often cited quote wrongly suggests impeachment is based on a purely political, not a legal, standard. Even if the House has broad license in impeachment, it does not have license to redefine crimes to fit impeachments.

Advertisement

Keep in mind, this article was not on Fox News, it was not written by a Republican or even a Libertarian. And the guy is a law professor … maybe Nancy and Schiff should just cut their losses and bail at this point because it doesn’t look good for them.

Like, at all.

Right? They have set a terrible precedent; we’re guessing if another Democrat ever ends up in the White House again he or she will face all sorts of Hell from the Republicans. #BuckleUp

And they’ll have Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi to thank for all of it.

Advertisement

The whole thing has shed a troubling light on these diplomats and will likely backfire on Democrats during an all-important election year.

Way to go, Nan and Schiff-Head. Trump says thanks.

 


Related:

‘Disturbing’: Sharyl Attkisson notices 1 VERY TELLING thing all diplomatic witnesses have in common and it ain’t good for Schiff

Do you HEAR yourself?! Byron York calls out an extremely hypocritical Nancy Pelosi for claiming impeachment is not partisan

‘Talk about DESPERATE’: Jim Jordan uses David Holmes’ opening statement to BLAST Democrats and it’s brutally perfect

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement