Disgusting Obama Lackey David Axelrod Dances on Graves of Texas Flooding Victims for...
Truth, Justice, and Free Stuff for Illegals: James Gunn Says Superman Is 'An...
The Hill Spins Justice Brown Jackson's Dislike of Jurisprudence Into an 'Independent Strea...
Let's Talk FACTS: While Dems Act Like Ghouls, Chris Martz Sets the Record...
Never Change, Guardian! British Paper Says the Solution to Populism Is Revisiting Failed...
Take the L, Dana! Scott Bessent SMACKS DOWN Bash's Yale Budget Labs Talking...
HHS.gov: 'Slashing Stifling Regulations Can Improve Healthcare in America'
'If So, He Is Badly Mistaken': John Bolton Holds That 'Trump Crossed a...
J.K. Rowling Blames 'Useful Idiots' for Making It Possible for Abusers to Hide...
Jared Polis Creates CRINGE Anti-GOP Video That Explains Why Democrats' Approval Has Crater...
'Remotely Like This': Lawrence Summers Sounds the Alarm About Deficits and Debts
Charles Payne: 'The Financial Media Acted As Arsonists This Year'
As Democrats Show Their Ugliness, Kristi Noem Highlights a Genuine Hero of the...
DataRepublican Exposes Vile, Hate-Filled Lefty 'Mrs. Butters' Dancing on Graves and HOO BO...
Of All the Ugly, Frothy-Mouthed, Hate-Filled Posts on TX Floods, This Lefty 'Butters'...

Renewed push behind SHARE Act revives myths about gun 'silencers,' death wishes; Dana Loesch schools

Politico reports Tuesday that Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) have revived his “controversial” push to pass the Sportsmen Heritage and Recreational Enhancement (SHARE) Act, which would make it easier for gun owners to purchase noise suppressors, better but less accurately known as “silencers.”

Advertisement

It appears that the talking points favored by Democrats who oppose the legislation have sunk in with the public, or vice versa.

For example, Sen. Chris Murphy has accused the NRA of trying to get rid of what he calls an “important gun safety feature” — the bang a firearm makes when you pull the trigger. Meanwhile, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand argued that witnesses to a murder might not hear the gunshot, making it more difficult for police to track down the shooter.

One more time: silencers do not make guns “silent.” People seem to be hard of hearing when it comes to gun facts.

Speaking of, it’s Everytown for Gun Safety … which doesn’t like the idea of making guns safer when it comes to legal gun owners and their hearing.

Advertisement

No one needs a silencer, or only thugs need silencers … make up your minds!

Hey, look, a death wish:

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/IrisRimon/status/907661283918565377

“Kill them in silence.”

https://twitter.com/_Dmart_/status/907656781123420160

https://twitter.com/DanielLee1860/status/907662952026791936

https://twitter.com/tnoutlaw73/status/907657174243057664

https://twitter.com/bob_novoa/status/907683641664434176

https://twitter.com/tnoutlaw73/status/907657479919734784

Advertisement

Politico reports:

Under the 1934 National Firearms Act, silencers — also known as suppressors — are treated similarly to machine guns or explosives. The waiting time to purchase such devices is far longer than for handguns or other weapons, as much as nine months or more. Buyers must submit fingerprints and a photograph in order to purchase a silencer, and federal law enforcement agencies keep a record of who buys the devices. There is also a $200 transfer tax on silencers.

Whoever came up with the term “silencer” is probably the same person who decided children of illegal immigrants are all “dreamers.”

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement