‘FAFO, Donald’: Gavin Newsom Signs Law Imprisoning Politicians Who Spread Election Lies
Karmelo Anthony Supporter Rages, Wants to Know What to Tell Her Five Boys
Report: Bari Weiss Poised to Oversee Editorial Operations at CNN
Another Former Capitol Staffer Confirms a Past Romantic Relationship With James Talarico
Twisted Misters: Los Angeles Chorus Has SOLVED Dems' Young Male Voter Problem With...
GUILTY: Karmelo Anthony Convicted of Murdering Austin Metcalf
Trump Calls Stephen A. Smith Low IQ, Smith Immediately Demands Debate (He Walked...
Dems in Disarray: Neera Tanden Roasts Ryan Grim as His Scandal-Plagued Buddy Platner...
The SPLC President Spat on Charlie Kirk's Grave and Instantly Regretted It
AOC's 'ALL CAPS' Dunk on Trump at the Knicks Game BACKFIRES Beautifully
OOF! Sharyl Attkisson Posts ULTIMATE Flashback Video Humiliating Hillary All OVER Again fo...
Conservative Californians Noticing a Strange Trend With THEIR Mail-In Ballots and It Ain't...
Platner Ex-Campaign Boss Drops Bombshell WaPo Op-Ed: 'I Know Firsthand Why He Shouldn't...
'They Claim to Fight Hate But Sow Division’: MLK’s Niece Shreds SPLC in...
NO ONE Is Talking to YOU, Obama Bro: Meghan McCain Makes Tommy Vietor...

Justice Clarence Thomas Argues That 'Gender-Affirming Care' Is Sex Discrimination

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court has been hearing arguments Wednesday on the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on "gender-affirming care" for minors. Justice Sonia Sotomayor likened sex-change surgery to taking an aspirin: "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking aspirin," she argued. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shocked listeners today when she compared child sex change restrictions to bans on interracial marriages.

Advertisement

Fortunately, there was some common sense from Justice Samuel Alito who argued that civil rights are based on immutable human traits, so if gender is fluid and changing, it's not immutable.

Our favorite justice, Clarence Thomas, also came in with a "killer question."

Strangio said the plaintiff (a girl who identifies as a boy) would be allowed to get drugs for "a typical male puberty" despite having a "birth sex [of] female." That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is...sex discrimination!  Genius.

Good one.

Advertisement

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement