Police Release Photo of Karmelo Anthony’s Multi-Tool ‘Like With the Little Scissors’
Panefully Stupid: KTVU Reports Car Break-Ins Decline, Glass Repair Shops Hardest Hit
TRAs in Scotland Upset That Men Who Think They're Women Will Be Incarcerated...
Tulsi Gabbard Adds ANOTHER Element to Her Fauci Document Drop (Media Shaming INCOMING)
First Transgender State Legislator Sentenced to 33 Years for Child Porn, Claimed Retardati...
Sen. Chris Murphy Notes That No President Except Trump Has Ever Stolen Air...
After Beheading, Elmo Makes It Clear That He's Rooting for Team USA in...
The Atlantic's Matt Viser Went to Journalism School to Learn New Things, Like...
The Atlantic Looks at Pete Hegseth's Efforts to Diminish the Role of Blacks...
MeidasTouch: Aerial Photo Shows Grass Was Completely Destroyed by UFC 250 Freedom Event
Bill Kristol Wants You to Celebrate Juneteenth In Order to ‘Annoy MAGA’
Karoline Leavitt Spots More Reasons 'the Liberal Media Is Truly Deranged' (Algae-Gate Aler...
The Media's Spin on Reports of Reflecting Pool Vandalism Couldn't Have Been More...
The New Yorker's Review of JD Vance's New Book Is a 'Distasteful' Blend...
MAZE's Flashback to Brian Stelter Driving the Final Nail Into the 'Journalism' Coffin...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement