During the Senate confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson the judge was asked to define “woman.” As you recall, her infamous answer was that she’s “not a biologist” and therefore not qualified to answer the question.
However, Stephen King is an author but also seems to have a grip on biology that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson wasn’t willing to recognize:
If men could have babies, abortion would be a scrament.
— Stephen King (@StephenKing) May 12, 2022
We assume “scrament” translates to “sacrament,” but the most glaring part of that tweet is the science admission:
Stephen King admits men can't have babies.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) May 12, 2022
Democrats and the media have assured me they can. https://t.co/gXxzr81qYs
— Mike LaChance (@MikeLaChance33) May 12, 2022
Can we get a biologist to make a final determination on this?
How transphobic of you… I'm literally shaking.
— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) May 12, 2022
The extreme left finally concedes men cannot have babies.
Once in a while, this guy says something that actually makes sense. 👇 https://t.co/Dxs0J488G3
— Luis B. Aramburu 🇸🇲 (@luisbaram) May 12, 2022
If the Babylon Bee hadn’t been suspended and tweeted what King said they’d risk suspension yet again.
Reporting this transphobic hate-> https://t.co/tjVeO26okw
— PolitiFact Bias (@PolitiFactBias) May 12, 2022
If men could get pregnant, I would continue to oppose the killing of unborn babies.
The central concept all these stupid little “arguments” attempt to avoid: There is a living human killed by every abortion. https://t.co/5DSjuGcjVF
— Fuzzy Chimp 🇺🇸 (@fuzzychimpcom) May 12, 2022
And that’s the bottom line the pro-aborts would rather ignore.
OMG YOU GUISE >
Transphobic if I ever saw it.
Literally shaking right now.
I Can't Even.
Did I do this right? https://t.co/CATeTCiU32
— Artist_Angie: Sensei of Sarcasm (@Artist_Angie) May 12, 2022