Ally of Senate Candidate Caught on Camera Bragging About Doxxing ICE Agent
Pointing the Way: Sophie Cunningham Inspires More Young Girls to Stand Up for...
BOOMITY: Marco Rubio Straight-FIRE Response About Trump's Foreign Policy Is FILLED With FA...
REE! Ben Rhodes Shrieks About INTERNATIONAL LAW in His Latest and Dumbest Rant...
Grillin' With Gill: Rep Brandon Gill DEMOLISHES Woke ABA President Over DEI Policies
NJ Gov Sherrill's Furious That Trump's Made Her the Poster Dem for the...
OOPSIE! Ro Khanna's Paranoia Just Gave the Dem's Midterm (Illegal) Strategy Away and...
New Jersey Caught Letting 6,600 Non-Citizens Register To Vote
John Fetterman's Assessment of Why Zohran Mamdani Hates Netanyahu Has Triggered Lefties
Pretty Boy in the Senate: Ossoff Outspends AOC and Tlaib on Hollywood Makeup...
JB Pritzker Gets SUPER Patriotic and Yeah, I Just Threw Up in My...
Seth Dillon Just HUMILIATES Candace Owens for Accusing Him of Employing Bots With...
Midterm Panic? Try Not to Laugh When Listening to Hakeem Jeffries Say Who...
I Said What I SAID: Sophie Cunningham OWNS Woke Male Journos Asking Her...
Jessica Tarlov Learns the Hard Way SHE'S Disconnected From Reality Claiming Righties Are...

Justice Clarence Thomas Argues That 'Gender-Affirming Care' Is Sex Discrimination

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court has been hearing arguments Wednesday on the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on "gender-affirming care" for minors. Justice Sonia Sotomayor likened sex-change surgery to taking an aspirin: "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking aspirin," she argued. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shocked listeners today when she compared child sex change restrictions to bans on interracial marriages.

Advertisement

Fortunately, there was some common sense from Justice Samuel Alito who argued that civil rights are based on immutable human traits, so if gender is fluid and changing, it's not immutable.

Our favorite justice, Clarence Thomas, also came in with a "killer question."

Strangio said the plaintiff (a girl who identifies as a boy) would be allowed to get drugs for "a typical male puberty" despite having a "birth sex [of] female." That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is...sex discrimination!  Genius.

Good one.

Advertisement

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement