Cleanup on Aisle CNN: Tom Cotton Mops the Floor With Dana Bash Pushing...
Yes, They Want Our Guns: Raphael Warnock Supports Harris Enforcing Mandatory Gun Buybacks
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Duality of Kamala: Jen Rubin Gushes Over Harris Being More Progressive AND More...
Ana Navarro Tries to Dunk on Trump and the Virgin Mary, Ends Up...
COPE: John Cryer Lives Up to His Surname, Whines About Not Trusting Polls...
UH OH: Guess Which Age Group Identifies LEAST With Democrats (And It Doesn't...
WTF: Springfield, Ohio Residents Say Haitian Immigrants Are Capturing and Eating Wild Anim...
Dear NYT: It's Not 'Silly' to Hold Donald Trump and Kamala Harris to...
Bernie Sanders Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: Kamala's Policy Flip Flops Are...
Kamala Harris Likes Doritos While the Associated Press Prefers Cheesy Puff Pieces
Tim Walz Is a Lying Liar Who LIES: Watch As He Says It’s...
It's (D)ifferent When THEY Do It: Watch Sexist, Racist Lefties Mispronounce Kamala's Name
Guy Who Wants Massive Unrealized Capital Gains Tax Also Says Families Should Be...
Trump War Room Compares Cost of Border Wall to Illegal Immigration and WOW...

Bulwark's Charlie Sykes calls out Charles C.W. Cooke for being an insufficiently Principled Conservative™

In case you missed it, yesterday, former President Donald Trump issued a statement claiming that when said that the fact that he lost the 2020 election meant that the U.S. Constitution could be gutted in order to reinstate him as president, he didn’t actually say that thing he said:

Advertisement

He’s completely full of it, of course.

By now, hopefully you, too, are tired of Donald Trump being stupid. No matter how awful and loathsome you find President Joe Biden, Donald Trump is awful and loathsome, too, and his comments about suspending the Constitution should be the last of all the final straws that broke the camel’s back.

National Review’s Charles C.W. Cooke effectively made that argument in a post he wrote yesterday:

Here’s how Cooke’s post concludes:

Why does this happen? Beats me. At this stage, literally nothing is being achieved by it — except, of course, to drive independents and mainstream Republicans from the coalition. No laws are changed. No judges are appointed. No arguments are won. No thorny topics are broached. America doesn’t improve. Conservatism doesn’t improve. The GOP doesn’t improve. Everything just gets dumber and more cultish. As there should be, there is a limited supply of political energy in this country, and for some reason, the American Right has decided to spend an inordinate amount of it defending a man who is now serving nothing except for his own boredom and his own ego. At some point, conservative-leaning voters are going to notice that all Trump cares about now is the pretense that he won the election of 2020, and that, in order to push that idea, he will happily destroy anything and everything that gets in his way. Until then, I must ask: Are you not tired of this crap?

Advertisement

In case it’s not abundantly clear, Charles C.W. Cooke is tired of this crap. He’s been tired of Donald Trump’s crap for years. But he also hasn’t let the fact that he’s been tired of Donald Trump’s crap for years prevent him from acknowledging positive things that happened while Trump was president or from acknowledging when liberals and Resistance conservatives’ criticisms of Trump were baseless or unreasonable.

And that, in eyes of The Bulwark’s Charlie Sykes, makes Cooke unclean, and unworthy of respect:

Charlie Sykes is here to administer the purity tests, everybody. Amazing how he still has time to do that in between doing Bulwark things and being an MSNBC contributor. He is supported, of course, by his Bulwark colleague Bill Kristol, who is apparently very fond of this line from Sykes’ “Morning Shots” newsletter:

Advertisement

Anyway, we know exactly where Cooke was. We know where Sykes was, too: he was claiming to be a Principled Conservative™ who opposed Trump in the name of Principled Conservatism™.

Cooke hasn’t wavered in his convictions; Sykes et al. have demonstrated that they have no convictions.

That’s it in a nutshell.

Did Noam Blum have the Principled Conservatives™ pegged or what?

***

Related:

Charlie Sykes is really depending on Donald Trump to distract from the fact that The Bulwark backed the wrong guy

Tom Nichols celebrates himself — and some very heroic friends — for coming to terms with what it means to be ‘conservative’ these days

***

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement