Patronizing Beta Male And Senate Hopeful Assumes Women Are Stupid
Daily Beast: ‘Leading Catholic Newspaper’ Slams JD Vance for Putting MAGA Over Jesus
In Response to Gov. Mills' Nonsense, Douglass Mackey Drops the REAL George Washington...
Jasmine Crockett: Trump Wants to Target 'Anybody Who Has a Little Bit of...
Pelosi: Trump's Statements About Ilhan Omar 'Reflect a Disturbing Lack of Understanding of...
Shocked in 2021, Still Shocked in 2026: Hospitals Haven't Changed, and Recent Insane...
Cornel West Explains on CNN What It Means to ‘N****rize’ a Whole Country
FAKE, FAKE, FAKE! Ilhan Omar LOSES It When Asked Why She Didn't Follow...
Nurse Who Said He'd Deny Conservatives Anesthesia During Surgery Loses License
Man Impersonates FBI Agent, Says He Has a Court Order (and Pizza Cutter)...
‘Batman’ Demands Santa Clara City Council Find a Spine and Do Something About...
Anti-Ice Activists Surround Restaurant After Mistaking TSA Officers for Federal Agents
MN Commissioner Begs for Eviction Ban So Illegals Can Hide from ICE and...
Return to Sender: Gavin Newsom Pledges 'Aid' To Tennessee But There's Just One...
'Free Is a LIE': Zohran Mamdani's Tone on FREE STUFF Has Magically Changed...

Blue-checked journo and self-described 'historian' makes historically illiterate case against Clarence Thomas (that also reeks of sexism)

In case you missed it, ailing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has vaulted to the front of the line in the race to see who the Left hates the most right now. And it’s all thanks to some text messages his wife Ginni Thomas reportedly sent to GOP Rep. Mark Meadows in early January 2021.

Advertisement

The calls for impeachment are growing louder and louder, and, despite how ridiculous they sound, liberals appear determined to lean into it as hard as they can. Here’s self-described “historian” and Politico Magazine contributing editor Joshua Zeitz with his contribution to the discourse:

You know, for a historian, Joshua doesn’t seem super well versed in history.

From the ABA Journal:

Johnson nominated Fortas for chief justice, and with the prospect of a Richard Nixon presidency looming months later, Southern senators from both parties began resisting pressure from Johnson for a fast-tracked confirmation. And in the subsequent Fortas vetting, opponents found what they needed to deny him the post.

First, there was a $15,000 payment to Fortas for a summer teaching post. Not only was this considered an extraordinary supplement to his $39,500 government salary, the post was funded by former law firm clients. More significantly for a sitting justice, Fortas revealed he had never stopped advising Johnson—attending White House staff meetings, advising on judicial nominations and reporting on private deliberations by the court.

Faced with a Senate filibuster, Fortas asked Johnson to withdraw his name. He returned to the court only to face another scandal when Life magazine revealed he had been receiving regular payments from Louis Wolfson, a former Wall Street client convicted of fraud. Under their agreement, Fortas was to receive $20,000 a year for life. He had returned the money, but only after Wolfson was indicted.

Advertisement

Wow. That’s pretty bad, no?

But we’re still waiting to hear how Clarence Thomas is way worse than Abe Fortas because of stuff his wife did. Looks like we’re gonna have to wait a while.

That’s actually a very good and interesting point. The vigor with which the media and liberals are going after Clarence Thomas over Ginni Thomas really does reek of sexism.

That’s what it effectively boils down to.

***

Related:

Vox’s Ian Millhiser reminds us about the time that ‘Clarence Thomas successfully conspired […] to overturn the result of the 2000 election’

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement