Hysterical Hillary: ‘What difference does it make’ why 4 Americans are dead?

As Twitchy reported, right on cue, Hillary Clinton turned on the waterworks this morning during her testimony on Benghazi. But when questioned by Sen. Ron Johnson on the motives behind the murders of four Americans, she lost control of her carefully crafted emotions. Forced into the spotlight, Hillary lashed out, yelling “At this point, what difference does it make?”

What difference, Madam Secretary? A damn big one.

Indeed.

It matters to us, Madam Secretary. You’re an absolute disgrace.

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    Headline: Secretary Clinton – “I had no idea what was going on in my Department!”

    • wetheliving

      I don’t know WHAT WE’RE YELLING ABOUT!!

      • TomJB

        Did you miss “Headline:” ? You know, like how newspapers print their headlines in bold print? CAPS simulate yelling.

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        “I love lamp”

        • TomJB

          hmm I missed that reference :)

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            whammy!

  • wetheliving

    It’s awesome when you see something that is going to be an ad one day.

    Also I can’t wait to see the Today show and other news outlets couch criticism as “Republican criticism” to make sure they cast this as a partisan witch hunt and ignore the massive coverup this whole thing is.

    • http://twitter.com/equaltreatment Elaine

      Now let the attacks on those who dared to question her begin….

      • David

        Yes, the so-called media has a job to do all they can to help Obama and his merry band of incompetents.

        • http://www.facebook.com/richard.diggins.98 Richard Diggins

          As a Canadian, help me understand: If Obama’s band is so incompetent, how did they win his re-election given the incumbent never wins with such a high U.S. unemployment number. Could it be your Republicans are the incompetents?

          • BeautifulAmerica

            Fraud. Complicit media. RINOs. LIVs.

          • Catchance

            Yes, perhaps “incompetent” isn’t the word we’re looking for. How about fraudulent, lying, arrogant, and corrupt? Yes, that’s closer.

          • http://www.facebook.com/aruna.kumari.378199 Aruna Kumari

            Yes … may be corrupt suits better
            wordpress development

          • stacy meros

            It’s a valid question. But fighting the free giveaway mentality and “it’s all about me” makes it tough when the options are Personal Responsibility to achieve or fail v sit back and collect…think I’m wrong? Check out this: http://www.eurthisnthat.com/2011/11/30/woman-with-15-children-arrested-evicted-and-blames-state-for-her-problems-video/

          • lainer51

            can you say ” low information voters” aka – stupid

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            have you watched MSNBC?!!! I wouldn’t vote for a guy who I thought would give my family cancer.

          • showmesplfd

            Boy, are you gullible! As P.T.Barnum said, ‘There’s a sucker born every minute’ and you are living proof.

          • Snarky D

            An incredibly weak Republican field who took turns tearing Romney to pieces in the Republican primary lead to Obama’s victory. Voter turnout was way down and Romney had too many missteps. I don’t think it’s unfair to say the Republicans did nearly everything wrong in the 2012 election, including Romney himself for being too soft on Obama.

          • MKHouston

            It’s called . . . Chicago style politics

          • David

            It’s simple and my post is self explanatory. Statistics show that the so-called major news media had far more stories favorable to Obama and democrats than for Romney and the Republicans. It is difficult to get the message out when ABC, NBC, CBS, NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC etc. have decided they will do all that is necessary to assure that Obama and his incompetent band are re-elected.

          • GaryTheBrave

            Let’s not also forget that Obama/Biden were given more time in every debate. I hope the next GOP candidate just passes on the debates.

          • leftwingthom

            That is the most third-grade excuse I’ve ever heard. I watched all the debates, they got just as much time, in the VP debate i actually though Ryan got more time, i was waiting for him to shut up. And also, given the voters in this country, talking more would only hurt the candidates chances anyway, since most of us aren’t smart enough to understand what they’re saying.

          • GaryTheBrave

            Tom, you have just enter the teaching moment ™ zone. “… third-grade excuse …” is your way of dismissing my argument as being childish without calling me a child. However, it is true that in every debate there was more clock time given to the democrat candidates in each debate. (I purposefully did not capitalize democrat just like I purposefully didn’t include the H in your name. If you’re going to disrespect me, I shall disrespect you.)

            I listened to the debates on the radio. In the VP debate the sound was louder with Biden and the moderator (forgot the name. What does it matter anyway.). Ryan’s microphone definitely did not have the gain of Biden’s. Biden did get almost 90 more seconds than Ryan. The moderator kept interrupting Ryan and Biden’s cackling almost drowned out Ryan at some points.

            Your argument that talking more “hurts” the candidates “… since most of US aren’t smart enough …” You should not include anyone else in your arguments ™. You cannot speak for me nor anyone else here, including those who agree with you. If you are not smart enough to understand then I am sorry for you. I understood them perfectly.

            I wonder if anyone has added up the time advantage that O&B had in the debates,and whether that includes the time that the moderators interrupted R&R.

          • michael s

            Don’t you know their loser candidate was a victim of voter fraud? Even though not a single bit of evidence was taken to court,or the Congress, Senate.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

            Just like Bush “stole” the election of 2000? How quickly liberals forget…

          • BeautifulAmerica

            Donate to Judicial Watch if you don’t want this fraud happening again. I think they are the only ones doing something about it. They’re terrific!

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

            As a Canadian, are you aware of the terms ad hominem and non sequitur? Shouldn’t you limit your comments to the subject at hand, which is Hillary Clinton?

          • VerminMcCann

            So you’re arguing that winning an election invariably indicates competence? Well, that’s just stupid.

          • Ronald

            Competence at winning elections, but not necessarily competence at running the country, right?

          • Ronald

            Competence at winning elections, but not necessarily competence at running the country, right?

          • AmandaJeff Day

            How did Hitler get elected? He WAS elected, you know. He didn’t just amass a bunch of mercenary forces and take over the country. He was a great speaker, a charismatic personality who knew how to get people chanting, and he promised the people free stuff. Seeing a common thread here???

          • leftwingthom

            I should clarify something there, HE wasn’t elected, his PARTY was, and then he used his charisma and public speaking skills to gain his PARTY’s nomination. The people really had little say in it, and most likely didn’t know what they were getting themselves into. Also, don’t you think comparing Obama to Hitler has gotten a little bit old?

          • APW

            I don’t think so–I think every day it becomes more clear that Mr. Obama has designs for the country that could result in a civil war. I am not an alarmist, but I get the chills from him.

          • Ronald

            Hitler was never elected in the sense of winning a majority. He ran in two national elections in 1932. In the first, he got 30 percent of the vote, and no one got a majority. In the resulting runoff election, he increased his votes to 37 percent, while his opponent, World War I hero Field Marshall Hindenburg, got a majority. And since the Nazi party won 230 seats out of 608 in the Reichstag, it did not have the majority to make Hitler Chancellor. Then came the subterfuge and intimidation, etc. The rest is history.

          • Ronald

            Hitler was never elected in the sense of winning a majority. He ran in two national elections in 1932. In the first, he got 30 percent of the vote, and no one got a majority. In the resulting runoff election, he increased his votes to 37 percent, while his opponent, World War I hero Field Marshall Hindenburg, got a majority. And since the Nazi party won 230 seats out of 608 in the Reichstag, it did not have the majority to make Hitler Chancellor. Then came the subterfuge and intimidation, etc. The rest is history.

          • Elaine

            Try this… Obama GIVES them goodies so will they vote to give up the FREE stuff? NO. There are more takers than givers right now.

          • Ronald

            How do I get on that list of people that get goodies? 😉

          • showmesplfd

            Ronald, you are part of the problem, not part of the solution. Too many parasites result in a dead or dying host.

          • Ronald

            The winking — denoted by a semicolon and a round bracket –indicates sarcasm or a joke. Are you new to the internet?

          • Ronald

            How do I get on that list of people that get goodies? 😉

          • leftwingthom

            Well, i think it wasn’t so much that people were still gaga over Obama that it was about people hating the GOP. Obama’s approval ratings were at around 50%, guess where Republican-controlled Congress’ ratings were: 10%! Republicans have shown time and again that they don’t care about anyone in this country except for their rich oil buddies. And most Americans finally woke up to that fact this last election.

          • 97E

            Republicans haven’t controlled Congress since 2006.

            They lost control of both houses in 06, only to regain the House in 2010’s election. The Democrats still control the Senate, and don’t do much of anything there.

            Try pulling your head out of your ass before commenting again.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            rich oil buddies. you need new material dude. let me know how much money Obama got from oil companies.

          • shimauma

            I don’t know if you’ve noticed the scores lately that come out of public schooling, but lefturds now days are really stupid, and can be distracted with free stuff to vote the way they are told. Sadly our country has over 50% of them now.

          • captaingrumpy

            I say it was rigged from the start , at the company of Soros in Spain.

          • captaingrumpy

            I say it was rigged from the start , at the company of Soros in Spain.

          • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

            As a Canadian, help me understand…
            .
            I’ll help you understand: Mind your fucking business.

          • Frank_Lee

            I’m not sure that contributed much to his understanding, but it did a lot to show everyone that you’re a rude asshole.

          • Frank_Lee

            I don’t think you contributed much to his understanding, unless you were trying to help him understand that you’re a rude a$$hole.

          • BeautifulAmerica

            Get yourself over to the Canadian Free Press to update your education.

          • APW

            Richard, could you be any more disingenuous?

          • http://www.facebook.com/sandy.balboa.90 Sandy Balboa

            As a Canadian you don’t have enough brain cells to understand that the election was RIGGED? Always has been always will be. Do you think the powers that be can allow the will of the American people to mess up their plans every 4 years? Do you really think our vote matters when the voting machines and votes were not even tallied in America? Come on….Republicans/Democrats…..Coke/Pepsi Shell/Arco Safeway/Luckys Chevy/Ford get it….SAME THING!!!

    • BlueGood

      I’m surprised Hillary did not say as so many Leftoids are want to obnoxiously…..

      “At the end of the day…what does it matter”?

      “at the end of the day, Who cares if we all lied”?

      “at the end of the day…Who needs a steenking Founding Constitution”?..

      NEWSFLASH…most people, “at the end of the day” SLEEP, because they are dead tired from working their a$$es off to pay LEFTOID TAXES!

      Nail the sick lying Witch!

      • shimauma

        Well. that’s a nice dream, but sadly, hellary won’t be nailed; she’ll be lifted up and praised, a nice little blurb on the resume for her future gub’mint position.

    • LightSabre

      Yes, it probably will be in a republican ad in 4 years when Hillary runs for president. And, like we just saw with similar ads aimed at Obama by Romney’s campaign, it won’t make one bit of difference; she’ll be elected. Excuse me while I go cry and remember what a great country this used to be.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/JDFWJK7W5METRYKG4V5IWPAUEE John

      witch hunt? no , there was no *hunt*

      • lainer51

        no need to hunt…. its right there in front of the world to see.

      • wetheliving

        Ya very disappointing…

    • Snarky D

      The Republicans need to start airing this ad NOW. Not in two or three years. If Hillary is going to face a remotely challenging primary she will need to be seen as vulnerable by other Democrats seeking the Presidency. Biden will either not run or try to put her on the ticket with him. The Republicans need to learn the lesson of eviscerating each other in the primary and let the Dems have a taste of that too, otherwise Hillary will likely win in 2016 if she decides to run. Start taking her out of play now.

      • leftwingthom

        I’d actually back you on that, I don’t want Hillary in office, nor do a lot of other liberals i know. She’s a straight Blue Dog, as well as her husband. Now if Biden ran, he’d be my guy. Joe’s my hero, the way he took care of Paul Ryan in that VP debate? Classic.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          you mean the guy who also voted for the Iraq war. Biden will be, like, 98 years old in ’16. he will make McCain look like Justin Beiber by comparison.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          I seem to recall at that debate ‘ol Joe chuckling like a serial killer when Ryan brought up the deaths in Benghazi.

        • APW

          I would LOVE to see Joe Biden run. But I fear he is showing signs of early dementia–can’t seem to make his words come out right–even though he swears he always means what he says. heh heh heh. Oh, and there is that one other problem. Like Ted Kennedy, he is a famous ‘Catholic’ who promotes the murder of 3,500 babies every day. A sellout who has sold his soul for political advancement.

          • Woody Herman

            Could be dementia……I personally think he starts his day with 2 Xanax, Valium and a few glasses of scotch just to get right with the world. from there he moves to the hard stuff.

        • Snarky D

          I don’t think Joe is really any further to the left than Hillary, but is a far less skilled political animal than she is. Think back to the 2008 primary. Hillary won the popular vote, Obama was pushed to victory by the superdelegates. Joe, having only gotten about 1% of the vote, was selected as Obama’s running mate. There was no big push to get Biden on the ticket from anywhere but he was a safe choice for Obama. The Republicans for two elections now have run incredibly weak candidates against an incredibly charismatic opponent. Democrats did not ride to victory on Joe Biden’s shoulders, they dragged him along with them. Joe’s an affable guy but I’d never vote for him. If you think Biden can win, more power to you, but the Republicans will have to present the same weak cast of characters they’ve been putting forward (though I suppose they’re on track to do so now unless something changes).

  • Jack Deth

    Either Hillary is cutting her own political throat live on television. Or the Obama and Hillary Spin Teams are going to up very late tonight burning the midnight oil. For a full on blitz after prime time and tomorrow morning.

  • grais

    Yeah, let’s stop all this “handwringing” over the causes of the murders of 4 Americans.
    Somehow we’ll figure out how to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
    ??

  • rivers

    Listening to Hilary revet to her default stance of indignation…ah
    yes, takes me back to the ’90’s.

    • grais

      She doesn’t even try to hide her disdain and contempt for anyone (R) who doesn’t kiss her hairy butt and asks her tough questions.
      “We Are The President!”

    • $36544368

      Oh yeah…remember when she thought the ‘right-wing’ was trying to smear her husband with the whole Monica Lewinski ‘thing’, and even said it was a conspiracy? Ah…yes…but did she ever correct herself? Nope…she’s like a lot of liberal posters here…spew crap out of various bodily orifices before they know AND understand all the facts.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      90’s?! maybe Hillary could blame the band “Chumbawumbah”.

  • TocksNedlog

    Perhaps she became confused and thought she was being grilled over her husband’s extracurricular activities.

  • average schmoe

    Not to worry. The Main Stream Media is already behind the scenes planning her defense for the network news and morning shows. When it is all over the template will be “Poor Hillary, bullied by GOP in partisan attack” Then onto bashing GOP over debt ceiling and Gun Control.

  • Guest

    After the last 4 years I honestly thought America could not get any worse. I was wrong, with Hillary being, well being Hillary and Charlie Rangle declaring war on the southern culture yesterday America is officially a third world nation. Charlie Rangle has officially reached Somali Warlord status.

    • rinodino

      Then get out of our “3rd world” nation, got to be better nations that the USA right? So BYE-BYE

      • Elaine

        They all came HERE, that’s our problem..

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        dave, even you’ll admit to yourself when no one is around, if not for us neanderthals, you’d never survive the welfare leeches swarming the cities and countrysides to steal and destroy whatever the producers left behind before leaving.

        • leftwingthom

          You know, that attitude is exactly what lost you guys the election. I’ve even heard Republicans admit it. I said it earlier in the thread, it’s not that we were all still in love with Obama, it’s that we were fed up with you people’s blatant disrespect for the American people. If you insult the working class and dismiss them as “welfare leeches” and create barriers toward their achievement, do you think they’re going to support you?

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            So you gave your vote to a guy who is not only NOT concerned that the federal treasury is going over a waterfall, but he is going to drive the boat toward it at full speed. And you did it not because you believe in what he’s doing, but to teach “us people” a lesson because you or someone else’s feeling got hurt about something or other.

            Well I’m not sure if that’s suicidal, infantile or stupid. But you sure made a point and there may be no coming back because our President does nothing to dissuade me that he HATES people who are productive and pay taxes. You are going to get the government that you voted for a you deserve it. Working Americans don’t, but we are getting it shoved up our arses.

            But thank goodness the heroin dealers who have EBT cards won’t have their feelings hurt.

      • TomJB

        Nice to see the trolls being honest about not caring that the federal government is breaking the contract it made with each state when they joined the union.

      • JINNASH

        Your the one’s making it third world. Your the ones who need to stop pushing the drug known as govt. dependency. And your the ones who can’t handle real responsibility.

        • http://www.facebook.com/richard.diggins.98 Richard Diggins

          I think you mean “you’re”. I’m helping with your grammar because it makes you look third world illiterate.

          • Catchance

            Well, you’re right about the spelling, but dead wrong about everything else. Most of us overlook grammar and spelling mistakes, because we’re more interested in the content. You have no answer to the facts about government dependency, so you resort to ad hominem attacks.

          • JINNASH

            You found me out. I guilty of typing too fast and not proof reading for gammar. Oh and not too concerned either. Gammar has its uses but is only the on surface.
            Third world is Obama’s goal for this country. Do you share that objective?

          • sixbravothree

            Actually,grammar is very important. You kids today think it’s only for writing formal letters and composing sonnets,but languages have in effect died out because people forgot how to use them. Our language is the vehicle by which we transmit our culture to our children and to those who join our culture through immigration. If you let our language fall by the wayside it is likely that children will be reading about the lost tribe “The Americans” in their history books some day,right before their course on “The Aztecs” and Egyptian hieroglyphics.

            Grammar is important, but Dick up there is wrong that third-worlders are illiterate,they read,it’s just in a combination of illustrations like you find in a children’s book and whatever their native language is.

            Kids, don’t let that happen to your country. Pick up a book from time to time. Read the classics. You’ll be glad you did.

          • VerminMcCann

            Good catch douche bag. By the way, you ended a question with a period in your post above, and if you’re going to use “third world illiterate” as an adjective you might consider a hyphen or two.

      • $36544368

        LOL…Dude, seriously? You obviously don’t have a problem with people in government having no integrity…oh…wait…that’s right…you don’t either, so you wouldn’t have problems with Hillary lying.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/DL4AEVMNNXTS7A2EHW6B5KOHSY REO

        You be sure to escort him davy

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        actually, I think there were 12 nations with more economic prosperity than the US.

      • shimauma

        Libturd, you couldn’t get by without conservatives. Remember, WE are the ones that work and pay taxes. Without us your whole libturd nation would be slaves to the gub’mint, living in 400 sq ft apartments close to the factory the way they treat their people in China.

    • David

      The worst is yet to come . . . Obama Unchained . . . The Movie . . .

    • beebop1952

      If it DIDNT MATTER then why the hell did it take FOUR FREAKING MONTHS to come up with this BS?

    • leftwingthom

      No one’s making you stay, you know.

  • Joe W.

    “Oh, come on now, give her a break. She was simply taken out of context.”—This will be the administrations response…..Take it to the bank…

    • $36544368

      “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is”…

  • Joseph Phillips

    Whenever someone says “To be honest…” or “Honestly…” to me, that’s a sure-sign of here comes another whopper.

    • Elaine

      I had questions and I don’t think I got my answers? Where are the survivors and who questioned them, who initially told you all to use the fake video excuse and who gave the order to stand down? Anyone? I stopped watching because yelling the questions at my TV wasn’t working. lol

      • C J

        It was a big Flaw… as Obama and Hillary watch the Terrorist Attach on the live video feeds. Knowing before hand that this was going to happen. But they didn’t expect 2 hero’s to save people !! There were suppose to be no survivors. http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/chaffetz-state-department-hiding-benghazi-survivors/

        • Frank_Lee

          Another female lunatic. Don’t you have some dishes to wash?

    • V the K

      Hillary has been in a sham marriage for decades; the lying and denial come naturally now.

    • TexSizzle

      Or, if they actually are honest at that point, an admission that they haven’t been previously.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      bill Clinton likes whoppers.

    • shimauma

      Right on target. Whenever I hear that phrase I can’t help but wonder “so were you lying to me up to this point?”

  • Joe W.

    Jeepers, folks….She just “mis-spoke”….She had a blood clot on her brain, doncha know??? — More lib excusing of Shillary…..

  • walterc

    If it’s this much fun the Dem controlled Senate, I can’t wait for congressman Chaffetz to get a turn at asking the questions. Gonna be brutal.

  • Lord Foggybottom

    After 9/11, I remember all the libs crying about how, instead of going to war, we had to understand why the terrorists attacked us. Now they don’t care?

    • rinodino

      WRONG, we were ok with going to war in Afghanistan , not Iraq because our president at the time had daddy issues, that’s when we got pissed off… you know BEING LIED to by the administration in office?

      • Michael Anderson (WB)

        We did NOT go to war with Iraq after 9/11. We had been at war with Iraq since GHB. There was no surrender after the “first” Gulf War, only a ceasefire. The coalition forces agreed to a ceasefire provided Saddam held to some agreed upon conditions.

        The first time Iraqi planes entered the no fly zone that contract was void and had Clinton been doing his job we would have picked up where we left off, or at least after the 10th or 100th time.

        There was no need for GWB to find a legal reason to invade Iraq, he had it. To bring up WMDs as an excuse was foolish. You could say that it was wise to have a moral reason in addition to a legal reason, and there were many. Once again WMDs were only needed as a scare tactic.

        • rinodino

          No it IT’S NOT, and you are right we did not go to war with IRAQ after 9/11, but leave it to the BUSH administration to try to tie “Terriorism” of Bin Laden in with Saddam, and most americans bought that gullible BS…… It’s called having an axe to grind, because Saddam put out a hit on DADDY..
          I mean hello???????????? Bin Laden is up in the mountains of Afghanistan, not FREAKIN IRAQ!!!!! I knew from the beginning the WMD’s was major BS, our war with terriorism should have been SOLEY focused on Bin Laden and his crew, not the BS we were sold about Saddam and his family, who only cared about HIMSELF AND MONEY in his own country, and could give a damn about the Terrorism of Bin Laden. But most americans brought that crap the bush administration was talking and thousands of lives were lost!!!
          So all the sudden conservatives is all upset and up and arms about 4 american lives!!!??? Instead of thousands of young boys dying for DADDY ISSUES!!????….. So, Hilary has a point, what difference does it make?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            man, you must work in a pretzel factory, because you are tying yourself in knots.

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            Obama doesn’t have a Daddy. He was a no good lout and a Communist.

          • $36544368

            My Dear Phil…change “He was a no good lout…” to “He IS a no good lout” and I will be very happy 😉

          • WisconsinPatriot

            If Phil knows something……….I would be OK with past tense. I may begin referring to POTUS in the past tense, just for fun.

          • $36544368

            LOL…yeah, one can dream, I guess…I’m okay with past tense for the reasons you sited…but since my dream is more like a nightmare, I guess I was thinking more present tense 😉 My apologies to Phil.

          • djshawman

            Dave, you are arguing a point that is irrelevant. The article is about Hillary not Bush. Try to follow here. Hillary (not Bush) blamed this all on a video she knew not to be the case, and it DOES make a difference. So, you can try to win the argument based on fallacy, but I’ll just keep bringing it right back to the point.

          • $36544368

            Good luck with that…when a liberal can’t put two sentences together to make a valid point, they always blame Bush…poor man’s been out of office 4 years and he’s getting yelled at for the garbage not being taken out at the White House…geesh!

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            tell that to the Kurds, or better yet, Israel. Hussein was a threat to the middle east and you know it. Fucking loon.

          • Silenttype78

            You aren’t a student of history are you?
            You do seem to be pretty good at repeating all the left wing talking points.

            I would suggest that you do some research,or I would even go so far as to do your homework for you,but the truth is that people like you are probably too far gone to be helped.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            “terriorism”?!? use spellcheck dude. so, bush wanted to go to war against medium sized companion dogs?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            you ARE a jackass, WHO likes TO use capitalization AT random to disguise THE fact that you ARE a moron.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            THIS IS SMARTASSS!! my 300 imitation.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

          Were thousand of Kurds killed by scare tactics alone?

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        Two things about Iraq:

        1. We were operating under a Cease Fire from the Gulf War. Remember the Northern and Southern No-Fly Zones? The Iraqis violated them almost daily by shooting at our aircraft. We didn’t even need further “authorization” to go into Iraq, although President Bush did it….TWICE, before invading in 03.

        2. Forget the title “Al Qaeda.” We are at war with Islamists, Muslims who want to militarily establish Sharia Law in as many countries as possible, but specifically the middle east. Our goal, even though no one in DC will say it publicly, is to kill as many of these pieces of walking excrement as possible.

        Afghanistan is a landlocked country with a LOT of extremely high elevations. It is a logistical nightmare, especially when we have to bribe Pakistan to let us bring in heavy equipment.

        Iraq has a port facility (for us anyway) in Kuwait through which we can easily bring in tanks and other heavy gear. It’s terrain is relatively flat. Once there, it became a jihadi magnet and we were able to kill thousands more Islamists than in Afghanistan. I don’t know about you, but if my brothers and sisters are in harms way, I want them to be able to kill way more of the bad guys than they can of us.

        Now, if you want to talk about “daddy issues” let’s talk about Barry Soetoro who had none in his life and had to make him up in his head.

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        you mean, the policy for regime change in Iraq that was upheld by the current SOS’s husband? you fucking sicken us.

        • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

          And it got a Yes vote from the incoming Sec of State.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            i hear he served in the military in some country called “Vietnam”? i’ll have to wikipedia that to see if it’s true.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            i guess my last remark offended somebody, what with the down vote and all. dave travis, are you downvoting all these comments?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            and a yes from the soon to be Defense Secretary. I would’ve thought that Obama could’ve found plenty of competent and qualified people who didn’t vote for the war that Obama called “dumb”.

      • Cold War Grunt

        As opposed to the daily lies coming out of the current administration …
        And “the lies” Bush told us were lies most western intelligence agencies at the time were telling their respectives. You need to get some perspective.
        POTUS Obama has been lying for 5 years to the American People, where is your indignation over that?

      • Vennoye

        Got mad because you thought you were lied to then, but now you are totally fine with the lies of the current administration……….. Perhaps it is not lies that bother you, just who you think is telling them!!

      • rivers

        Dude, if you actually think Bush had Daddy issues, you must be really worried about the current POTUS and his issues with his [drunk-cheating-abandoning-polygamist-colonialist-with-daddy-issues-of-his-own] daddy.

      • Dwayne Jackson

        Do you really have the AUDACITY to accuse Bush of lying?

      • lainer51

        Billary was all for going to war, until she “wasn’t”

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        Daddy issues?!! I’d like to know what diploma mill you got your BS in psychology.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

        I suppose you weren’t alive back then (no one could be that ignorant) but did you forget that both Clintons, Kerry, the UN. multiple intelligence agencies, and the IAEA felt that Hussein should be deposed|?

      • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

        Daddy issues? Really? I’m SURE you have proof of this, right dingleberry?

      • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

        Daddy issues? Really? I’m SURE you have proof of this, right dingleberry?

  • catb55

    Hey Hillary .. who gave the order to STAND DOWN? Oh and where are the Benghazi survivors .. are they safe or have they been “silenced”. More questions now than ever … and glowing Hillary pronouncements by the Dems were DISGUSTING.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      now, Clinton thinks it could’ve been just some people out for a walk?!? maybe she can blame an article in “Runners’ World” magazine.

  • sleazyrider

    You really didn’t expect her to tell the truth…did you?

    • $36544368

      Expect? Nope. Hope she would? Yup. What I did realize is that she has blurred the line between truth and lies for so long, she doesn’t know the difference…another yahoo in government who falls along the lines of the story of “The Emperor’s New Clothes”.

    • beebop1952

      I didn’t expect her disdain for truth to be so obvious. What a fraud she is.
      She’s a used up, unhealthy, whiney politician who never had any “lady smarts” to begin with. She thinks we OWE HER SOMETHING for Bill Clinton making a FOOL OF HER their entire marriage. Here’s what I have for her: contempt.

  • Silenttype78

    It kinda makes a lot of difference….
    Which is exactly why she and the rest of the Obama admin. rushed to blame it on anything other than a foreign policy failure.
    It was important to them to continue the “Al Qaeda is pretty much over with now that Bin Laden is dead”.
    It would have been devastating (if most American’s gave a damn anyway) to admit that Al Qaeda is anything but over.

    She doesn’t care that she totally threw the 1st Amendment under the bus to cover for this administrations incompetence and dishonesty.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marcy-Cook/1001619613 Marcy Cook

    WOW….that blood clot must be traveling today.

    • $36544368

      Could be a fat embolism.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      no, the blood clot travelled to Hawaii last month.

  • Kristy Patullo

    Oh, Hillary. I used to admire you so much. Agree with Twitchy. Absolutely disgraceful.

  • BeevaloBill

    She doth protest too much, “what difference does it make” followed by we need to find who did it and what happened. Sec. Clinton’s response was so convoluted that it was nonsensical. I get it, your emotional; I get it, the emotion is designed disguise the State Department’s and Executive’s misfeasance (at best) or malfeasance (at worst).

    By asking relevant, on point questions, Ron Johnson shows he is a serious man for serious times. Unfortunately, he serves in body filled with un-serious gasbags and microcephalics

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      September 12: “it was the YouTube video”
      January 23: “we don’t know why, but it isn’t important”
      So, months of investigation yielded less info about the attacks than it did right afterwards. We now know less about the attacks than before. who was the investigator, Was it Inspector Clousseau?

  • rinodino

    The outrage from the Right is amazing, but it still doesn’t matter, If Madam Secretary runs for president in 4 years, she will be our president, GET READY with your outrage righties, amazing how you guys were not outraged at WMDs, but what difference does it make? Right?

    • Chip

      Spoken like a true mushroom!!! Stay in the dark and eat up all the BS the left provides.

    • NCRelite

      I know it is amazing that the right would dare to question the ruling class. 4 dead americans, terrorists dominating the middle east, an innocent man wrongly imprisoned – what difference does it make?

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      what you said in no way defends the administration’s failure to respond to requests to enhance security. And given that al Qaeda was a known presence in north Africa and that the 9/11 anniversary was coming up, and they were still blindsided by this attack?! We don’t need that type of incompetence in 2016.

    • http://twitter.com/1RandiStarr Randi Starr

      Ahhh, it might matter to those that care about the 4 who were killed and those who loved and cared about them. Which gives light as to what type of person you are.Sad.

    • Kevin Krom

      Another point in favor of my thesis posted elsewhere on this article — out resident troll here couldn’t give a damn about the truth of the matter, it’s all about winning.

    • djshawman

      Again. Not on point. Do you think it is OK for Clinton to lie? That is the question here. Republicans are not on trial this time. WMDs have nothing to do with this topic. Quit trying to win an argument with red herrings.

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        this guy is really reaching on this one. She voted yes on the Iraq war. Her husband (who was once president) would’ve known if Iraq didn’t have WMD because he was president in the 90’s during these sanctions. If there were no WMD’s, why didn’t Bubba tell her so?

        • $36544368

          Too busy lying about Monica? Maybe that’s why he didn’t tell her 😉

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            i doubt it. but maybe..

    • JINNASH

      So you like voting for unqualified people. At least you admit it. Or do you think she is qualified because you hope she’ll give you someone else’s money?

      • $36544368

        No, he wants Bill to be president again, through Hillary.

        • JINNASH

          Good point and its probably for the same reason.

    • $36544368

      I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’d like a sample of whatever it is that Dave Travis is on! I think the government must be putting it in the water at the White House.

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        you can buy it at shop.msnbc.com

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      we got a Weapon of Mass Delusion in the form of one Dave Travis.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      I don’t think anyone who managed to be duped by the president you regard as an idiot, is smart enough to lead this country.

    • lainer51

      GET READY!! Oh my, scary headless wonder you are.

    • Catchance

      Why don’t you ask Al Assad about the WMDs? He knows where they are.

      Moron.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      I got her campaign slogan ready. can you guess what it is?

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeBeq0i03bg Booker

    This woman is a disgrace. She took the fall before, and now she is defiant. How does it feel to be on the other side of the aisle?

  • NixTyranny

    “what difference does it make” was pretty much her reaction to Bill & Monica, too.

    • $36544368

      Ooohhh….snap! Really, you’re right…never thought about it that way before.

  • Kevin Krom

    “What difference does it make?”

    That’s the liberal/progressive movement in a nutshell. Objective truth is a foreign concept to them — only the current “operative truth” that helps advance their agenda matters, and it can be discarded as soon as it serves its purpose. It’s all about the accumulation of power, and moral and ethical concepts don’t fit into that.

  • tarandfeatherthecrooks

    “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive”…Sir Walter Scott

  • orringtonmom (D)

    funny, that is exactly her husband’s defense about lying re: monica.

    • orringtonmom (D)

      oh, and what difference does it make? the difference between cover-up and justice for our slain americans… i know lies, cover-up and murder are all business as usual for this lot, but for the rest of us it is anything BUT justice.

    • orringtonmom (D)

      i was also impressed when she said that yeah, they could have waited until they knew the truth but that just isn’t what america is about… wtf did that mean?

      • $36544368

        If I had a terminal illness, I’d want to know right away…don’t play with my emotions and pretend that I’m going to be okay…it’s the same thing…be honest and up front…say, ‘I don’t know, but I’m going to find out’…anything along that line…just stop lying to us and treating us like not-quite-bright children. I’m so tired of the condescending behavior from the government.

  • fivebyfive

    When you confront a LIAR about her LIES she cries, WHO CARES?
    WE THE PEOPLE DO

  • TEXANONLY

    She does not care, its not her life that was lost. Time to fight these people

    • http://resministries.org/ Arthur E Jackson

      Time to remove them from office and by force if necessary and as a last resort.

      • LightSabre

        Count me in.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    considering the fact that the 9/11 anniversary was upcoming and they were in north Africa, shouldn’t they have enhanced security there anyways?

  • Gallatin

    “What difference does it make?” Is this lying WITCH for real???? Ask again and again and again about her youtube video statements. Then drag obowmao’s butt into the hearing and have his lying butt say; “what difference does it make?” This better not go away, this better not get swept under a rug. Lying witch and I”m being too kind.

    • $36544368

      What scares me about this is that a lot of people in the US will actually believe that Hillary is being grilled ‘unnecessarily’…foolish, foolish people…God, I can hardly wait to say, “I told you so” when they start complaining even more over the next four years (I can hardly stand to type that!) at other things they weren’t expecting from this administration (taxes, debt, ‘handouts’, etc.).

  • $35072932

    It’s really nice to see the Oppressives showing how the selectively ‘Care’ about people.

    When they’re responsible for deaths as in Benghazi and Obama’s Guns for Gangsters the reaction is ‘What difference does it make!’

    When they can Use deaths to their advantage to deprive the people of their basic freedoms they can’t pretend to care enough about the issue.

    • David

      Excellent post.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      don’t forget the deaths in Afghanistan, still.

      • $35072932

        Yes, as soon as the Dear Liar took over the government, he and the BSM suddenly became disinterested in those deaths.

  • michael s

    Good you’re finally going after her considering the 4 months of minimal criticism. On the other hand the Lynch mob mentality for Pres Obama and UN ambassador Rice was very direct.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      i wasn’t aware that “lynching” means asking someone “who told you that you were gonna be doing the talk show circuit this weekend and here’s what you will say about the attacks”

    • Kyle Bradelle

      Dude, she works directly for 0bama. She does nothing as Secretary of State without his knowledge or oversight. She was doing HIS bidding. Hillary should certainly answer for her part in the Benghazi debacle, but she’s not the only one, not by a long shot.

      • $36544368

        I’d love to see BO sitting there, getting grilled like a cheese sandwich by the Senate.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          cheese sandwich?! what, so all black people like cheese sandwiches. sorry, I was pretending I was Dave Travis for a little bit.

          • $36544368

            I stole that line from Judge Marilyn Millian of “The People’s Court”…she’s Cuban…does that matter? Will I get into trouble for saying that? LOL!

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            i was joking. I was pretending to be Chris Matthews when i called “cheese sandwich” a racial code word. “cheese sandwich” is definitely not racist. “pimento sandwich” on the other hand is definitely racist.

    • Kevin Krom

      Ah, a subtle “race card” play. Sorry, not going for it — we’ve been demanding answers from Clinton from the beginning, but she has been dodging questions with overseas trips and a convenient “injury/malady/whatever” to continue to run out the clock.

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Just because YOU weren’t paying attention after this happened last year doesn’t mean that WE weren’t. We were criticizing EVERYONE in this lame-ass incompetent administration! Keep up, son!

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Just because YOU weren’t paying attention after this happened last year doesn’t mean that WE weren’t. We were criticizing EVERYONE in this lame-ass incompetent administration! Keep up, son!

  • NCRelite

    Between Biden’s condescending laughter at the VP debates and Hillary’s “what difference does it make?” comments I’ve come to the conclusion that the ruling class has absolutely no respect for We The People

    • BNVRANCHOS

      Rest assured…..when you hear, (as dumb-ass,racist Jamie Foxx referred to)..”Our Lord and Saviour” speak, in regard to “We The People”….. He is NOT speaking about us, but HIS GOVERNMENT!!!!

  • TomJB

    We need to lighten up on, Hillary. She is, after all, interviewing for 3 additional husbands.

  • stuckinIL4now

    What does it matter, Madam Secretary? Well if it doesn’t make a difference that 4 Americans are dead, then what difference do you make? What do we need your sorry butt for? Or those who work for you? Or, especially, those you work FOR. Don’t need the entire useless lazy lying cheating corrupt despicable treasonous blankin’ bleepin’ bunch of you America and American killers. So get lost. Retire. Get outta the biz–but you can’t bcuz you’re all a bunch of power junkies and you can’t let go of your massively sick narcissistic ego addictions and yes, you are all NOTHINGS.

  • David

    Obama and his incompetent band will tour the world’s golf courses looking for the Benghazi murderers; all the while helping OJ find the real killer.

  • ceemack

    Hakuna matata
    What a wonderful phrase

    It’s our problem-free foreign policy…

  • Jack Deth

    Geeeeeee….

    I seem to remember many, many Democrats screaming like banshees over four dead college students at Kent State.

    Oh, wait…. A Republican was President then.

    • lainer51

      spot on!

  • http://www.facebook.com/liberals.needhelp Liberals Needhelp

    It’s almost sad. I can’t even get mad.
    Our country, our ‘news’ media (aka talking heads w/DNC cards in their pockets), will present this statement has her ‘ah-ha’ moment.
    See, she took down the Senator who tried to take her down!
    No, she lied.
    No, she deflected.
    No, she took zero responsibility for the State Dept. role, her dept., in the brutal deaths of 4 Americans on her watch….and her lackluster, absentee response the hours afterwards.
    She held up that paper in 2001…..what did he know, when did he know it, Bush knew!
    Remember.
    It matters.
    It mattered then.
    It matters now.
    How arrogant. How sad, she may very well be President….and we just let her get away w/ murder – literally.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      she ain’t gonna be president. Deval Patrick’s the nominee for the dems.

    • BNVRANCHOS

      Absolutely disgusting….. too much ‘kissing up’ today…as many ‘thank-you’s ‘ as at the Oscar Awards….. and as far as “getting away with murder”…..bet it’s not the first time, nor the last…..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Wood/100000495900042 Rick Wood

    Lying to cover her incompetence and that of Obama’s administration.

    • http://resministries.org/ Arthur E Jackson

      Best part is we are paying to be lied too

  • $21367552

    The outrage of you and your ilk is duly noted. Anyone who actually bothers to
    read or watch would see that she was saying that regardless of why the Americans were killed, an investigation into what
    happened needs to be carried out.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      then Why the fuck has the administration not provided the documents to the media that they have ASKED FOR regarding benghazi ?!

    • $36544368

      Oh…okay…so the end justifies the means….yeah, whatever.

  • http://resministries.org/ Arthur E Jackson

    American’s should strap on a gun, meet in Washington for a peaceable demonstration, demanding, .all those that violated the Constitution either by their vote or proposed bills step down from office immediately. Howbeit, a Dem or a Rep. the Dems avoid the Constitution and the Rep’s stand there with one finger in their mouth and the other in the A hole, and then switch. What a joke. What difference does it make…Really, I am paying for this stuff?

  • http://resministries.org/ Arthur E Jackson

    What difference does it make??? Really

  • laura_PH

    The difference it makes is that based on the lie or misinformation about the protest, the government attacked free speech and pretended that jihadi acts of terror are justified because they were offended by American free speech. As our veep commented, that’s a big f’n deal.

  • C J

    Watch the video , see when she is making her statement about standing with obama when the flag draped coffins came off the plane…she had to read it from a script…anyone who really felt sorrow would not have to read from a script to tell how they felt !!! Fraud just like Obama !!

  • http://resministries.org/ Arthur E Jackson

    I didn’t have sex with that women, and now

  • $23629333

    Glad I’m not a donkey. Imagine having to choose between Baroness Munchausen and the Dope from Delaware.

  • $24376261

    241 American servicemen were murdered during the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing attack under Ronald Wilson Reagan’s watch.

    • mike_in_kosovo

      And you think this is applicable to the discussion, how?

      • Thevelvetkitten

        Duh,because O should get a pass because others got away with something.. It is only fair…so much for hope and change for better more honest govt.

        • mike_in_kosovo

          Duh, because O should get a pass…

          Evidently so!

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      I hear that right after the bombing, Reagan blamed Atari and then flew to Vegas for a fundraiser.

  • thetruthplease

    Thank you for the dagger in your presidential aspirations. You and Obama lied to the American people and your upset that you have to answer questions about your lies.

  • $24698634

    After 9-11-01, Condi testified she HAD read the memo (BinLaden determined to strike in the US) and still didn’t do anything, saying the memo wasn’t specific enough. Not only did she not get fired, no one did. Almost 2,000 dead. Some perspective, please.

    • Todd Hill

      Secretary of State Colin Powell should’ve been grilled just as mercilessly as Hillary Clinton is now. Whose job was it then to ensure the grilling took place? Additionally, who was the majority party in the house and the senate during those hearings?

      • Thevelvetkitten

        THANK you!!!

    • Matt

      Are you $!#!ing kidding me ? Your response to HIllary’s dodge of the truth is to go back to the Bush years? Its ok to you that Hillary won’t address the lies told by the administration. Does your side EVER address the #$!ing issue?? You’re a giant stinking pile of garbage.

      • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

        their next defense of Hillary will be a takedown of William Howard Taft. they’ll go that far back I’m certain.

    • mike_in_kosovo

      Speaking of perspective…you mean the memo that was *NOT* able to confirm that OBL was planning to hijack planes?

      • $24698634

        What do you need to act, proof positive, a confession?

        • mike_in_kosovo

          If you’re going to nail Bush on not acting on rumors of hijackings (and note that NOTHING is said about using the hijacked planes as suicide bombs), then you can’t turn around and say that he shouldn’t have believed the intel about WMDs (that the rest of world believed was valid at the time).

          Well, not unless you’re a complete hypocrite, that is.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          absolutely. he should’ve rounded up every Muslim male who had just taken flight lessons and held them without trial. I’m sure the democrats would’ve had no problem with that. moron.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          maybe if the hijackers had sent a YouTube video, we could’ve used that to convince the democrats to round up the Muslims.

    • HARP2

      Lame

    • Thevelvetkitten

      not gonna argue the truth of this or not…but one question for you to ponder….So basically, because in your opinion this supposedly happened on 9/11 that O and this administration should get a pass for everything everyone else got away with? The “BUT he did it defense” …smh .
      So,what they are doing is less of an evil because only 4 people died versus 2,000? So when it gets to 2001 people I should assume you will then be outraged enough to demand answers? Is that how you are justifying it? If it is you should be ashamed. I mean you were the ones that went around and sold everyone on how much more morally compassed and transparent than everyone else and the rest of that love peace and tolerance bs. Sorry,if we are a little confused by this sides silence and gasping at anyone that dares to question anyone.

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Becasue the memo didn’t state when or where the attacks would happen. You said it yourself, moron!

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Becasue the memo didn’t state when or where the attacks would happen. You said it yourself, moron!

  • http://www.jackiewellfonder.com/ Jackie Wellfonder

    I’m still flabbergasted…

  • Matt

    Watching these trolls try to reach into the past and reference Bush and Reagan to excuse this hideous hag’s behavior is disgusting.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/DL4AEVMNNXTS7A2EHW6B5KOHSY REO

    Liesl, all lies, tell me more lies. In two quick years it wont matter what these transformers believe. Obamo will be lame duck lyer in chief. and the country will have relized, maybe we should quit hiring lying lawyers to run things. Maybe it is time to give a successful business man an opportunity. The hole is getting deep however. Celebrate Senator Paul!

  • r_coplin2001

    Sean Hannity will have a field day on his show tonight and i will be eating popcorn if i had any while watching the show

  • salvagesalvage

    Wingnuts rip a quote right out of context and then repeat it to themselves as if they didn’t know!

    It’s stuff like this that makes them so much fun to watch.

    If only wingnuts cared as much about the thousands of dead Americans killed in Iraq looking for WMD that never were.

    • HARP2

      Hillary…Biden..and Kerry ALL said there were WMD. They also ALL voted to invade Iraq.
      Best you research before proving to the world your ignorance.

      • salvagesalvage

        Ha! Ha! Yes! It’s the fault of the people who believed the lies that are to blame!

        Wingnuts, this is how the handle reality.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          umm, I guess hillary’s husband could’ve told her that wmd’s didn’t exist, so she could’ve voted “no”. Ha Ha!

          • lainer51

            don’t pick on Bubba, he was “busy” under the desk smoking cigars.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            amazing, for all the democrats that say they oppose the war, Obama sure has a lot of them in his cabinet. opposing the war should mean you actually voted no, not being against it when the election is coming up.

        • Guest

          One question…why do you not hold her and this administration to the same accountibilty you expect of everyone else ? I thought they were so much better. If they were then this country wouldn’t be so damn divided and everyone would be happy and partying like it was 1999. All you offer is hot air and excuse after excuse after excuse…

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            I think salvage salvage regards “party like it’s 1999” as a racist statement. yknow, because Prince was black.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            salvage thinks calling somebody “wing nut” wins the argument.He’s not even an original idiot.

          • lainer51

            and he says it over and over and over and over; obviously his limited vocabulary matches his tiny IQ.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            I was gonna say tiny di. ….er, um…..elbows?

          • TexSizzle

            Room-temperature IQ (Celsius).

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          wow, according to libs, the man they regarded as the dumbest man to be president managed to dupe members of senate (including many long serving Senators) into voting for the war. why didn’t her hubby tell her that the wmd’s didn’t exist?

          • salvagesalvage

            Yeah, it actually doesn’t take a smart man to lie, in fact it’s what stupid people often do.

            At any rate anyone who questioned the WMD existence was shouted down as being unpatriotic Saddam lovers.

            It’s cute the way wingnuts forget about that sort of thing.

          • lainer51

            seriously? The water carriers for Barry insist he is the smartest man on earth; if that’s the case, smart men lie constantly.

          • salvagesalvage

            Who says that? It’s funny wingnuts are the only ones who ascribe hyperbolic credentials to Obama and then complain about it.

          • lainer51

            listen to your liberal TV stations… i.e. MSNBC, CNN – they practically pee their pants when talking about the intelligence of the Barester…. of course who would really know the truth? His college records are “sealed”..

          • salvagesalvage

            Well I don’t watch any of those things so I’ll have to take your word for it but it could be that when someone isn’t calling Obama a secret Muslim communist Soviet who hates America you probably think that they’re praising him.

          • salvagesalvage

            Well I don’t watch any of those things so I’ll have to take your word for it but it could be that when someone isn’t calling Obama a secret Muslim communist Soviet who hates America you probably think that they’re praising him.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            wow, so Hillary voted for the war (even though her husband had known there were no wmd’s) because she was afraid of being criticized for being unpatriotic. what about the Senators who voted no? you’re supporting a senator who voted to send troops to war, because she didn’t want anyone to call her “unpatriotic”?!? how brave of her. I’ve changed my mind. Hillary in’16 baby!!!

          • salvagesalvage

            You’re right, the Democrats who voted for the war were cowards but they didn’t actually invade or screw it all up.

            That’s the important bit that wingnuts ignore.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            so, I’m guessing you aren’t a Hillary supporter?

          • salvagesalvage

            Not really.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            well, you got that going for you, which is something..i guess.

          • RightThinking1

            salvage,

            You might note the dates of the unequivocal statements issued by Clinton, his Cabinet members, et al. Were they reacting to ‘lies’ made by the Bush administration? That would be odd since Bush would not take office for two years. That being the case, are not *they* the source of the ‘lies’? This is as straightforward a question as can be asked.

            Of course it is possible that they were not lying at all, but rather were relying on the best intelligence available. I acknowledge that Carter had crippled the CIA, and Clinton didn’t help it either, so resources were not what they might be, but Bush relied upon the lingering (and manifestly lame) CIA that Clinton had managed for eight years.

            Bush’s mistake was believing Clinton CIA appointee George Tenet (who emphatically and absolutely reported that WMD’s were present), and for that matter, all of those quoted above. To say that ‘Bush lied’ is pure political BS hyperbole. I understand that it is self-satisfying for Democrats to say such things, but when they do, they merely diminish their own character. I concede that to be a matter of little personal import to them.

          • salvagesalvage

            There was no real evidence of WMD in Irag, there was much cherry picking and ignore of facts however.

            Bush said there was tons of anthrax, a reconstituted nuclear program and a way for Saddam to blow up London in 45 minutes, a mobile bio weapons lab and arms ladened drones.

            There was no intelligence that suggested those things and there was nothing like that in Iraq and thousands of Americans are dead as a result.

            That’s the reality wingnut, deny it all you like the facts remain.

          • RightThinking1

            “There was no real evidence of WMD in Irag, there was much cherry picking and ignore of facts however.”
            So…, Clinton and his cabinet were ‘lying’, no?”

            “Bush said there was tons of anthrax, etc…”
            Are you saying that information was *not* provided by Tenet?

            “There was no intelligence that suggested those things..”
            Again, are you saying that Tenet did not empahaticaly state those things were true?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            well, i guess she wasn’t intellectually curious enough to ask a few questions first. perhaps she should’ve asked her hubby (former president) if he knew there were any WMD’s in Iraq.

        • Catchance

          You dare to laugh over a terrible tragedy caused by an arrogant and corrupt administration.

          • salvagesalvage

            Ha! Ha! Yes! I am laughing at the terrible tragedy that was totally Obama’s fault! Him being a secret Muslim who hates America and all.

    • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

      And libtards severely downplay every disgusting, evil, damning statement made by their secular messiahs.

      By the way, we did find WMDs: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

      • salvagesalvage

        Ha! ha! Yes! Down playing is just like taking someone’s statement and making it look like they said something else.

        By the way, you should tell President Bush that because he seems to think that you didn’t find any WMD:

        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-11680239

        Oh by the way the Wired article does not descibe anywhere near the threat that the Bush Administration screamed about in the run up to the war that has killed how many Americans again? More or less than Benghazi?

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          maybe he saw the wmd’s in a YouTube video.

        • Catchance

          Are you still going on about Bush? This thread is about Benghazi, which the administration has been covering up for 4 months. They knew the embassy was not safe, they watched in real time while the ambassador was raped and killed, then lied and lied and lied. They watched in real time while the ex SEALs gave their own lives after being told to stand down, and then they lied and lied and lied some more. This administration is the most corrupt and fraudulent and disgusting administration imaginable, and here you are defending these pieces of excrement. You’re just as disgusting as they.

          • salvagesalvage

            Ha! Ha! Yes! They knew the embassy was going to be attacked and they were all “Good! Hope they all die!”.

            Then they saw the SEALs were going to fight back and ordered them to unload their weapons and be raped!

            Wingnuts, no matter how stupid they are they find a way to be stupider.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            that “wing nut” schtick is extremely fresh and innovative. you should keep using it. it makes you look debonair.

        • TexSizzle

          The fatalities in the war in Afghanistan under President Bush were 630. So far under Mr. Obama, there have been 1546, well over twice as many. [Source: http://icasualties.org/oef/

          • salvagesalvage

            What policy did Obama initiate that caused in increase in casualties?

            Oh and no one objected to Afghanistan, again, different things are different!

          • CherDash

            He changed the RoE, tying the hands of the soldiers.

          • salvagesalvage

            Really? Can you show us some evidence of this?

          • TexSizzle

            I don’t know – maybe sending in more troops to a place that he said he would withdraw them all from. And as for no one objecting to Afghanistan: what short memories you leftists have. You (collectively, maybe not you personally) objected to it because President Bush sent troops there, but applauded when Mr. Obama sent more troops there. Bless your heart.

    • lainer51

      If only left loony liberal wingnuts cared as much about the millions of babies aborted that never were

      • salvagesalvage

        Yes, it makes sense to care about people that never existed.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          people that never existed: Santa, unborn fetuses, liberals with conscience.

    • Catchance

      Syria has them. Saddam shipped them to Al Assad as soon as he realized we were coming in.

      • salvagesalvage

        Ha! Ha! Yes! Saddam was under attack so he sent away his deadliest weapons! Makes perfect sense! And of course that would mean that Bush let WMD spread throughout the Middle East to America’s enemies. Mission accomplished!

        That’s the funniest thing about wingnuts, they try and excuse a screw up by making it seem an even bigger one!

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          hey “what difference does it make” (quoting our next president)

          • salvagesalvage

            Ha! Ha! She really said that in that exact context!

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            yep. and she really wanted to know “why” when they had a foolproof answer (youtube video) but apparently four months after the attack, “why” isn’t a very important question to be answered. Ha! Ha!

          • salvagesalvage

            Oh wingnut, the video. The attack happens around the same time as the video so a theory is presented that there could be a connection then it turns out probably not but wingnuts start shrieking “NUH-UH! YOU SAID VIDEO! CAN’T TAKE IT BACK! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!” as if somehow it matters.

            That by the way is pretty much the view of the entire planet, it’s only wingnuts that are so obsessed.

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            that might be why they are asking when did they find out that it wasn’t the video. only a numb nut like you wouldn’t want to know.

          • salvagesalvage

            Sometimes after? What does that matter? You have this conspiracy with no reason. If it was the tape it would be different rather than the usual local manoeuvre / expression of hatred for the West?

            See that’s what Clinton was getting irritated about, there is no scandal so wingnuts keep on acting as if there is one, like Obama got away with shifting the motive of the attack because…? What? He’s a secret Muslim and it’s part of his secret Muslim plan to make America Muslim by blaming anti-Muslim videos?

            She’s got a million things to do and she has to deal with wingnuts, that would frustrate anyone.

            Except me, I think you’re hysterical.

          • salvagesalvage

            Oh wingnut, the video. The attack happens around the same time as the video so a theory is presented that there could be a connection then it turns out probably not but wingnuts start shrieking “NUH-UH! YOU SAID VIDEO! CAN’T TAKE IT BACK! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!” as if somehow it matters.

            That by the way is pretty much the view of the entire planet, it’s only wingnuts that are so obsessed.

          • lainer51

            do you laugh like that in real life? — everything is HA HA – sounds like a freak is on the loose…

          • salvagesalvage

            No, I laugh like that when wingnuts say something really wingnutty.

          • salvagesalvage

            No, I laugh like that when wingnuts say something really wingnutty.

    • RightThinking1

      Having posted this once, I am hesitant to do so again. But…, salvage invites it, so:

      “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
      develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
      That is our bottom line.”

      –President
      Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

      “If Saddam
      rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want
      to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass
      destruction program.”

      –President
      Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

      “Iraq is a long
      way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For
      the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical
      or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security
      threat we face.”

      –Madeline
      Albright, Feb 18, 1998

      “He will use those
      weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”

      –Sandy
      Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

      “[W]e urge you,
      after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
      Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
      appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
      effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of
      mass destruction programs.”

      Letter to President
      Clinton, signed by:


      Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others,
      Oct. 9, 1998

      “Saddam Hussein
      has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
      technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made
      a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”

      -Rep.
      Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

      “Hussein has …
      chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
      palaces for his cronies.”


      Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

      “There is no
      doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs.
      Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
      continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition,
      Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using
      the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles
      that will threaten the United States and our allies.”

      Letter to President
      Bush, Signed by:


      Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

      “We begin with
      the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the
      peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the
      United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
      means of delivering them.”


      Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

      “We know that he has
      stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout
      his country.”


      Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

      “Iraq’s search
      for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we
      should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”


      Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

      “We have known for
      many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of
      mass destruction.”


      Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

      “The last UN
      weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
      Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological
      weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up
      his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports
      indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”


      Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

      “I will be
      voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use
      force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
      that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a
      real and grave threat to our security.”


      Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

      “There is
      unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to
      develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
      next five years … We also should remember we have always
      underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons
      of mass destruction.”


      Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

      “He has
      systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
      significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy
      his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he
      has refused to do”


      Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

      “In the four
      years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam
      Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
      stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
      also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al
      Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
      Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and
      chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”


      Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

      “We are in
      possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
      Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity
      for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”


      Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

      “Without
      question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
      dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly
      grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation
      … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued
      deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So
      the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real


      Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
      —————————————————————————————————

      Wait! Are those ‘Out of context’?

      • salvagesalvage

        Yeah, those people didn’t actually, y’know, invade? See sometimes politicians say stuff that isn’t true, part of their job.

        Bush lied and started and lost a war that wasn’t necessary.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          ah, so it was okay to over exaggerate the threat, but not okay to vote for the war?! wait a minute, that is exactly what they fucking did.

          • salvagesalvage

            No, it wasn’t okay but exaggerating a threat and actually sending people to die for the exaggerated threat are different things.

            Do you understand different?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            but she did send people off to die! she voted for it!

          • salvagesalvage

            She sure did and she should feel bad about that but not as bad as Bush and pals. Once again there is a difference between rhetoric and action. Guess one is more likely to get people killed?

          • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

            maybe a youtube video is more likely to get people killed. Bush could not have legally sent people off to get killed unless he had the votes for the authorization of war. Bush isn’t in office and he can’t run again. Hillary is SOS, albeit the outgoing SOS. you make the call on that one.

          • salvagesalvage

            Sorry, I have no idea what you are babbling about here, deep breath, think (I know) and try again.

          • salvagesalvage

            Sorry, I have no idea what you are babbling about here, deep breath, think (I know) and try again.

        • TexSizzle

          Sorry, Herr Goebbels. We aren’t buying it. Bless your heart.

          • salvagesalvage

            Ha! Ha! Yes! I am a Nazi!

          • lainer51

            who cares?

          • VerminMcCann

            Fantastic job missing the point. He wasn’t calling you a Nazi; he was calling you a liar.

          • salvagesalvage

            Yeah, gosh me stupid for thinking he was calling me a Nazi when he literally called me a Nazi.

          • VerminMcCann

            No, literally calling you a Nazi goes like this: You’re a Nazi.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      wow, “wing nuts”. you’ve used this on nearly every post. you are a hypocrite and an original one at that. You must be a great crowd-pleaser during open microphone night at the Laff Shak.

    • VerminMcCann

      Sorry sport. “Out of context” doesn’t mean what you seem to think it does. Cankles has been quoted accurately and in context. What she said is every bit as damning as we “wingnuts” think it is.

  • wyatt81

    You don’t question anyone on the left, especially the elites that the media worships. And protects. Left wing royalty rules now and they will continually remind the public of it. If reminding doesn’t work, then bullying, threats, slander, and attacks will follow. Hillary, like Obama, feels she does not have to be answerable to anyone. For anything-even Americans dying and bald faced lies being dispensed like pez. Who are we to demand answers from the smartest woman on earth! Be gone, ignorant rabble!

  • tomincol

    Goodness sakes, now everyone knows why they stonewalled until after the election on this terror attack.

  • stacy meros

    I’m just flat out sick to my stomach. No wonder there is no honor in the US today. So what can we do about this, Patriots? Do we just take it, post our shocked comments, and go on or do we work together to right this ship?

  • Catchance

    Obama: “It was a bump in the road.”

    Hillary: “What difference does it make?”

    Biden: “Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?”

    So much class.

  • nc

    Since Watergate the libbies have always lectured us that “it’s not the crime, it’s the cover up.”

    Honest mistakes can be forgiven, but we cannot handle these lies. And we really don’t appreciate being made to feel like WE’RE out of step for demanding the straight story.

  • 1SkepticalChick

    Hillary speak for “Whatever”.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      shorter Hillary: “I am not an animaaaaaaaalllll!”

      • 1SkepticalChick

        hen maybe she’s a fire hydrant. With all those little Domo doggies circling her marking their spots.

  • $30158943

    She is right, at the time it made no difference what caused it but to care for those injured. Of course it makes all the difference to Republican Senators who are deathly afraid she will run in 2016 and keep them the rump party.

    • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

      it made so little difference, that they immediately thought the YouTube video was to blame. So it was important then to prosecute the video makers, but it isn’t important now?!

      • $30158943

        When all of North Africa was rioting over the video everyone thought that. This is about one thing, the GOP trying to kneecap Hillary before 2016. There are attacks on our posts every year but the GOP never investigated those. If they really cared the House wouldn’t have cut State’s security budget.

        • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

          I bet if they weren’t spending major coin on Volt recharging stations in Austria, they would have plenty of security money. even so, they should’ve had enhanced security b/c of the upcoming 9/11 anniversary.

          • Guest

            and they pushed that “YouTube video” nonsense for a month after the riots. you make it sound like they dropped the video angle immediately after realizing that it didn’t happen.

        • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

          Turtle Head spewed: “ If they really cared the House wouldn’t have cut State’s security budget.
          .
          Then reality replied: “Still, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Charlene Lamb testified in October that the size of the attack — and not the money — was the issue.
          .
          Asked if there was any budget consideration that led her not to increase the security force, she said: “No.”
          .
          She added: “This was an unprecedented attack in size.” Asked again about budget issues, Lamb said: “Sir, if it’s a volatile situation, we will move assets to cover that.

          .
          http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/24/republicans-challenge-clinton-claims-on-budget-cuts-benghazi-cable/
          .
          Sucks to be you, boy.

        • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

          Turtle Head spewed: “ If they really cared the House wouldn’t have cut State’s security budget.
          .
          Then reality replied: “Still, then-Deputy Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Charlene Lamb testified in October that the size of the attack — and not the money — was the issue.
          .
          Asked if there was any budget consideration that led her not to increase the security force, she said: “No.”
          .
          She added: “This was an unprecedented attack in size.” Asked again about budget issues, Lamb said: “Sir, if it’s a volatile situation, we will move assets to cover that.

          .
          http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/24/republicans-challenge-clinton-claims-on-budget-cuts-benghazi-cable/
          .
          Sucks to be you, boy.

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Hi, the Clue Store called and said your Clue is in. Go pick it up immediately!

    • http://www.facebook.com/corey.dennison Corey Dennison

      Hi, the Clue Store called and said your Clue is in. Go pick it up immediately!

  • George Washington Mclintock

    Sweet Jesus, the woman has gotten more evil as she as has aged. I didn’t think it was possible. I will personally donate to see an ad reminding America of her callousness run everyday in 2016.

  • $2120193

    It would have made a HUGE difference in a little election that was happening right about then!

  • Snarky D

    #whatdifferencedoesitmake When you’re a Clinton? That depends on what the meaning of the word “it” is.

  • el_polacko

    “what difference does it make what happened? it’s our job to find out what happened so it doesn’t happen again,” HUH ???

  • BeeKaaay

    What difference does it make? Leftwingwackos are bloodthirsty, that’s why. Dead Americans give them the happies.

  • [email protected]

    Typical “clinton speak”; attack and deflect”…keeps accountability at bay!!

  • People Corporation

    Whats the difference if they accidentally walked in front of a bus, or I killed them to tie up some loose ends on our illegal weapon smuggling to Al Qaeda in Syria scheme? They’re all dead, a bus may or may not have been involved and republican cutbacks in bus safety funding is the real issue!
    –PIAPS

  • KornKing

    Translation: “you obviously don’t know who you’re talking to”

  • leftwingthom

    i don’t really understand the full story of what happened, but from what i can discern from the twitter posts, sounds like people are mad at the pres for lying about the situation in Benghazi. Well as for the WH lying about a foreign situation, wouldn’t be the first time. Remember our last president?

  • qualityrkc

    The main issue I have with this ordeal is that there is not and never was a consulate in benghazi. Look for yourself, no mention on any government websites prior to the attack. Nothing. There was no consulate there. So whaqt is really going on here?

  • Terrell Guell

    I am proud that Ron Johnson is my senator

  • AZcommenter

    “At this point, what difference does it make?”

    It’s understandable that Hillary is frustrated. She and Obama blatantly lied to the American public for weeks last summer about what really happened in Benghazi. Back in the summer, the identity and motive of the Benghazi attackers made a difference, because it would have diminished Obama’s re-election chances if the American public had known that the 9/11 Benghazi attack was the result of a planned and co-ordinated AQ terror attack, and not the result of a “spontaneous street protest.” It made a big difference then, and that’s why Obama and Hillary lied about it.

    If the American public knew the true identity and motive of the attackers, they also would have known (1) that Obama’s boasts about having decimated AQ were baloney, and (2) that Obama’s unilateral decision to use the U.S. military to oust Quadaffi had actually strengthened rather than weakened AQ in Africa, and (3) that the Obama State Dept. was completely unprepared for the fallout from Quadaffi’s ouster, and had left our ambassador and dozens of other Americans as sitting ducks for AQ terrorists, despite the ambassador’s recent and persistent pleas for better security. If the American public had known the facts about Obama’s massive incompetence, it might have made a difference in the outcome of the presidential election. That’s why Hillary and Obama (and his surrogate, Susan Rice) lied and lied and lied. Because last summer, they knew the truth made a difference, a big difference, to Obama’s re-election prospects.

    But “at this point,” (that point being the one at which the administration’s co-ordinated lies, along with the supportive media disinformation campaign, have worked and Obama is safely re-elected): what difference does it make? So our ambassador and three other brave Americans were betrayed by the Obama administration and left to die horrible deaths in Benghazi at the hands of crazed AQ terrorists. What difference does it make? Obama was re-elected, and that’s what really matters, right Hillary?

  • BeeKaaay

    Hillary died, people died. 4 american citizens in Benghazi.

    Obama lied, people died. 300 Mexican citizens thanks to Fast and Furious.

    Gee, I see a pattern when leftwingwackos lie.

  • BeautifulAmerica

    To Googly-eyed E V I L Drama Queen in Drag: Yes, it makes a difference—to us.
    Go Out yourself in Iraq.

  • Guest

    Obama refused to authorize military assistance and rescue the Americans in Benghazi. All the sideshows by Progressive Socialists will not change that fact.
    He is a skidmark on the underwear of America.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    that’s absolutely what she said. “why” didn’t matter.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    Rachel Maddow, is that you?!?

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    “what difference does it make”. how many ways can that be interpreted? They seemed to think “why it happened” was pretty important immediately after the attack. b/c they thought they had the answer (the YouTube video). but after that blew up, they now seem to think “why” is the least important question.

  • souphands

    What words came after “what difference does it make'”? Can you tell me? Have you watched the testimony? It can be interpreted nearly a limitless number of ways considering the WHOLE SENTENCE ISN’T EVEN PRINTED HERE.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    if this was condoleezza rice, you’d be so indignant you would be crapping yourself.

  • RightThinking1

    Soup,

    Ok…, here you are:

    “The fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night one decided they’d kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?”

    Well…, in the context that dead is dead, there is no difference, but in the context of where responsibility lies (a pun!), and how truthfully events were reported, there *is* a difference in her scenarios, a very serious difference.

  • http://www.facebook.com/noah.lee3 Noah Lee

    yes, she said it is important to find out who is responsible for the attacks. I agree with that. so, why did she think the impetus for the attacks was important back then, but since they wrong as to the impetus, now they decide that it wasn’t important in the first place.

  • el_polacko

    she said that it was her job to find out what happened (so it wouldn’t happen again)…how, exactly is someone who doesn’t think that it matters what happened supposed to find out what happened ???
    p.s….NOBODY was blaming “a bunch of guys out for a walk”, hillary, so you can scratch that reason off your investigative list.