Shuttering Chicago Walgreens Says It Lost $1 Million, Mostly Due to Theft
Just When You Thought California Couldn't Get Worse: Arcadia Mayor Busted as Chinese...
Chelsea Handler’s 'Brutal' Draft Roast Implodes: Ma’am, Men Have Been Registering at 18...
White TN State Rep Mobbed by Racists in Scene Reminiscent of Little Rock...
The Bulwark's Sam Stein Spins His Latest Fiction: Turns Duffy's Weekend Drives Into...
NYT’s Nicholas Kristof Spreads the Israeli Rape Dogs Smear
Nonprofit Files Lawsuit to Stop Repainting of the 'Solemn and Hallowed' Reflecting Pool
Safeguards? Nah. Ohio Flipped the Off Switch on Medicaid Verification and Let the...
Bernie Wonders Why Everything Sucks After Tripling Premiums, Printing Money, and Importing...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Boxed in: He Might Never Win Again
AOC Says States Like TN Want to 'Wipe Out Every Black Representative' While...
Bill Melugin Schools Democrats: No, Biden Did Fly in Hundreds of Thousands of...
Hakeem Jeffries Makes It Clear His 'Trump Threatens Our Norms and Institutions' BS...
The Left's Meltdown Over the Lincoln Memorial Pool Is a Perfect Reflection ......
John Fetterman's Take on Assassination Attempt Deniers Will Enrage 'Tinfoil Hat Brigade' D...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement