Earlier this week, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes made this bold assertion:
Roseanne’s problem turned out to be that she far too authentically represented the actual worldview of a significant chunk of the Trump base.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) May 30, 2018
We can’t help but wonder, then, if that same logic applies to Samantha Bee after she called Ivanka Trump a “feckless c*nt” and turned her into the butt of a gross incest joke.
Samantha Bee called Ivanka Trump a “feckless c*nt” on TV
Take it away, Molly and @chrislhayes… pic.twitter.com/zlQH0wMu2x
— Chet Cannon (@Chet_Cannon) May 31, 2018
No, it’s as @chrislhayes said, Sam Bee just “far too authentically represented the actual worldview of a significant chunk” of progressives. https://t.co/juv3qTmPOc
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) May 31, 2018
The most troubling realization is that Sam Bee speaks for a sizable chunk of the Democrat base.
— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) May 31, 2018
"Samantha Bee's problem turned out to be that she far too authentically represented the actual worldview of a significant chunk of the Hillary base." https://t.co/bx3dMwVE2b
— Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) May 31, 2018
What’s good for the goose, and all that jazz. Right, Chris?
This game is stupid.
— Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) May 31, 2018
Of course it’s stupid. Which is why boneheaded lefties like Chris Hayes need to stop playing it before they get themselves into any more trouble.
When it's turned back on them, it must be hard to swallow.
What a divide @chrislhayes supports.
— Andrew Yankowsky (@ayankowsky) May 31, 2018
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with an additional tweet.
