This NYT/Kavanaugh debacle just gets worse and WORSE.

How quickly these ladies throw ‘someone else’ under the bus to protect their own backsides.

The New York Times sure can pick ’em.

But there’s something else that’s probably an even bigger issue with the story that of course was left out as well:

Gosh, that seems like a crazy HUGE conflict of interest to us.

One that she probably should have mentioned.

And hey, maybe she did and that faceless person who removed the qualifier from the original story removed her admission of knowing him as well.

HA HA HA HA HA … we still crack ourselves up sometimes.

But wait, there’s more (we feel like we say this a lot about this particular storyline):


And by absolutely fascinating we’re going to guess she means pathetic, shameful, and unprofessional.

Just a guess.

Just garbage.

Scary stuff.

Ironic, ain’t it?


Ummm dude, really? MMFA ‘rapid response’ troll accuses Michelle Malkin of being a white nationalist … there’s just 1 BIG problem

But wait, it gets WORSE! Top editors on NYT ‘news side’ felt Pogrebin and Kelly’s reporting on Kavanaugh did NOT warrant a story

‘STUNNING correction’: Ted Cruz torches 2020 Dem candidates for using NYT Kavanaugh hit-piece to push for impeachment