Oh, God.

Are we still pretending Paul Krugman actually has anything worthwhile to tweet about? Not really, but there’s plenty to make fun of.

Like this gem about the Tea Party.

From The New York Times:

One significant limitation to the Tea Party is the contradiction in its DNA: It was a mass uprising based on notions of small-government libertarianism that are popular with think tanks but not so popular with most Americans. And as Mr. Obama’s allies saw the movement, its outrage over the debt and deficit had another purpose: giving cover and a voice to those who wanted to attack the first black president — people who in some cases showed up at rallies waving signs with racist caricatures and references.

Wow.

This is a hot dumpster of stupid.

No wonder Krugman shared it.

Academic research … HA HA HA HA HA

Gosh, if that book says so.

*eye roll*

Racial animosity?

WTF?

Imagine being this bitter over a movement that hasn’t really existed in several years now. He really cannot accept people just don’t like or agree with his ideas so he paints them as racists or bigots or some other horrible stereotype so he can write them off. It’s actually pretty weak when you think about it.

Short, simple, and to the point.

Well, of course, it was going to be a failure … Al Gore invented it and stuff.

Ding ding ding.

Why mess with a streak, right?

Related:

Annnd we’re officially DEAD –> Bernie Sanders taking a swing at a punching bag is the video you NEED today (watch)

‘You don’t get to decide what I can’t handle’: Bridget Phetasy’s thread on Dave Chappelle makes one HELLUVA powerful statement

‘You are NOT a journalist’: Baltimore Repub Kimberly Klacik just thoroughly and completely NUKED Brian Stelter