You’d think after they got busted over their original Kavanaugh story the NYT would be smart enough to include the very special ‘editor’s note’ they had to add clarifying that basically their entire story is made-up NONSENSE but oh no …
So either they’re really dense OR they are deliberately leaving that little tidbit out in order to help push home the original narrative and goal of the piece, which is removing Kavanaugh and casting doubt on the SCOTUS.
Byron York was good enough to remind them of their missing note:
You know how NYT added editor's note saying Brett Kavanaugh alleged victim is said not to recall new alleged incident from 35 years ago? Times again leaves that out of new piece, this one about Dem calls for impeachment. https://t.co/Oo7fFW1AsG pic.twitter.com/HOxSycIMsR
— Byron York (@ByronYork) September 16, 2019
We’re SHOCKED!
Oh, wait.
Nope.
This is a classic example of Biden’s comment that he believes in the truth, not the facts.
— TommyHour?? (@thomashourigan1) September 16, 2019
As long as they’re morally correct, yes?
I don’t always agree with @marklevinshow but when he calls the New York Times the “New York Slimes”, he’s right.
— johnny cy (@johnnycy89) September 16, 2019
I think they also omitted an apology to the alleged victim they name in the book who wants nothing to do with this mess.
— breana (@Somthin2belivin) September 16, 2019
Recommended
Gotta let the story go viral before before you add it. Wouldn't want the bulk of readers to realize that inconvenient truth, after all.
— Jonathan Roy (@JRoy777) September 16, 2019
That narrative isn’t going to spread itself.
This is insanity.
— clemF (@FHeatherClem) September 16, 2019
This is the media in 2019.
NYT discredits itself once again. #RinseAndRepeat
— Aviva (@avivalev) September 16, 2019
We suppose it would only really be news if they weren’t discrediting themselves.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member