So apparently Benghazi is Bush's fault, too.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) January 23, 2013
Plus ça change …
Bush Derangement Syndrome is alive and well. During today’s Senate hearing on Benghazi, Dick Durbin pathetically fawned over Hillary Clinton:
Ah Durbin, your Durbinosity remains undiminished. No water too heavy for you to carry.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahDispatch) January 23, 2013
Thankfully, he eventually stopped drooling long enough to tie the deadly attacks to weapons of mass destruction. In Iraq. Because Bush.
Sen. Durbin brings up Bush admin's insistence that Iraq had WMD's – in arguing that Obama admin is not engaged in a #Benghazi coverup
— Josh Levs (@JoshLevs) January 23, 2013
Sorry, that was Sen. Durbin: Talk about cover up: Bush admin told all of us Iraq had WMD and we went to war over it.
— Laura Rozen (@lrozen) January 23, 2013
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/294111313637027840
On charges of cover-up, Sen Durbin comparing Bush admin false charge of WMD in Iraq as pretext for war. "Let's have a hearing on that"
— Elise Labott (@EliseLabott) January 23, 2013
Since Bush “misinformed” us about WMD, it’s totally OK that we were misinformed about what killed four Americans in Benghazi. Right? Right???
Durbin invokes Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to insist it's okay for the initial explanations of the Benghazi attack to be false.
— Jim Geraghty (@jimgeraghty) January 23, 2013
https://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/294111265578684416
It’s only fair.
But BOOOOOOSH!
— Stephen Green (@VodkaPundit) January 23, 2013
And here we go… BLAME BUUUUUUUUSSSSSHHHH!!! #lesigh
— Kemberlee Kaye (@KemberleeKaye) January 23, 2013
Seriously still blaming Bush. #BenghaziHearings
— ¡El Sooopèrr! ن c137 (@SooperMexican) January 23, 2013
Of course Durbin takes opportunity to blame Bush for something!!
— Flo Patterson (@fpatterson1050) January 23, 2013
Surprise!
You know, Dick, Hillary also thought Iraq had WMDs:
Durbin surely remembers that Senator Clinton was among the most outspoken Ds in favor of the Iraq War and that her husband warned of WMDs?
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) January 23, 2013
And you guys went through this before:
Sen. Durbin, we had hearings on Iraqi WMD. In 2004.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) January 23, 2013
https://twitter.com/Rschrim/status/294113485229543424
But what difference does that make?
Wait, what? Durbin is going into WMD and Iraq?
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) January 23, 2013
https://twitter.com/amandacarpenter/status/294111231210573825
Durbin strokes #Hillary, make her smile and relax, blames Benghazi coverup on Bush, brings up WMD. What a slimeball. #Illinois is ashamed.
— BAMoonshadow (@BAMoonshadow) January 23, 2013
Red Herring: Dick Durbin drops the Iraq WMD line knowing full well entire world believed they were there – Benghazi was purposely misleading
— Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) January 23, 2013
WOW!!! Sen. Durbin GOES THERE, brings up Bush's Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction bull-hockey.
— Jen Deaderick (@jendeaderick) January 23, 2013
Are videos WMDs? RT @KevinWGlass: Sen. Dick Durbin thinks the important part of Benghazi is 5 words: "Iraqi weapons of mass destruction."
— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) January 23, 2013
https://twitter.com/sowhatrusaying/status/294111988630556672
Dick Durbin re-litigates the Iraq War. Didn't he hear what #SecClinton said: #whatdifferencedoesthatmakenow?
— Elizabeth (@MediaLizzy) January 23, 2013
Dirty Dick Durbin blaming Bush now?! This man is disgusting to the fullest sense! How do these people keep getting reelected! #benghazi
— Victor Warden (@lightning7876) January 23, 2013
The problem is TOTALLY WMDs Durbin. If WMDs are terrorists and an inept State Dept. Also, if they're Libyan and not Iraqi. Actually, no.
— Allie Gravitt (@alliegravitt) January 23, 2013
The take away after todays hearings: We should have investigated WMD more. #WhatDifferenceDoesItMake
— Jennifer Tammaro (@Jennanjack) January 23, 2013
Unbelievable.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member