Thoughts and prayers to the custodial staff at Washington Post HQ. They’re really gonna have their work cut out for them, what with all the drooling.
WaPo’s powers that be have seen fit to publish a new piece on Elizabeth Warren, and it should really come with some kind of a warning:
"You knew, just by talking to her, she was going to be successful."
She faced sexism, shed a husband and found her voice teaching law in Houston.
This is where Liz Warren became Elizabeth Warren. https://t.co/BuL3bOqG20
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) October 15, 2019
In 1997, Warren was asked to eulogize longtime UH law professor Eugene Smith.
Smith specifically requested that Warren speak at his funeral.
But what she said inside a small campus chapel stunned her former colleagues.https://t.co/I8IViRTnsI
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) October 15, 2019
Ooo! Ooo! And then what happened?
this story is hot garbage
— Jake Akex (@JakeAkex) October 15, 2019
— Robin RN (@robin012009) October 15, 2019
This seems very puffy.
— Phil Hardy (@EsqHardy) October 15, 2019
No, no. Rest assured, this is journalism of the highest order. Just look:
Lord. https://t.co/PyEBDsVtAl
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
"She split with a husband who struggled with her ambition… she found her voice, developing the speaking style that has made the senator from Massachusetts a leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Houston is where Liz Warren became Elizabeth Warren."
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
"If Warren saw herself as a trailblazer for women in law, she has never acknowledged it."
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
"Warren was younger and less stuffy than the men on the faculty… Warren also seemed human."
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
Be still our hearts.
Scoop: Elizabeth Warren is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) October 15, 2019
That’s pretty much the gist of that article, yeah.
Wow. I wonder if the WaPo and the establishment media have settled on a candidate?
— Matt Bennett (@mattben10) October 15, 2019
Yeah, we wonder!
Unpaid political ad
— Trump loving swamp hater (@hawkeyefan1960) October 15, 2019
The fix is in. We haven't had a primary vote, but we know who the media wants.
— Sorry T. Offend (@SorryToOffend87) October 15, 2019
All
In. https://t.co/wnwm0CKdut— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) October 15, 2019
When the media picks their candidate, they're not subtle about it.
— CamYzerman (@CamYzerman) October 15, 2019
Not really, no.
Wow. Shameless @washingtonpost .
— susan price (@sbprice) October 15, 2019
