Buyer Beware: Divided Ohio Supreme Court Says Boneless Wings Can, In Fact, Contain...
FIGHT! Trump Announces Plans to Hold Another Rally in Butler, PA
WATCH: Kamala Is All in on Defunding the Police, 'Upending the System' and...
BANANA REPUBLIC: 40 Former DOJ Officials Endorse Kamala Harris for President
In a Terrible Blow to 'Ear Truthers' the FBI CONFIRMS President Trump Was...
Days After Trump Was Shot, Former Secret Service Agent Says Harris Faces Greater...
Flat 'Ear-th' Truther Wajahat Ali Demands Trump's Medical Records
VERIFIABLY FALSE: Judge in Defamation Case Rules Rachel Maddow, MSNBC Straight Up Lied...
No One Is Above the Law (Except Democrats): Charges DROPPED Against DC Protesters...
New Green Grift? Kamala Clearly Has No 'Fracking' Idea What She's Talking About
THIS Is Biden's Actual Legacy: Never Forget He Tried to Mandate Vaccines for...
History Rewrite Continues: CBS Says Trump 'Falsely' Accused Harris of Donating to MN...
Wait? She's RIGHT! Democrats Should DEFINITELY Do What Kamala Harris Wants When It...
President Trump Welcomes Bibi Netanyahu with a Hearty Greeting at His Personal Home...
Scientific American Shifts Into Propaganda Overdrive Explaining Expertise Kamala Harris Wo...

Helloooo NARRATIVE: Brit Hume notices something all too telling in how media covers 'claims' against Trump versus Biden

Brit Hume is definitely onto something here.

Well, Real Clear Investigations is responsible FOR the piece but anytime Brit shares an article you know it is something worth reading.

Advertisement

And he was right about this one, as usual.

From Real Clear Investigations:

For three years many of journalism’s most prestigious news outlets won acclaim for making and repeating claims President Trump and his team had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. No accusation, from secret meetings in Prague to tales of prostitutes peeing on beds, was deemed unfit to print. When they wanted to signal to readers that they were conveying claims instead of facts, their hedge words of choice – “unverified” or “not yet proved” were favorites – strongly suggested that confirmation was on the way.

Call it the Trump Standard.

Now those same news outfits are observing a new standard of proof, at least when it involves former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who enjoyed a lucrative relationship with a Ukrainian gas company. This new norm demands that, absent definitive proof, assertions must be labeled as “without evidence” or said to be supported by “no evidence.”

Call it the Biden Standard.

So we have a Trump Standard and a Biden Standard.

Sort of like how we had a Trump Standard and a Hillary Standard.

These people never change.

Advertisement

That’s what happens when narrative becomes more important than reality.


Related:

The Hill vows to ‘review’ John Solomon’s Ukraine articles after Yovanovitch blames HIS work for false allegations (he says bring it)

Someone’s in DEEP Schiff: White House official Kash Patel suing Adam Schiff and POLITICO for leaking false Ukraine info

Once a leaker ALWAYS a leaker: Ruh-roh, even more bad news about Vindman and it’s NOT looking good for Adam Schiff

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement