Rolling Stone has proven time and time again that if you’re looking for responsible and accurate journalism, keep looking. The magazine’s take on the Supreme Court’s EPA ruling sums up Rolling Stone-style “journalism” as well as anything (maybe they’re trying to get AOC and Elizabeth Warren to subscribe):

The “journalism” is strong with that one. Not that Rolling Stone will care, reality checks have been offered up about the SCOTUS ruling:

Remember the adoring RS cover featuring one of the Boston Marathon bombers? None of their miserable takes should be very surprising.

There’s certainly been no shortage of hyperventilating lefties.

“The Supreme Court shouldn’t have a say in these matters” according to the same people whose inactions end up making the Supreme Court have a say in these matters.

***

Related:

Matt Walsh: Rolling Stone writer who did hit piece on ‘What Is a Woman’ watched zero percent of the film

Rolling Stone reports that survivors are ‘sickened’ by the Amber Heard verdict, survivors disagree

Rolling Stone forced to ‘fess up to botching Donald Trump story, but not before Tommy Vietor and Peter Strzok fall headfirst for it [screenshots]