Immigration Council Fellow: Those Margaritas Were Placed Before Sen. Van Hollen ‘With No...
Museum Exhibit Has AWFLs Put in Shackles by a Black Man Who Welcomes...
RATIO! TMZ Poll Asking About Spencer Pratt's Possibly Misleading Campaign Ad Is NOT...
Law Prof: Trying to Spin the Russia Probe Into a Grand Conspiracy Is...
George Conway Just Said the Quiet Part Out Loud: Dems Have No Policies...
Karen Bass Worried She’s Being ‘Demonized’ in Spencer Pratt’s Violent and Hateful Ads
Obama Bros (Looking at Jon Favreau) in Meltdown: Big Names Line Up Behind...
TMZ Exclusive: Spencer Pratt Is Staying at a Hotel, Not Living in a...
Report: CA Spent Nearly $189 Million to Give Every State Prisoner an iPad
The AI Revolution No One Wants to Celebrate: Lessons from UCF Graduation
Pete Buttigieg and Penn. Dem Candidate Get Authenticity Coaching While Shooting Campaign V...
Sen. Patty Murray Asks Lee Zeldin If He Seriously Believes ’There Is Abortion...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Protests Too Much, Posts His Alcohol Use Disorders Self-Test...
Added Last-Minute as Moderator, Cenk Uygur Triggers Panel Walkout With Anti-Israel Tirade
The View Lefties Are Pretty Upset That Billy Bob Thornton Won't Help Save...

Justice Clarence Thomas Argues That 'Gender-Affirming Care' Is Sex Discrimination

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court has been hearing arguments Wednesday on the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on "gender-affirming care" for minors. Justice Sonia Sotomayor likened sex-change surgery to taking an aspirin: "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking aspirin," she argued. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shocked listeners today when she compared child sex change restrictions to bans on interracial marriages.

Advertisement

Fortunately, there was some common sense from Justice Samuel Alito who argued that civil rights are based on immutable human traits, so if gender is fluid and changing, it's not immutable.

Our favorite justice, Clarence Thomas, also came in with a "killer question."

Strangio said the plaintiff (a girl who identifies as a boy) would be allowed to get drugs for "a typical male puberty" despite having a "birth sex [of] female." That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is...sex discrimination!  Genius.

Good one.

Advertisement

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement