Prosecutor: No Threats, No Obsession — Acton Fair ‘Attack’ Suspect Just Wanted to...
It's Come to THIS? Frustrated Clancy Juror Explains What the Lone Holdout Just...
Atty Forgets to Click Off Gun Safety in Botched Ambush of Ex-Wife —...
Dem Senator Says Nobody in Her Party Wants Taxpayer-Funded Care for Illegals (Then...
Do-Gooder Professor Heroically Defends Her Cheap Illegal Gardener After ICE Rightfully Arr...
They Laughed When Conservatives Said They’d Come for Your Gas Stove ... San...
Pols of Privilege: Victor Davis Hanson Says Socialists in the Spotlight Owe Everything...
Female Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial Jurors Say Defense Attorney Was Funny and Entertaining...
Ashen Passion: Adam Carolla Shocked to Learn Anti-White Dems of Color Are Hooking...
Video Lets Us Experience Lindsay Clancy Trial Deliberations From Vantage Point of ‘Lone...
Hope Walz Says Republicans' Obsession With Old State Flag Is Like a Racist...
Appeals Court Says Administration's Argument to Allow the IRS to Share Data With...
A Call From the 83rd Floor, a Mother’s Life’s Work, and a...
MS NOW’s New Membership Service Allows Users to Talk to Rachel Maddow, Joe...
The Actual Problem in the Clancy Mistrial Wasn’t the Holdout — It Was...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos