The Supreme Court’s 1963 ruling in Brady v. Maryland found that “the government’s withholding of evidence that is material to the determination of either guilt or punishment of a criminal defendant violates the defendant’s constitutional right to due process.”
During a confirmation hearing for one of President Biden’s judicial nominees Kato Crews, Republican Sen. John Kennedy stumped Crews with a question about how he goes about analyzing a Brady motion. Biden’s nominee did not know what Sen. Kennedy was talking about:
Sen. Kennedy: “Do you know what a Brady motion is?”
Biden judicial nominee Kato Crews: “It’s not coming to mind at the moment … I believe that the Brady case involved something regarding the Second Amendment.”
— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) March 22, 2023
In a word, YIKES.
Oh dear God in Heaven save us.
— JawjaJim (@JimJawja) March 22, 2023
It is not coming to mind because history has been replaced by DEI🙄
— JAG (@Juls24Julie) March 22, 2023
what is it with Team Biden and nominating people who know less about law than me https://t.co/xcfcav6Fnm
— Brandon Howell (@BrandonDHowell) March 22, 2023
Team Biden has different priorities when it comes to many of their nominees.
Apparently, several of Joe Biden’s judicial nominees were sick the day they taught law at law school. https://t.co/Q9tSoeDCJW
— Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) March 22, 2023
Recommended
Sure seems that way.
***
Related:
Sen. John Kennedy’s ‘gentle’ review of the Biden presidency (at CPAC) is *chef’s kiss*
Sen. John Kennedy gets Biden judicial nominee to admit lying to exploit and worsen racial tensions
***
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member