Susan Sarandon has been very, very vocal about her distaste for the failed presidential candidate (and pantsuit aficionado), Hillary Clinton. So vocal in fact that many people were attacking her during the election because she refused to back the queen.

Would appear Susan remains unimpressed with Grammy Clinton.

From The Hill:

Actress Susan Sarandon in an interview published Sunday said the presidency wouldn’t be much smoother with Hillary Clinton instead of President Trump, saying that the former Democratic nominee was “dangerous.”

“It wouldn’t be much smoother. Look what happened under Obama that we didn’t notice,” Sarandon told The Guardian.

“I did think [Clinton] was very, very dangerous. We would still be fracking, we would be at war,” Sarandon said.

Sarandon was often critical of Clinton during the 2016 presidential election.

Truth hurts, Hilldawg.

Hillary apologists are almost as annoying as Franken apologists – you know what, maybe it’s a draw.

It has nothing to do with being a woman.

These people think they would have been rich enough to get through ‘President Hillary’? HA!

Actually, Hillary helped Trump get elected by not visiting Wisconsin, calling half the country ‘deplorable,’ and by being Satan incarnate.

It’s true.

Don’t you just love how these tolerant Lefties attack their own when they DARE disagree?

Good times.

We’re sure she’s totally heartbroken too.

Stay classy, Hillary minions.


DAMN son! Benghazi hero Kris Paronto STOMPS James Comey for kissing ‘free (fake) press’ ass

Lowest of the LOW: Could Joy Reid be ANY nastier or more hateful to rural America?

LOL: How’s Bernie Sanders ‘laying groundwork for 2020’ run? Place your bets!