If you want to see textbook hypocrisy you need look no further than the way the Left is trying to destroy Tucker Carlson for comments he made about illegal immigrants while turning a blind eye to the open and obvious anti-Semitism from leaders of the Women’s March.
Then again, nobody does hypocrisy better than our friends on the Left but we digress.
Women’s March, Sponsors Silent on Anti-Semitism Allegations https://t.co/yUp38B4lSg via @Xan_DeSanctis pic.twitter.com/8fqGX8e4uK
— National Review (@NRO) December 20, 2018
From the National Review:
In the wake of this disarray, the group is planning its third March on Washington. The lack of basic organization is fairly evident: The Women’s March website has a sponsorship page that lists partners for the 2017 March on Washington rather than the one that took place this past January, and their press contact failed to answer National Review’s request for a full list of confirmed sponsors for the upcoming January 19 event.
National Review contacted more than 20 of the most prominent organizations among the listed sponsors, asking whether they’re sponsoring the Women’s March again in January and asking for comment on the anti-Semitism allegations levied in the Tablet report.
The vast majority of those 2017 sponsors never replied — including pro-abortion groups such as Emily’s List, NARAL, the National Organization for Women, and the National Abortion Federation; unions such as the ACLU, AFL-CIO, the SEIU, and the health-care union 1199SEIU; and progressive outfits such as the NAACP, GLAAD, MoveOn.org, and the Human Rights Campaign.
They never replied. Shocking.
It helps that the media, by and large, has remained silent about the most recent allegations. https://t.co/DWucqLd1Gd
— Griswold Christmas Vacation (@HashtagGriswold) December 20, 2018
Yup.
They’re too busy painting Tucker as a bigoted, racist who hates orphans and kicks puppies.
It’s ridiculous.
This is why these boycott campaigns have nothing to do with principle or opposing bigotry. These people don't care about opposing bigotry when it comes to their own side. https://t.co/fphz8bheq0
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 20, 2018
Ok for me but not for thee.
Yup.
Seriously, compare this to the coverage of the Tucker Carlson boycotts and media demands for comments from his advertisers.
If you're going to insist on those tactics to fight bad speech, you better be consistent or don't expect to be taken seriously.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 20, 2018
Consistency from the media? Psh. Don’t be silly.
CNN has been all over the Carlson story., but where are on the antisemitism within that major progressive organization?
They have 2 stories that mention the WM in December. One praising the Women's March and the other one simply mentioning it as something that happened.
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 20, 2018
Ya’ don’t say.
I almost just want to pin this @iowahawkblog tweet about the current state of our national press: https://t.co/HJBCwIPVc5
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 20, 2018
Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) May 9, 2013
‘Nuff said.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member