HOO BOY! Brit Hume rolling eyes at NYT & WaPo's Trump/Russia Pulitzer TRIGGERS blue check journos

The New York Times congratulated themselves on Monday for Pulitzer Prized they (and the Washington Post) are being awarded:

The New York Times shares the Pulitzer in National Reporting with The @WashingtonPost for coverage that unearthed possible ties between Russia and President Trump’s inner circle https://t.co/l4rodIjHy3

— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 16, 2018

“Possible ties”? Brit Hume rolled his eyes as only he can:

Remember when they only gave out prizes for stories after they panned out? Good times. https://t.co/RhD54qRHnh

— Brit Hume (@brithume) April 17, 2018

CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski and CNBC’s John Harwood were NOT amused by Hume’s Pulitzer skepticism:

yeah they’ve panned out https://t.co/f0kLo8hBlV

— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) April 17, 2018

https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/986053946446839808

Hume pointed out to Steve Schmidt that it was the NY Times that said the stories were about “possible” ties:

Are you suggesting there are no ties between Russians and the Presidents inner circle ? I don’t understand your point

— Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) April 17, 2018

Reread the Times’ tweet. It speaks of “possible ties.” Perhaps you should ask the Times what they mean.

— Brit Hume (@brithume) April 17, 2018

For many, being awarded a Pulitzer for something that remains under investigation with details as yet to be known is a ridiculous notion:

https://twitter.com/TheRealBepo/status/986039933658951680

For "possible ties" you get a trophy???? https://t.co/M8iBgXl2H4

— Russ Belden (@russ_belden) April 17, 2018

Recommended

Trimming the Fat: ABC Slashes The View's Hosts’ Salaries and Wardrobe Budget, More Cuts Coming

Warren Squire

Advertisement

Meh. It's like the Nobel Peace Prize. You don't have to do anything for those, either.

— Evocatus (@Evocatus425) April 17, 2018

Forget it Brit, it’s DCtown. https://t.co/B3xZPCtBhg

— Keith W. Preston (@KeithWpreston) April 17, 2018

Now the Pulitzer becomes as meaningless as the post-Obama Nobel Peace Prize.

— Lewis Boss (@bosser_15) April 16, 2018

Awarded a Pulitzer for a thing that did not actually exist! pic.twitter.com/muzHvRUDKc

— RightWired (@_donaldson) April 16, 2018

***

Related:

BA-DUM-CH! Brit Hume ZINGS Stormy Daniels appearing at the Cohen hearing and it’s a DOOZY

‘THUGS with law degrees.’ Brit Hume shares piece about the Mueller ‘trap’ and the Left just can’t DEAL