Stay classy, New York Times:
No violence in the West Bank. No violence in Jordan. No protests in the Arab Street. Only Hamas. Only a terrorist group that urged its militants to attack Israel. Terrorists who refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist. And this is how the NYT covers it. Shame. pic.twitter.com/5UFHiPP8va
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) May 15, 2018
It’s almost like the NYT is siding with Hamas.
Interesting how Israel seems to be the only country not allowed to defend its borders … well, except for the United States but that’s another story.
Are you serious? Journalists are supposed to report on facts and facts require context which is totally missing from this incendiary, misleading headline.
— Michael A. Koplen (@MichaelAKoplen) May 15, 2018
Sadly yes, they are serious.
@nytimes sides with the terrorists. Pretty obvious.
— JWF (@JammieWF) May 15, 2018
It’s pretty damn obnoxious, right?
Odd…where did all of that billowing black smoke come from and why is it there?
— Never Give Up… (@PCGalloway) May 15, 2018
Well, clearly that’s completely Israel’s fault.
Excellent point and perspective on yesterday, the tragedy of which the American media missed and distorted. Predictably so.
— Philbert (@pcgstl) May 15, 2018
Those poor demonstrators with their Molotov cocktails and knives.
And that's why we call it "fake news" @nytimes
— Becky (@BeckyRippy) May 15, 2018
They just keep living up to their name, don’t they?
LOL … Imagine the NYT publishing this headline after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor: 'AMERICANS KILL DOZENS IN PEAL HARBOR.'
Technically accurate but intellectually dishonest and misleading.
— Deplorable John ☢ (@JohnGAR911) May 15, 2018