Illegals FIRST: Hakeem Jeffries Gives Up the Plot About Why They're REALLY Blocking...
COMPROMISED?! DataRepublican Pulls BACK the Curtain on Sen. John Thune, and WOW, This...
CNN BACKPEDALS After Posting/Deleting Abhorrent Post Framing Bomb-Throwing Jihadis As Vict...
CNN DELETES Ludicrous Post Making Bomb-Throwing Jihadis the REAL VICTIMS After X Opens...
Disgusting! Mamdani Hosts Columbia Hamas Superfan Mahmoud Khalil for Ramadan Meal at Graci...
Oh Look, Bluesky's Getting a New CEO – Because the Online Asylum Was...
'More Fun to Sink Them': Trump Celebrates as 46 Iranian Warships Become Artificial...
Scott Jennings Tries Reasoning With Dems Who’re Leaving Americans Open to Terrorism for...
California’s Unique Primary Could See Two Republicans Vying for Governor If Some Dems...
Kinder-Hearted: Dem James Talarico Says, Besides Family and Friends, He Also Loves Trans...
UK Appoints 'Anti-Muslim Hostility Czar,' Claims It Won’t Restrict Ability to Criticize Is...
Maggie Vs. MAGA: Director’s Severe TDS Led to Massive Box Office Bomb With...
Nicholas Kristof Considers Alternative Theory for Decline in Iranian Missile Launches
Brave Hero Marine Leaves Hospital, Poses for Photo With Palestinian Flag
Hysterical: Women Led in Group Screaming Session for International Women’s Day Protest

Ketanji Brown Jackson assuages skeptics' concerns with reminder that 'free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen' [video]

If you’re just joining us, it’s Day 3 of the Senate confirmation hearings for Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Jackson Brown. She’s fielded a lot of questions so far, but, to be fair, not every single question has been super relevant to the situation. Some issues won’t really factor into things if she gets a seat on the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

But when it comes to stuff like, say, the First Amendment and freedom of speech … well, those seem like topics that you’d definitely want to be brought up during a confirmation hearing for a potential Supreme Court Justice.

And those topics did come up. Unfortunately, Ketanji Brown Jackson’s take on them doesn’t really inspire a whole lot of confidence in her ability to apply the Constitution in interpreting the law:

Her words:

“If there is speech that is an incitement to violence, that’s one circumstance in which the government might be able to prevent it. But, other than that, short of that, um, free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen.”

We get where she’s coming from when it comes to incitement to violence (assuming that she’s talking about actual incitement to violence as opposed to, say, pointing out that a biological male is not a woman. But what’s this “free speech is supposed to be allowed to happen” business? Let’s take another look at the First Amendment, in case we just missed that part somehow:

Advertisement

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hmmm. “Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom of speech.” Seems pretty cut and dried. Nothing about how Congress is not supposed to make any law abridging the freedom of speech.

Yeah, seems like we’re pretty much at that point.

***

Related:

Ketanji Brown Jackson unable to define ‘woman’ because she’s not a biologist (maybe Biden could help)

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos