Shut It Down: GOP Opposition to Mike Johnson's 'Dumpster Fire' CR May Cause...
Wealth of Knowledge: Trump’s Billionaires Bring Business Skills to Battle Bloated Bureaucr...
Fly Guy: Actor Tom Cruise Awarded For Being U.S. Navy Aviation Recruitment’s Top...
Eerily Empty: Video Shows Open Mall Deserted Days Before Christmas (WATCH)
Grok ‘N’ Troll: Elizabeth Warren Finally Becomes Native American Thanks to AI and...
Doctor! Doctor! Jill Biden Leaves Behind Teaching Career For Caregiving Position in Delawa...
Suspect Luigi Mangione’s Charges Now Include Terrorism in Shooting Death of UnitedHealthca...
Hobbling Hero: Aged Actor’s Appearance Has Some Singing ‘Arnold Claus Is Coming to...
Police Officer Grinch Gets Coal For Her 'Bah Humbug' Tweet
Misquote of Trump From 2019 Making the Rounds Again in Grift
More Than 40 Percent of Young Voters OK With Murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO
Dearly Deported: Central American Leaders Not Ready For Illegal Aliens to Come Home
New York Times Correspondent Says Posting Only on Bluesky 'Is Now Its Own...
‘News’ Blues: Legacy Media Shivers and Weeps as Trump Ushers in Chilling ‘Age...
Disney Pulls Transgender Storyline From Pixar Streaming Series

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement