'Do You Hear Yourselves?' Mother Jones Raises the Alarm That Science Will END...
It's (D)ifferent When They Do It: Dems Once Sang Different Tune When Clinton...
WINNING: DOGE Wins Access to Data at Three Federal Agencies
Here's the RECEIPT! J.D. Vance Was Right About Europe Outlawing Prayer (Including in...
'Trying to Hide Something'? All X Posts From a Certain Former FBI Agent...
Drinking Games: Wannabe Hall Monitor Matt Yglesias Gets DRAGGED for Lame Smear of...
Much Stunning, So Brave! Sheryl Crow Dumps Her Tesla, Donates to NPR to...
Here's the Big Anti-DOGE Protest Outside a Manhattan Tesla Dealership
NY Times Condemns Trump WH for Denying AP a Right That's 'Enshrined in...
Mollie Hemingway and Others Sink NYT Journo's Attempt to Make JD Vance a...
New York Times Correspondent Calls AP as ‘Straight as They Come’
Take a Bow, Joe! NY Post Reports Biden Set a Record During His...
Sen. Chris Murphy Watched Biden Pardon Family and Friends but Says THIS Is...
Scott Jennings: Trump and Musk Have a Politically Popular Plan with Momentum on...
Victor Davis Hanson: Europeans Rejected JD Vance Because They’re the International Version...

WaPo & NY Times' 5-year-old Pulitzer brags are aging like milk in the hot summer sun

Back in 2018 the Washington Post and New York Times were awarded Pulitzer prizes for their reporting about Donald Trump colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. That alleged collusion culminated in the egregious sin of robbing the 42nd president’s wife — who had also served as Barack Obama’s secretary of state — of her apparent birthright:

Advertisement

Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post for national reporting. For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that drastically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the president-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration. (The New York Times entry, submitted in this category, was moved into contention by the Pulitzer board and then jointly awarded the prize.)

At the time the Washington Post was proud:

The New York Times also spiked the “journalism” ball:

Advertisement

“Reporters” ended up translating to “stenographers for whatever angles the Democrats were pushing to affect a presidential election.”

The release of the Durham report has completely vaporized claims that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. It was all an invention of the Hillary campaign with help from Obama, Biden, Comey, Lynch, Brennan and many others at the highest levels of U.S. government.

Not only will the Post and NY Times’ Pulitzer brags not be deleted, but they’ll most likely never even be updated to explain that the stories were bogus.

We are just going to go ahead and guess that no, none of these media outlets will show any contrition after accepting Pulitzers for pushing a totally bogus story. Conversely, they never would have been awarded Pulitzers if those same stories were about Democrat candidates — even if those stories were completely factual.

Advertisement

What’s worse, there will be zero MSM introspection. “Journalism” is, with rare exceptions, completely dead.

***

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement