Oh look, WaPo is being WaPo.
— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) January 18, 2019
We know, you’re totally shocked they would disrespect and trash the March for Life because usually, they’re so good about being unbiased and objective.
OUCH, ok, we may have actually hurt ourselves writing THAT whopper …
And c’mon, this just sucks so much though, even for them. Medical consensus favors abortion ‘access’. Who says? Which medical professionals? And here we thought the whole point of the medical world was preserving and saving lives.
"Consensus" is not a scientific position
— Jenny Seward (@jsewrd_jane) January 18, 2019
This is WaPo we’re talking about here.
And although the turnout for M4L will far surpass the Womens’ March,guess which will get better coverage?
— Margaret OBrien (@Maggiob2016) January 18, 2019
Ooh ooh, we know!
— Wyatts Torch (@chiWVU94) January 18, 2019
Ok, no, that doesn’t work there.
Medical consensus? To whom are you directing the questions? A select few?
— Minha (@imrare_love) January 18, 2019
They are pandering to the pro-abortion side. You know, the side that doesn’t believe an unborn child is human or alive.
There was once "scientific consensus" that the world was flat and the sun revolved around the earth.
— Danielle Gervais (@TheRose34) January 18, 2019
scientific fact: a baby in the womb is a person
— Some random thoughts (@someideasnstuff) January 18, 2019
As a former fetus, I second this.
— John Norcali (@JohnNorcali) January 18, 2019
Gosh, us too.