Escape Podcast: Ratings-Challenged CNN Appears to Have Ended Jake Tapper’s Office-Based Sh...
Freedom of the Prez: Democrat Activist ‘Journo’ Don Lemon Isn’t Ruling Out a...
Fang Pangs: Dem Eric Swalwell Decries His Transparency Standards Being Applied to Own...
BBC Asks if the UK Is Becoming Too Dog-Friendly
The Hill: GOP Calls to Get 'Undocumented Children' Out of Public Schools Grow
Newsweek: Trump Says Birthright Citizenship Wasn’t Meant for Rich People From China
Bill Melugin's 'Inflammatory Framing' of Michigan Synagogue Attack Causes Butthurt
Daily Beast: New Investigation Corroborates Claims of Woman Who Says Trump Sexually Abused...
Vox Asks If It’s Wrong to Send Your Child to a Private School
When 'Equity' Meets Reality: Trans Woman Rages as Biological Woman Cuts the Queue...
WaPo's Breaking News Indicates Eric Swalwell's Attorneys Do NOT Want Kash Patel to...
Did 'Coach' Walz Write It? X ROASTS Dems Over New 'Playbook For Winning...
‘Not Possible’ to Tell Which Twin Is the Father — Because the Mother...
Councilwoman Tells Public to Strip Off Their Clothes Made From the Cotton Picked...
Mayor Smiley: Mural for Slain Ukrainian Refugee Iryna Zarutska Must Go — It's...

Greta Van Susteren smacks down Joe Lockhart for cheap shots at Dr. Birx (and then he unwisely came back for more)

Earlier this week, former Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart took a swipe (several actually) at Dr. Deborah Birx of President Trump’s coronavirus reponse team. Lockhart took issue with the doctor who served under both the Obama and Trump administrations for not saying things to support the narrative the Left has been trying to develop:

Advertisement

Greta Van Susteren had something to say about that:

Lockhart should have slinked away in shame, but instead of addressing the points Greta made, he shifted focus:

He came back for more, so another smackdown was necessary:

Advertisement

Smackdown complete!

Fact check: TRUE.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos