Reading this tweet from Chuck Ross on how Andrew McCabe nonchalantly told a bunch of people at an event that Steele told the FBI he could not vouch for all of the materials in the dossier, (you know, the one they used to obtain surveillance warrants) all this editor can do is scratch her head.

And he said this in ‘support’ of Steele?

Couldn’t vouch for it.

Alrighty then.

From The Daily Caller:

McCabe, who served as deputy director of the FBI during the investigation, defended the FBI’s decision to open the investigation, which initially focused on Papadopoulos, Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Carter Page.

He also sought to defend Steele and his salacious dossier, which the FBI used to obtain surveillance warrants on Page.

“It is raw source reporting,” McCabe said, “and Steele presented it as such.”

“We knew that Steele was working a number of different sources, some of which has sub-sources, and sub-sub-sources, and he would represent that in the reporting, as any good source should. It didn’t come with his imprimatur of, ‘this is all gospel.’ It was like, ‘this is what I’m hearing,’” said McCabe, who is under Justice Department investigation.

“That’s how good sources report.”

Good sources report by making up unfounded gossip about a presidential candidate and then using it to basically spy on them?

Alrighty then.

Are they out of their freaking MINDS?!

Don’t answer that.

If only they’d been so forthright in general.



‘You don’t get to SIT out’: John Hayward’s thread telling ‘TrueCons’ to get it TOGETHER for Conservatism an EPIC must read

OMG-LOL, she’s still going! Expensive hairdo digs must’ve REALLY triggered AOC because she raged all day (and all night)

Not only no but HELL NO: Whistleblower attorneys ask Congress to allow his testimony to be submitted in WRITING

Recommended Twitchy Video