Rachel Maddow interviewed some former fancy-schmancy government type guy named David Laufman so she could continue to push the idea that Trump should have been charged with obstruction of justice because reasons …
Interesting how the same people who have spent two years telling us how it’s ‘Mueller Time’ suddenly don’t trust his findings or conclusions.
Interesting description here of the "balancing test" for assessing whether to charge obstruction. Full video here: https://t.co/LqGAsug9Iq pic.twitter.com/YZfZ6dPTBw
— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) March 26, 2019
LOOK SEE! HE USED A BUNCH OF BIG WORDS AND SAID SOMETHING ABOUT A BALANCING TEST SO BOOM OBSTRUCTION! TOLD YOU!!!
We still don’t understand how Trump could have obstructed justice if there was no crime to obstruct in the first place but HEY, what do we know?
Repeat after us, Rachel: No collusion.
Like we said, painful.
No means no. https://t.co/CswOfdqb5R
— Justice Time (@JustinTraver3) March 26, 2019
Oof.
How much balance would the imbalanced ask for if an imbalanced could balance balancing?
— Muellerfreude Gordon (@StillCrankyAF) March 26, 2019
Ahem, we were told there would be NO math.
Kinda screws with the narrative, I know, but could it be that Mueller is possibly a man of integrity after all? That the Special Counsel carefully weighed the evidence collected & found nothing to support prosecution?
— Smirque de Sar (@FoundersGirl) March 26, 2019
Ahem. Orange man bad.
You lied for two years
You shoved a hoax down America's throat–for two years.And you haven't realized what a tool for Putin you are.
— mallen (@mallen2010) March 26, 2019
Recommended
Cool.
Now apply "balancing test" to Clinton.— Justur AverageJoe©️ (@JAveragejoe) March 26, 2019
For two years- Rachel Madcow and the rest of the MSNBC clowns have pushed the Trump/Russia Collusion hoax. In any other industry besides the Fake News media, people would be fired for their lies. MSNBC should be embarrassed for their two year nightly hoax. All for ratings. Sick.
— Jason B. (@Jason_toronto) March 26, 2019
— Justice Time (@JustinTraver3) March 26, 2019
Obstruction to what? The investigation was completed. No collusion found! Move on!
— Rick Smith (@Rickertarian) March 26, 2019
Poor Rachel. Grief is hard. pic.twitter.com/Mv7ezf0x1g
— Nigel Fairservice (@fensandspineys) March 26, 2019
HA!
Give it time, Rachel.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member