We found this piece from Lee Smith on Margot Cleveland’s timeline and it’s such a great read we had to share it.

Here’s Smith’s tweet with the original story.

From Real Clear Investigations:

Viewed in this light, the Trump-Ukraine quid pro quo bribery narrative must compete with another explanation: Trump’s determination to get to the bottom of an underhanded years-long campaign arrayed against him. One of the first things he did after the Mueller report debunked the collusion narrative was to call the Ukranian president and ask him to help do just that.

The impeachment battle is not just about congressional probes and alleged presidential strong-arming, but about the Russiagate narrative. Anti-Trump forces in the government and media are working to vindicate their previous efforts and discredit a forthcoming Justice Department inquiry into the origins of Russiagate by again connecting Trump and a foreign power to a U.S. election.

It is significant, in this time of separate left and right media echo chambers, that an early account of Hillary Clinton campaign efforts to dig up dirt on Team Trump using Ukraine didn’t originate on the right: It was a Politico report by Kenneth P. Vogel and David Stern. (A repeat seems unlikely now: Vogel’s current employer, the New York Times, has dismissed Trump’s claims about Ukraine’s role in Russiagate as part of a right-wing conspiracy theory.)

Margot continued:

There’s a reason so many people are trying to discredit Barr before he really even gets started.

There’s just that many angles to cover because let’s be honest, this entire story has more moving pieces than an engine.

Related:

Shady AF –> Byron York notices disturbing trend with how Dems are scheduling impeachment hearing interviews

NOT falling for it! Chuck Todd’s meltdown over Trump impeachment inspires EPIC thread on media from Mollie Hemingway

GAME-FREAKIN’-CHANGER?! Glenn Beck drops Ukrainian recording so damning to Hillary no WONDER media isn’t sharing (watch)