Running on Empty: 94% of US Government Employees Work at Home Far From...
Sen. Joni Ernst Tells Fox Why She’s Not a ‘Yes’ on Pete Hegseth
In Boldest Move Yet, Leftists Prove Their Moral Superiority by Dancing on Insurance...
Republican Calls DOGE Two People Who Know Nothing About How Government Works and...
Jeff Bezos Wants to Convince Trump the Press Is Not the Enemy of...
Truth HURTS: UNRWA Says Israel Labeling It a 'Terrorist Organization' Is Hate Speech
'I'm Embarrassed': Francis Ford Coppola Apologizes for 'Godfather II' Starting 'Sequel Tre...
As Jury Deliberations Continue, Jordan Neely's Father Sues Daniel Penny
New Scandal: Pete Hegseth Visited the 9/11 Memorial in His Underwear
Beer Banshees: ‘Journos’ Shriek Over Pete Hegseth Drinking Alcohol on St. Patrick’s Day
How Convenient: Amnesty International Changes Definition of 'Genocide' to Attack Israel
We Got Nothin': Guess What Justice Sotomayor Says Is Comparable to 'Gender Affirming'...
Unanimous: Boston City Council Votes 13-0 to Reaffirm Sanctuary City Status
CUH-RAZY! Actor Matthew Marsden Simply Saying He Has 9 Kids Triggers BATS**T Rage-Fit...
A Tale of Two Presidents: NYT ‘Journos’ Churn Out Pro-Dem Prose for Biden’s...

Just WOW: Sharyl Attkisson connects the dots behind Deep State's 'Trump insurance policy' and it's CHILLING

Sharyl Attkisson’s latest piece on the intelligence community’s ‘insurance policy’ when it comes to Trump is fascinating and terrifying all at once.

Advertisement

From The Hill:

Assume, for the sake of argument, that powerful, connected people in the intelligence community and in politics worried that a wildcard Trump presidency, unlike another Clinton or Bush, might expose a decade-plus of questionable practices. Disrupt long-established money channels. Reveal secret machinations that could arguably land some people in prison.

What exactly might an “insurance policy” against Donald Trump look like?He would have to be marginalized at every turn. Strategies would encompass politics, the courts, opposition research and the media. He’d have to become mired in lawsuits, distracted by allegations, riddled with calls for impeachment, hounded by investigations. His election must be portrayed as the illegitimate result of a criminal or un-American conspiracy.

To accomplish this, bad actors in the intel community could step up use of surveillance tools as a weapon to look for dirt on Trump before his inauguration. They could rely on dubious political opposition research to secretly argue for wiretaps, plant one or more spies in the Trump campaign, then leak to the press a mix of true and false stories to create a sense of chaos.

Read the whole piece HERE.

This is one of those pieces that as you read it you think to yourself, ‘Holy crap, she’s right.’ We see and hear so much noise that it’s easy to get confused about what is actually going on, and as usual, Sharyl spells it out in a way that anyone can understand.

Even this editor.

Makes perfect sense if you think about it … which is chilling.

So of course the Left was front and center to attack Sharyl and the piece:

Yeah, lots of traction.

https://twitter.com/HanschElaine/status/1027769579345391617

*eye roll*

She says from the beginning of the article, ‘Assume for the sake of argument …’

What do you want to bet the folks complaining didn’t bother to read the piece?

Typical.

In reality all the piece really does is spell things out …

No wonder the Left has their britches all bunched up over it.

Advertisement

Related:

RUUUN AWAAAY! Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez DRAGGED for comparing Ben Shapiro’s debate offer to a CATCALL

‘Care about REAL issues or SHUT UP!’ Candace Owens takes Jennifer Rubin APART and DAMN

Oh HONEY! Chelsea Handler gets seriously REKT for telling CRAY-CRAY lies to stop #Kavanaugh

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement