Now, let’s start with something basic. This story is about allegations. We have not heard from the other side and fair-minded people typically wait until they hear from the other side before drawing conclusions. And while there is video of the moment where the alleged sexual assault occurs, as you will see in a moment, the video doesn’t make it 100% clear whether the allegations of sexual assault are true. That’s why there isn’t a content warning before we share the video—because it’s not explicit enough to be sure whether an assault occurred. The video is just not shot at the right angle to answer that question definitively. So, we are not passing judgment on whether or not these allegations are true. We are simply relaying the allegations to you.
With all of that in mind, let’s proceed.
The core of the allegations are pretty well summed up by this post:
HOLY CRAP
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 10, 2026
A male pretending to be a female joined girl’s wrestling and beat up a girl and allegedly stuck his fingers in her vagina
Video shows his hand between her legs
The Puyallup School District in Washington then reportedly covered it up.
This dude should be ARRESTED… https://t.co/LGSqMXqpw8 pic.twitter.com/8Kiuc9U6vL
The transgender student—that is, a boy now claiming to be a girl—is the darker skinned one in a gray and black uniform who’s always facing away from the camera, and is always on top. The actual girl who alleges sexual assault is the one underneath in the blue and black uniform. You can definitely see he had the opportunity to commit the alleged act, but you can’t see if he did. To be blunt, you can’t quite see what he did with the relevant hand.
The person who first broke this story is Brandi Kruse, who runs a podcast called unDivided. She wrote a post on Patreon discussing it, here:
EXCLUSIVE: A high school wrestler in Washington state says she was sexually violated by a trans opponent – and that public school employees broke the law by not reporting it. Our story: https://t.co/IFcrrO7uPb pic.twitter.com/MqClKewN9L
— Brandi Kruse (@BrandiKruse) February 9, 2026
From the article:
Kallie Keeler has been wrestling her entire life.
The 16-year-old sophomore at Rogers High School in Puyallup says she’s never experienced anything like what happened during a December 6 match with in-district rival Emerald Ridge High School.
A couple of minutes into the 190-pound bout, Kallie found herself face down on the mat – with her opponent’s arm between her legs and fingers pressing into her vagina. Hard.
What happened – and didn’t happen – in the two months that followed highlights the extent to which public school districts in Washington state will go to to protect trans athletes at the expense of girls – and even at the expense of following the law.
The alleged assault
Video taken by Kallie’s mom on December 6 captures the disgust and panic in Kallie’s face. She tries to mouth something to her mom: ‘Her fingers are in my (vagina).’
Her mom can’t make out what she’s saying and is on the wrong side of the mat to see what’s happening to her daughter. The referee is also out of the line of sight.
‘I don’t know what she said. I don’t know why her face looked like that,’ her mom can be heard saying to someone off camera.
Traumatized and confused, Kallie decided to let her opponent pin her.
‘I just wanted the match to be over,’ the teen told me, her hands grasping together. I could tell she felt awkward even talking about it.
…
As she waited for a break in action to inform her coach of what she felt like was an intentional sexual assault, a coach from an opposing team came up to her and told her something that would make the ordeal even worse.
Kallie’s opponent was a biological boy.
‘I was really shocked,’ Kallie said.
She had no idea. No one had told her before the match.
To be clear, Kallie intended to tell her coach what happened before knowing her opponent was a boy. But now, she felt violated in more ways than one.
She goes on to allege that the school knew about the allegations that she was assaulted and the school had a legal obligation to report the matter to the sheriff’s office, but they allegedly didn’t inform the sheriff’s office until Ms. Kruse started looking into it—nearly two months after the fact—much like Loudon County. ‘Me Too,’ unless a transgender person is involved, apparently.
Ms. Kruse doesn’t mention the name of the alleged transgender student but Reduxx claims to have identified him:
🚨The male wrestler accused of sexually assaulting his female opponent during a high school wrestling match is set to compete as a "girl" in the Washington state championships.
— REDUXX (@reduxx) February 10, 2026
The wrestler can now be identified as Taufa'ase'e Tei, also known as "Trixie."https://t.co/W1z01rDYtk
You might have also noted that Ms. Kruse mentioned that she personally spoke with Ms. Keeler. You can see that interview as part of this segment, here:
(This author's router is showing the video as restricted. Hopefully, you can see it.)
One thing we thought was particularly interesting is that this is not the first time Ms. Keeler has wrestled boys. When she was much younger, when she believed the differences in the sexes is less pronounced, and there was a shortage of opponents to wrestle against, she would sometimes be paired up with a boy. But, crucially, she was always asked for her consent before the match.
And that might turn out to be critical. Allow us to ‘lawsplain...’
Look, suppose you are walking down the street and Mike Tyson gets into an argument with you and punches you. Let’s imagine you remain conscious after the first punch (a very dubious assumption for most random people—even at this age, he’d probably lay out most of us in one punch) and you fight back. Then the police arrive. Well, if you can prove Mr. Tyson threw the first punch, he is likely to be arrested and eventually convicted of assault/battery. And the only reason why you wouldn’t be convicted of the same is because you only fought back in self-defense.
But on the other hand, if Mike Tyson climbed into the ring with another boxer, and started punching him, typically no crime would be seen as being committed, even if he does lay out his opponent in one punch. That’s because consent is a complete defense to an allegation of assault and battery and thus if you get into a proper boxing match with someone, you are seen as consenting to being hit. You might not want to get hit, or you might think you can dodge every punch, but the law says you are consenting to being hit if you enter into a boxing match. The same applies to any sport where contact with your opponent or even contact with a ball or something like that can happen. If you play football, you consent to be tackled. This includes contact that would be technically against the rules, because everyone knows that some rule breaking just happens in any sport.
On the other hand, imagine you are playing football and someone actually pulls out a gun and shoots you, like in the thoroughly ridiculous movie, ‘The Last Boy Scout?’
Well, the law would say it is outside of the zone of consent. You consent to the risk of tackles after the whistle blows, face masks, and so on. You’re not consenting to the risk of being shot. Or, for that matter, Evander Holyfield did not consent to a risk of having a huge chunk of his ear bit off by Mike Tyson, when they fought back in 1997 and Tyson could have gone to prison for that as well.
So, the point is that consent is the line dividing lawful contact and even injury during sports, versus criminal assault and battery.
Applied here, Ms. Keeler obviously consented to be touched in way that would ordinarily be assault and battery—that’s just the nature of wrestling, just as it is in the nature of boxing. As in, if you were walking down the street and someone jumped you and tried to hold you immobile on the ground, that amounts to multiple assaults and batteries. But in an ordinary wrestling match, she consented to what is ordinarily assault and battery. But she didn’t consent to every possible assault and battery.
And, not to put too fine a point on it, but logic says that if two people are wrestling, sometimes private parts are going to be touched. So just as a football player consents to a certain amount of ‘fouling’ when playing that sport, Ms. Keeler would probably be found to have consented to brief, unintentional touching in those areas. But Keeler was alleging a hard, and sustained touching that she felt crossed any line and the question is whether or not that was in the range of her consent. This is where Ms. Kruse’s YouTube video is excellent, talking about the issue at around the seven-minute mark. She claims to have spoken with two experts in the field who told her that yes, brief touches happen but what Ms. Keeler described amounted a flagrant foul. They also said that it looked intentional because there was no justification for going between her legs at all at this point in the match. Of course these are only allegations, but it gets to the heart of the matter. If you believe Ms. Kruse’s experts, then what Ms. Keeler described was not only ordinarily a sexual assault, but it cannot be described as part of what she consented to by participating in the sport.
But there is a bigger consent problem: According to Keeler, she was never told her opponent was a boy, and she was never asked if she consented to wrestling with a boy. Furthermore, in the video the coach of her team allegedly told Keeler that if he knew the other wrestler was a boy, he wouldn’t have allowed the match to go on. That suggests that while she consented to wrestling and all that entailed, she didn’t consent to wrestle against a boy, at all. And if she didn’t consent in a way the law would recognize … then every moment in that match was an assault and battery, even if Keeler’s allegations of sexual assault are false.
Which is important because as far as we can tell, any argument about any touching is likely to be plagued by a ‘he said, she said’ dispute. If it turns into a criminal case, a jury might believe that there is a reasonable doubt as to whether or not this alleged sexual assault was intentional, how long it went on, and so on. But if the prosecutors argued that Keeler didn't consent to the wrestling match against a boy at all, that would make prosecution, much, much easier.
Or … for all we know, Keeler signed a form where they mentioned wrestling with boys was a possibility somewhere in the fine print so that she technically did consent to wrestle with a boy. So, without more information, we are not sure we can say that this ‘global’ consent issue is a slam dunk. But if we in law enforcement in that area, we would definitely be looking into this issue.
But it also highlights another reason why sex segregation is justified in sports, especially in contact sports, that shouldn’t be breached over transgender issues. If a boy tackles a girl in football, and ends up touching her chest, the question will often be whether he meant to do that or not. Was he using the occasion as a cover for a chance to grope? Or is the girl falsely accusing him for an advantage? If sports are segregated by sex, the opportunities for this kind of controversy go down significantly. Obviously, it is possible for this sort of thing to happen if we have sex segregated sports, but let’s be very blunt: Men and boys are just more likely to do this sort of thing, and that reason alone justifies sex segregation. But further, it becomes a potential source of controversy and division. Boys will be rightfully accused, but they will also be falsely accused and a school doesn’t need these headaches when they are trying to educate their students.
Some reactions:
— MF🇧🇷🇮🇱 (@mrcfoz) February 10, 2026
If this allegation is true, that’s not a sports controversy. That’s a crime. Protect girls’ sports and privacy with clear, enforceable rules, and let law enforcement handle assault claims. Also: stop laundering rage bait. Name the school, the event, the police report, or it’s…
— rowdyamerican (@rowdyamerican69) February 10, 2026
The cut off text:
Also: stop laundering rage bait. Name the school, the event, the police report, or it’s just engagement farming.
Except there is an allegation that law enforcement wasn’t informed until the controversy rose up. And, of course, that is the worst way for such an investigation to go. If the police were informed before the controversy erupted, they might have interviewed the alleged assailant and gotten an honest answer out of him. Now he is likely to ‘lawyer up’ and possibly refuse to answer questions at all.
Gender verification in esports is a game-changer—why hasn’t wrestling caught up yet?
— Nothing() (@bartolomeiwf) February 10, 2026
Esports, as in basically competitive video game playing? We would tend to think that if there is one area where sex segregation is hard to defend, it is there.
It’s wrestling, I’m not on the “she was sexually assaulted train” easy solution, don’t wrestle males. Done.
— Brian Achenbach (@brian_ache85731) February 10, 2026
I'm don't feel bad. She should have refused to compete. Women bring this on themselves.
— Kenny Powers (@OrangeBlackTeal) February 10, 2026
Don’t you love it when a person feels the need to comment before they read the article?
Her face says everything. Look at the horror. Clearly this was not a normal wrestling move she’d experienced before. She even uses female pronouns for this guy. That’s how conditioned she is to tolerate the intolerable. Dear God it’s so awful to see her facial expression.
— Mary Weller (@MWellertXc) February 10, 2026
She used female pronouns because she didn't know it was a dude.
Was it intentional? It doesn’t matter. A young girl should never be placed in a position like this to wonder. I’m incensed.
— FugitiveMama (@fugitivemama) February 9, 2026
God this is absolutely ridiculous. I live on the Eastside and a good chunk of parents don’t mind, or actively support trans males competing in female sports. If I were to guess it’s for the sole purpose of supporting something that Trump opposes, and not based on any rational…
— AKA JL (@Livermore_BTC) February 12, 2026
The cut off text:
If I were to guess it’s for the sole purpose of supporting something that Trump opposes, and not based on any rational principles of logic or fairness.
Certainly not based on rationality. Rational adults wouldn’t allow any of this nonsense to go on.
Not ‘trans’ opponent…. By a boy pretending to be to be a girl. We need to stop using the language of the left.
— Michael PD (@MPDgrampsof4) February 9, 2026
Fair enough.
Finally:
If you let me play, I might be sexually assaulted.
— XX-XY Athletics (@xx_xyathletics) February 10, 2026
Add it to the list. https://t.co/TbYSWCK1xp pic.twitter.com/cVPlkhgyfN
This is the issue that divides actual, principled feminism from neo-Marxists in feminist clothing.
RELATED: Punishing the Winner? Somehow, Sam Darnold Has to Pay California $14,000 For Winning the Super Bowl
Legal Action Launched to Stop Puberty Blocker Experiment ON CHILDREN in the United Kingdom
Horror Show in Maryland: Police Neglect of a Homeless Camp Might Lead to Residents Being Evicted
DHS Lawyer Who Asked To Be Held in Contempt Leaves Minnesota Detail
BREAKING: An NYT Interview With Biden Just Undermined Thousands of His Late Pardons (A Deep Dive)
Editor’s Note: The radical transgender activists want to take away girls’ opportunities, their privacy, and their safety. They even want to force you to call a man a woman.
But there are four lights.
Help us continue to report on their radical agenda. Join Twitchy VIP today and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member