Byron York Fact-NUKES Team Talarico's Lie About Ken Paxton's Uvalde God Comments in...
Every Time Ro Khanna Pushes Eat the Rich Rhetoric, X Posts Pics of...
We Could Watch Jake Tapper BEG Mike Walz to Ask Trump to 'Let...
Justine Bateman Has the PERFECT Response to BBC Accusing Women With Bare Nails...
‘Male’ Shoot: New York Magazine Men’s Style Issue Features Farcical and Freakish Front...
Clueless Christiane: CNN’s Amanpour Blames ‘Series of Events’ for Public’s Distrust of Leg...
Ms. Rachel Proclaims That Black Teen Nolan Wells Didn’t Drown
CBC News 'Is Well on Its Way to Becoming a Judenfrei (Jew-Free) Broadcaster'
James Talarico Says When He Takes on This Corrupt System, He’s Doing It...
Dr. Abdul El-Sayed Means It When He Says We Desperately Need a Democrat...
Let's All Point and Laugh at the Aerospace Engineer Who Said Starship Would...
New Hollywood Movie Attacks Chris Hansen for … (Checks Notes) … Catching Pedophiles
This Is 'Journalism' at ABC ... The View’s Ana Navarro Electioneers a House...
New Republic: Trump Banning Student Loans for Majors That Don’t Earn Enough Money
Jake Tapper, Thomas Massie Play 'Fun Police' With White House Deputy Chief of...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement