Oh look, WaPo is being WaPo.
This is @washingtonpost's top headline on the March for Life pic.twitter.com/zjNhlvJXWS
— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) January 18, 2019
We know, you’re totally shocked they would disrespect and trash the March for Life because usually, they’re so good about being unbiased and objective.
OUCH, ok, we may have actually hurt ourselves writing THAT whopper …
And c’mon, this just sucks so much though, even for them. Medical consensus favors abortion ‘access’. Who says? Which medical professionals? And here we thought the whole point of the medical world was preserving and saving lives.
Who knew?
"Consensus" is not a scientific position
— Jenny Seward (@jsewrd_jane) January 18, 2019
This is WaPo we’re talking about here.
And although the turnout for M4L will far surpass the Womens’ March,guess which will get better coverage?
— Margaret OBrien (@Maggiob2016) January 18, 2019
Ooh ooh, we know!
— Wyatts Torch (@chiWVU94) January 18, 2019
But Trump?
Ok, no, that doesn’t work there.
Our bad.
Medical consensus? To whom are you directing the questions? A select few?
— Minha (@imrare_love) January 18, 2019
Recommended
They are pandering to the pro-abortion side. You know, the side that doesn’t believe an unborn child is human or alive.
Because SCIENCE.
There was once "scientific consensus" that the world was flat and the sun revolved around the earth.
— Danielle Gervais (@TheRose34) January 18, 2019
scientific fact: a baby in the womb is a person
— Some random thoughts (@someideasnstuff) January 18, 2019
True.
As a former fetus, I second this.
— John Norcali (@JohnNorcali) January 18, 2019
Gosh, us too.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member