OUCH! Nick Shirley Drops Receipts on Media AND Tim Walz Showing How They...
Jim Acosta Didn't Like Greg Gutfeld's Reality Check About Colbert's Cancellation (Replies...
Remember When Colbert Liked Trump (and Why)? Wow, Did THAT Backfire
Sen. Chris Murphy Did NOT Think Trump's Farewell to Colbert was Funny (He...
President Trump Flexes His Political Muscle in GOP Primaries
Greg Gutfeld and Clay Travis Spot a Reason Colbert Might Have Gotten Canceled...
Propaganda Performer: Democrats Thank Stephen Colbert Online for His Years of Service to...
Let's Compare Other Late-Night Hosts' Finale Viewership to Numbers Colbert's Media Fans Ar...
Trump Trolls Colbert with Hilarious AI Video of Throwing Him in the Dumpster
Tulsi Leaves DNI Role to Care for Husband Abraham — A Heartwarming Example...
The Snake Emerges: Adam Schiff's Heartless Jab at Tulsi Amid Her Husband's Cancer...
POPCORN! FCC Chair Brendan Carr Asks for Public Comment About ABC's 'Bona Fide...
Moan of ‘Arc’: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Has ‘Grave’ Concerns About Trump’s America 250...
Reuters Gets Shredded for Anon 'Person Familiar With the Matter' Spin on Tulsi...
Power Hungry: Wasserman Schultz Invades Majority-Black District After Redistricting Wipes...

Helloooo NARRATIVE: Brit Hume notices something all too telling in how media covers 'claims' against Trump versus Biden

Brit Hume is definitely onto something here.

Well, Real Clear Investigations is responsible FOR the piece but anytime Brit shares an article you know it is something worth reading.

Advertisement

And he was right about this one, as usual.

From Real Clear Investigations:

For three years many of journalism’s most prestigious news outlets won acclaim for making and repeating claims President Trump and his team had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. No accusation, from secret meetings in Prague to tales of prostitutes peeing on beds, was deemed unfit to print. When they wanted to signal to readers that they were conveying claims instead of facts, their hedge words of choice – “unverified” or “not yet proved” were favorites – strongly suggested that confirmation was on the way.

Call it the Trump Standard.

Now those same news outfits are observing a new standard of proof, at least when it involves former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who enjoyed a lucrative relationship with a Ukrainian gas company. This new norm demands that, absent definitive proof, assertions must be labeled as “without evidence” or said to be supported by “no evidence.”

Call it the Biden Standard.

So we have a Trump Standard and a Biden Standard.

Sort of like how we had a Trump Standard and a Hillary Standard.

These people never change.

Advertisement

That’s what happens when narrative becomes more important than reality.


Related:

The Hill vows to ‘review’ John Solomon’s Ukraine articles after Yovanovitch blames HIS work for false allegations (he says bring it)

Someone’s in DEEP Schiff: White House official Kash Patel suing Adam Schiff and POLITICO for leaking false Ukraine info

Once a leaker ALWAYS a leaker: Ruh-roh, even more bad news about Vindman and it’s NOT looking good for Adam Schiff

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement