New York Magazine Profiles Will Stancil, 'One of Politics Twitter's Most Inescapable Power...
DEADLY DEI: UCLA Med School Docs Say 'Obesity' Is a Slur, Weight Loss...
Biden Simp Harry Sisson Says Biden's Ban on TikTok Will Hurt Black-Owned Businesses
Prosecutors in Trump’s New York Trial Prove Their Witness is a Lying 'Pecker'...
Rep. AOC Wants to Know Where Are the Journalists on the Mass Graves...
'Redacting Reality': WH Transcript Runs Cover After Joe 'Ron Burgundy' Biden's Teleprompte...
FOX News: President Biden Forgives Violinist's $250,000 Student Loan
Paging Dr. Freud: Biden's Slip of the Tongue Is the MOST Honest Thing...
Try Not to Roll Your Eyes at the United Nations' New Ally in...
NYU Protester Describes the Ordeal of Her Arrest, Assumes Cops Are White Supremacists
Biden Blesses Abortion, CNN's Romance with Radicals!
Snake in the Grass Nina Jankowicz Returns With Perfectly Named 'Disinformation' Think Tank
Pro-Palestine Protester Has to Ask a Friend Why She’s Protesting
Judge Tells Dexter Taylor, NY Man Facing YEARS in Prison the Second Amendment...
Biden Goes Full Ron Burgundy (AGAIN) and Reads EVERYTHING on the Teleprompter

Cue Lefty MELTDOWN in 3 ... 2 ... 1: SCOTUS rules Arizona's voting rules do not violate the Voting Rights Act and (and SHOCKER, they ain't RACIST)

SCOTUS has ruled that Arizona’s voting rules do not violate the Voting Rights Act.

And they are not racist.

Gosh, whoda thunk it?

But requiring an ID for voting is racist or something! REEEEEEEE!

Advertisement

You guys … check out the way NBC wrote their headline:

RESTRICTIVE.

SCOTUS just literally ruled that’s not the case but hey, whatever gets the clicks and taps, right?

From the Supreme Court ruling itself:

The plaintiffs were unable to provide statistical evidence showing that HB 2023 had a disparate impact on minority voters. Instead, they called witnesses who testified that third-party ballot collection tends to be used most heavily in disadvantaged communities and that minorities in Arizona—especially Native Americans—are disproportionately disadvantaged. 329 F. Supp. 3d, at 868, 870. But from that evidence the District Court could conclude only that prior to HB 2023’s enactment, “minorities generically were more likely than non-minorities to return their early ballots with the assistance of third parties.” Id., at 870. How much more, the court could not say from the record. Ibid. Neither can we. And without more concrete evidence, we cannot conclude that HB 2023 results in less opportunity to participate in the political process.

Advertisement

So protecting the integrity of elections is NOT racist.

Gosh, we’re shocked.

Oh, wait, no.

***

Related:

Meghan McCain leaving #TheView (and seriously, with rabid Joy Behar as a cohost who could blame her?)

Holy CRAP! Here’s an INSANELY long and infuriating thread of each and every single LIE the Left and media have pushed (are still pushing)

Creepy AF –> Rick Wilson telling Chris Hayes about ‘very very dirty boys’ who ‘like to have their little backsides paddled’ is NOT a great look

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement