Meet the Canadian Katherine Maher: Head of CBC Is EXACTLY As Deranged a...
Monopoly on DERP: Elizabeth Warren Sounds Off on Apple iPhone and Gets Blasted
Protesters Say Dexter Reed Was Shot, Assassinated, and Overly-Killed
Brian Stelter Concerned Pro-Trump Propaganda Media Will Publicize Jurors
Sunny Hostin of 'The View' Fears a Trump Supporter Will 'Sneak' Onto the...
Woman Complains That Men Do Nothing When 'Abusive Drug-Addled Bum' Terrorizes Train Car
Pallywood: Palestinian Women Devastated at the Loss of a Loved One in Gaza
BREAKING: Washington Post Writer Doesn't Read The Washington Post
A Constitutional Crisis of the Democrats' Making
Elon Musk Calls NPR CEO Katherine Maher 'One of the Worst Human Beings...
Check Out These Highlights of Columbia President Beclowning Herself During Congressional H...
President Joe Biden Warns the Israelis Not to Attack Israel
SPOILED: NYC Illegal Immigrant Complains Free Food, Housing Not Good Enough and Is...
Explaining Judge Stoner’s Verdict in the Dacia Lacey Baby ‘Smothering’ Case (A Deep...
President Biden Says Voters Have to Choose Freedom Over Democracy

WaPo's Margaret Sullivan says journos are doing 'President Trump's work for him' by pressing Elizabeth Warren on funding Medicare for All

At this point, it’s really no secret that the Washington Post is all in — mind, body, and soul — for Elizabeth Warren. But you’d think that maybe, just maybe, at least someone over there would have the good sense to dial it back a little.

Advertisement

Nope. Margaret Sullivan — who loves her some Elizabeth Warren — put together a list of “Five ways the debate could have — and should have — been much, much better,” and this was number two:

2. Framing the (apparently unavoidable) question about universal health care and how to fund it in a non-gotcha way. Journalists are kindly doing President Trump’s work for him when they insist on trying to pin down Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), the new front-runner, to declare she’d raise taxes to fund Medicare-for-all. Of course, it’s legitimate to dig into the costs, but not in a way that creates a nice GOP campaign ad, and misses the larger lens of overall costs. (Warren, notably, refused to take the bait.)

So … Elizabeth Warren’s advocating a plan that would require a buttload of money, and she doesn’t really want to get into where that money’s going to come from … and asking her about it is baiting her? That’s really where we’re at?

Advertisement

It’s not really surprising at this point from a WaPo journalist … but it’s still pretty jaw-dropping in its brazenness.

***

Related:

‘OK, this is absolutely nuts’! White-hot WaPo take: Elizabeth Warren is just like Frederick Douglass because she poses for selfies

‘Trash journalism’: WaPo stomps on last remaining tiny shred of media credibility while running cover for Elizabeth Warren

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement