Yes, Next Question: Jacobin Mag Asks If CEOs Create More Value Than Workers,...
Yet ANOTHER HOAX: Racist Pro-Trump Messages Found on Tennessee College Campus Were Fabrica...
LET'S GO! Rand Paul Says He Supports Vast Majority of Trump Cabinet Nominees,...
UPDATE - ARREST MADE: Gov. Kathy Hochul Touts Safety of NYC Subway After...
Pure Projection! Musk Derangement Syndrome Sufferer AOC Says the RIGHT Controls Social Med...
Israel Foreign Ministry Takes Pope Francis to Task Over Pontiff's Claims of Israeli...
Drone Alone: Chris Christie Rolls to ABC ‘News’ Bringing Predictions of a Trump-Musk...
Risk It for the Brisket: Michigan BBQ Joint Continues Racking Up the Wins...
Oilfield Rando LAUGHING at Derpy Netflix Movie Because IT LOOKS BAD Triggers a...
Terrifying Transparency! Senator Tells CNN’s Dana Bash How Musk and X Users Upended...
Sen. Tim Scott Notes That 'Skyrocketing Costs' Are 'Bitter Aftertaste' of Biden’s Policies
Cenk Uygur ... Good Guy or Still a Bad Guy? I Have Questions
They've Learned NOTHING: Democrats' Man Problem Won't Be Fixed With Young 'Bro Whisperer'
John Fetterman: Democrat Friends Voted for Trump and MAGA Supporters Not ‘Fascists’
VIP Membership Christmas SALE: 60% Off!

COMPLICIT AF! NYT edits out KEY piece from their original Deborah Ramirez story without ANY editor's notes

Sounds like the New York Times has almost completely re-written their original story about Kavanaugh’s latest accuser, Deborah Ramirez, without making any sort of editor’s note about the edits and changes made.

Advertisement

How strange.

What makes this look even shadier is the piece they edited out is in regard to Ramirez’s inability to find any witnesses who could or would corroborate her story …

Oopsie.

Now, why would they edit out such an important fact?

Gosh, we’re super confused here … *eye roll*

Shady.

AF.

Wow.

Advertisement

Sean Davis leveled the narrative that the line in question was still there ‘in this other story’:

Give ’em Hell, Sean.

PLEASE indeed.

They won’t answer Sean’s question because if they did they’d have to admit they are trying to control the narrative rather than report the facts.

We see you, New York Times.

Advertisement

Just wow.

Unreal.

Ok, that’s not true. At this point seeing the media’s gross and blatant bias isn’t all that unreal … which is incredibly sad.


Related:

TOO FAR! Jimmy Kimmel’s ABHORRENT and violent joke about Kavanaugh BITES him right in the a*s

Looks BAD! After spending DAYS bragging about Kavanaugh GOTCHA, Michael Avenatti locks his Twitter account

Now WHY OH WHY would they do that?! NYT quickly scrubs source of yearbook hit piece on Kavanaugh

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement