She Really Went THERE?! Jen Psaki Let's the Mask SLIP on Morning Joe...
Maxine Waters Goes on Unhinged, Anti-Trump Rant on MSNBC
Democrat Woman's Face While Biden Accidentally Tells the Truth About His Crap Agenda...
Biden's Latest Gaffe on Taxes Is a Refreshingly Unintentional Moment of Honesty
Gen-Z Lefties Dropping Selfies With Their Ages BRAGGING About Voting for Biden BACKFIRES...
Just. WOW: DNC War Room Learns the Hard Way What FAFO Means After...
Three Simple Tweets Prove Without a DOUBT How Much the Biden Admin Actually...
'All PLANNED': Wokal Distance OWNS Protesters in EPIC Thread About Encampments (and Shutti...
Best and Brightest: Columbia Students Spell Palestine Wrong
'Keep Our Language OUT of Your Mouth': AOC Pisses X Off With Impressively...
'Swarmed by an Angry Mob': Custodian at Columbia University Speaks Out to The...
Little Davy Wants a Choo-Choo: Life Failure David Hogg Joins the High-Speed Rail...
Just for Fun: Let's Make Fun of the 2024 Met Gala
'60 Minutes' Discovers New Concepts in Education - High Expectations and Discipline
Cosplaying Student Activists, Including Feminists, Seem to Be Converting to Islam

Frum-DUMB: David Frum thinks he has the PERFECT gun control law, there's just ONE problem

Who wants to tell him?

Advertisement

David, that’s already the law.

You know, gun control fanatics might stop demanding new laws around gun control if they actually understood the gun control laws that are already on the books. Then again, probably not.

From the United States Dept. of Justice:

This bill passed with almost unanimous support and represents Congress’s recognition that “anyone who attempts or threatens violence against a loved one has demonstrated that he or she poses an unacceptable risk, and should be prohibited from possessing firearms.” Congressional Record, p. S11878, September 30, 1996. This new provision affects law enforcement in three interrelated ways. First, it will assist in preventing those individuals who have demonstrated a propensity for domestic violence from obtaining a firearm. Second, it will assist law enforcement by providing a tool for the removal of firearms from certain explosive domestic situations thus decreasing the possibility of deadly violence. Finally, it will serve as a federal prosecution tool in certain situations where alternatives have failed.

Advertisement

Funny that eh?

And considering the state of Texas had denied Devin Kelley a license to carry, the fact he had a gun at all was already illegal. Nothing about what Kelley did was legal, the system of laws and regulations FAILED. So why would we add more laws? Or laws that we already have?

https://twitter.com/RedWest1/status/927580773149949952

The problem is they do so little research and so much yammering.

https://twitter.com/dlh8/status/927598651215568896

Crazy thought: True.


Related:

SETTLED: Governor Abbott clears up the ‘legal or illegal’ debate on Devin Kelley’s gun (Left hardest hit)

Sit DOWN! Sheriff Joe Tackitt OWNS media asking about gun control after Texas church shooting

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement