Party of None: Victor Davis Hanson Says the Democrats 'Are Trying To Put...
The Horrible Things X Users Would Rather Do Than Attend a Town Hall...
Conspiracy Clowns: Sunny Hostin and Don Lemon Know Why Trump is Dismantling the...
Variety: Disney Hired Social Media Guru to Save 'Snow White' from Rachel Zegler
UK Veteran Jailed Over Facebook Comments 'Stirring Up Racial Hatred'
Hillary Clinton Wants to Weigh in on Signal 'Security Breach'
Yes, Jasmine Crockett’s Greg Abbott ‘Hot Wheels’ Busing Explanation Was a Lie -...
Cybersecurity Firm Has Been 'Made Aware' of an Employee Keying a Tesla Cybertruck
Jonathan Chait Says Conservatives Are Taunting Libs Over All They Got Wrong on...
It's OVER: Tulsi Gabbard Says Climate Change Is NOT a Threat and Democrat...
It's Not Double-Speak to Acknowledge Fossil Fuels Keep America Running
Trump Signs Sweeping EO On Election Reform Then Smacks Down CNN's Kaitlan Collins...
Federal Judge Rules That Trump Administration Must Continue Funding Voice of America
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Surrogacy Choice for Twin Boys Sparks Ethical Controversy
'To Put It Another Way': J.K. Rowling Corrects Wildly Misleading Daily Mail Headline...

John Bolton Says That DOGE Cuts Are Hurting 'Long-Term American Interests'

AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Former U.S. national security adviser John Bolton has already been hit with cuts to government spending. On the day after the inauguration, he learned that the country wasn't going to be paying for him to have a private security detail, despite threats from Iran. This wasn't even a DOGE decision … this came straight from President Trump himself, who also pulled Anthony Fauci's security.

Advertisement

Bolton has been anti-Trump for a while now — Jennifer Rubin of The Contrarian (this editor had to take a minute to remember the name of her new media venture) said back in 2023 that Bolton should run for president, as he'd "eviscerate" Donald Trump. And we all know how good Rubin's instincts are.

The Hill reports that Bolton, along with many others, say that DOGE cuts will hurt long-term American interests.

Filip Timotija reports:

Bolton said the “culture of bureaucracy” will resist and that is why, in his view, it is paramount to have enforcers capable of properly responding. 

“The question is, do you have people capable of leading the bureaucracy, of kicking the bureaucracy in the butt when it needs to happen, or you just have a bunch of guys taking names off buildings and putting people on administrative leave,” Bolton said on Friday, referencing DOGE’s focus on U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). 

“You can do it that way, but you’re you’re harming long term American interests properly understood,” he added.

The answer is no, we didn't have people capable of kicking the bureaucracy in the butt when it needed to happen. We do now.

The Hill didn't provide specific examples of exactly how DOGE's cuts would harm long-term American interests.

Advertisement

The nation's debt is over $36 trillion. That doesn't serve America's long-term interests either.

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement