Scott Jennings to John Avlon: Did Dems Promote Unity by Voting $50 Million...
Chillin’ Canine: Coyote Chased and Captured in Chicagoland Aldi Grocery Store in Viral...
Retailing Retelling: Walmart’s Logo ‘Rebrand’ Skews Change for More of the Same
Deportations Hurt the Economy? Border Czar Tom Homan Says There’s No Price on...
Pull the Liar Alarm! Brian Stelter’s ‘Fact-Checker’ Firefighter Analogy Gets Hosed by Trut...
There's Still Someone Out There Defending Kamala Harris' Pick of Tim Walz
WATCH: Trump Reveals What Obama ‘Really’ Said to Him at Carter's Funeral (LOL)
Former State Dept. Official Thinks Israel Should Have Done Nothing in Response to...
Receipt King Drew Holden Savagely Toasts Jen Rubin in Epic Exit Roast
Daily Mail Slams Billionaire Tycoon Who Just Donated $5 Million to the LA...
Yellowstone's Finale Fell Flat, but They Steered Clear of Wokeness
Sunny Hostin Is Disgusted by the Politicization of the Wildfires, Blames Trump's Wall
Remembering a 2024 Doozy: Hillary Clinton Made an Argument for Why She Should...
Jennifer Rubin’s New Venture Promises Humor and Pro-Democracy Cooking Columns
Did ‘Climate Change’ Just Get a Name and Face? Man Charged with Arson...

'How about quid pro NO': Sharyl Attkisson fact-checking accusations of Trump's Ukraine quid pro quo is a beautiful thing

Sharyl Attkisson was good enough to fact-check the claims of Trump’s quid pro quo in Ukraine in a fairly spectacular read.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

Foreign aid is widely considered a tool to allow the U.S. “access and influence in the domestic and foreign affairs of other states,” particularly “national security policy.” It also “helps governments achieve mutual cooperation on a wide range of issues.”

All of this appears to neatly fit the definition of the very things President Trump’s critics allege he did: try to ensure Ukraine’s cooperation in the U.S. investigation into the 2016 presidential campaign, and obtain a commitment from Ukraine to open an investigation into widespread corruption that could have U.S. ties — including a possible tie to the 2020 presidential election.

Here’s the best part:

All things considered, it begins to look like the quid pro quo accusations are an extension of the strategy that sought to keep President Trump from providing typical direction to the Justice Department for the better part of two years … because his critics cried that it would be obstruction of justice or interfering with the Mueller probe. With that investigation closed, Trump’s enemies appear to be trying to keep him from digging into dark, uncomfortable places about how it all came about and who was behind it, from Washington, D.C., to Kyiv, Ukraine.

And why would they want to keep Trump from digging?

She tweeted out some more points:

Advertisement

Opinion.

Subjective.

Key words.

She’s so good at this.

Other reporters could learn a thing or five from her.

So orange man not bad?

Womp womp, Dems.

Advertisement

There ya’ go.

Always a troll or 12 who show up when Sharyl tweets … and she always handles them just fine.

Heh.

Boom.


Related:

Melting DOWN: Byron York calling Dems OUT for not releasing Taylor’s full testimony triggers a WHOLE lotta stupid

Well well well, what do we have here? William Taylor met with Schiff’s staffer in Ukraine 4 days prior to leak

‘Endangers our staff’: Daily Caller’s response to AOC accusing them of being white supremacists makes her look even more DESPICABLE

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement