Somali Sheriff Says Now That We've Been Hired, It Means We're Working for...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
As Operations Move to Columbus, Officials Vow Not to Work With ICE
Scott Adams Thanks Perma-TDS Dems for Helping Perpetuate Trump's 'Unmatched Political Skil...
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Posts Cringe-Inducing 'Scam Stopper Showdown' Video
Photographer Critiques Vanity Fair's Photos of Trump Administration Officials
City of St. Paul Tells ICE to Cease and Desist Using City Parking...
Outrageous Stalking of ICE Ends with Epic Warning: Follow Us Again and You're...
JFK's Unknown Niece Vows to Remove Trump's Name From Building With a Pickaxe
Tara Palmeri Asks If It’s a Coincidence Trump’s DOJ Released the Epstein Photos...
Outgoing DC Police Chief Has Meltdown and a Biblical Message for the Haters
Heartbreaking Cat Theft: Amazon Delivery Man Snatches Piper by the Scruff, Leaves Family...
Sen. Van Hollen Vows to End Trump's Desecration (Then Maybe Rename It the...
When Men Run for Seats Instead of Wars: A Lament for Lost Chivalry
Bernie Sanders: The Grinch Who Blocked a Pediatric Cancer Bill for Political Leverage

Axios explains how the 1/6 Commission offers a 'new template' for congressional hearings in the future

The wheels fell off the January 6th Commission’s latest “bombshell” allegation after Secret Service agents disputed the story told by Cassidy Hutchinson about Trump’s actions on January 6th of 2021. Politico has reported that the 1/6 committee never even reached out to the Secret Service for comment before Hutchinson’s testimony (almost certainly because they knew what the response would be):

Advertisement

The Jan. 6 committee didn’t reach out to the Secret Service in the days before it aired explosive testimony about an alleged physical altercation between Donald Trump and his security detail on the day of the riot, according to an agency spokesperson.
[…]
Anthony Guglielmi, the service’s chief of communications, told POLITICO that select committee investigators did not ask Secret Service personnel to reappear or answer questions in writing in the 10 days before asking Hutchinson about the matter at the hearing.

“[W]e were not asked to reappear before the Committee in response to yesterday’s new information and we plan on formally responding on the record,” he wrote in an email. “We have and will continue to make any member of the Secret Service available.”
[…]
It’s not clear why the select panel didn’t seek further corroboration from the Secret Service as it planned Hutchinson’s hearing. Members of the select committee have said they welcome any more information about the Secret Service altercation that witnesses would provide under oath.

Axios is now reporting that this kind of thorough and responsible congressional hearing might be a good thing moving forward because of all the revelations and drama reserved for people like Rob Reiner and George Conway:

Advertisement

“A new template for effective government hearings”? Oh, please.

How they did it? A complicit media always helps.

The committee is also set up like a show trial so no defense is allowed to be presented, which also helps.

“New template”? No thanks.

Advertisement

They’ve “over-delivered on revelations” as long as you consider hearsay that’s been disputed by the people who were cited to be very revealing of the truth.

Libs and media (pardon the redundancy) in the Acela corridor bubble think this is all a big deal, but elsewhere people have other concerns.

***

Related:

Axios does some heavy lifting to help Biden & Dems spread ‘ultra MAGA’ far and wide

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement