Chris Murphy says he has no words.
I have no words… https://t.co/TpkvTWd8sT
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) May 16, 2019
If only that were true.
He should probably put together a global coalition that forces Iran to the table, and negotiate a deal that ends Iran’s nuclear program, complete with comprehensive inspections from the IAEA.
— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) May 16, 2019
Oh, good, Schatz for Brains chimed in.
But I would want that deal to force them to shut down their path to a plutonium bomb, end weapons grade enrichment, get rid of their uranium stockpile, and also the inspectors would need to go anywhere, even military sites if needed. But all that’s not possible, right?
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) May 16, 2019
Either these yahoos paid ZERO attention to what Obama’s ‘Iran Deal’ actually did (didn’t) do or they assume their idiot base is too uninformed to know the difference.
Probably both.
That seems like a reach, but man that would be an enormous diplomatic achievement. It would make Israel, the region, and the world safer.
— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) May 16, 2019
If we rolled our eyes any further back in our heads we’d probably do permanent damage to ourselves.
Brian, I just did some quick online research and I have BIG NEWS.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) May 17, 2019
Chris, we did some quick online research as well and WE have big news.
From The Hill:
Sanctions may not have finally prevented Iran from stopping its nuclear program, but they were really starting to hurt the regime. After all, it was the pain from those sanctions and isolation that brought Iran to the negotiating table in the first place.
But President Obama sought to allay concerns, insisting he was willing to walk away if the deal wasn’t good. This was quickly disproven.
For example, Iran was permitted to keep some key technology necessary for making a nuclear weapon. While only at lower levels, Iran was permitted to continue enriching uranium, an irreversible blow to what’s left of the nonproliferation regime. We were promised “anytime, anywhere” inspections, but by the time the deal was done, verification, while still hailed as the toughest verification regime in history, still only allows managed access to Iranian sites, and the agreement was written with such ambiguity as to allow the Iranians to continue to insist certain sites remain off limits.
And then, as we all know, Obama sent Iran pallets of cash …
Such a WIN.
You are starting a podcast?
— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) May 17, 2019
Ok, Schatz is a total nob but this was almost funny.
Actually, that’s a horrible idea, but do continue to sound uncontrollably inane while you ineffectually pat yourself on the back. You with a podcast would be an echo chamber of ineptitude.
— G (@TCC_Grouchy) May 17, 2019
A terrible idea, but funny.
That’s a brilliant idea. But no.
Apparently we HAD an agreement that did all those things (I know!) and Trump tore it up, and then did a whole bunch more stuff that his military advisors told him might lead to war.
Anyway, sometimes the internet is wrong but that’s what I found
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) May 17, 2019
How can Connecticut stand this guy? Seriously.
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and confirm it.
— G (@TCC_Grouchy) May 17, 2019
Ain’t that the truth?
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member