Mayor Pete's Latest Brainwave: Amend the Constitution to Strip Corporations of Free Speech...
Minneapolis Chaos: Conservative Jake Lang Stabbed in Mob Assault – 'The Tolerant Left'...
Eric Swalwell Says That as Governor, He Will Revoke ICE Agents' Driver's Licenses
Democrat Activist Fear Mongers The SAVE Act, Senator Mike Lee Is Having None...
When Will Gov. Tim 'There's Too Many Damn Guns on the Street' Walz...
No, Jim Acosta, We Do Not Care Where You Eat, You Raging Narcissist...
State Department Announces It Will Terminate All Foreign Aid to Somalia
Gov. Abigail Spanberger Says She Will Stand By Hard-Working, Law-Abiding Immigrant Neighbo...
Pro-Illegal Groups Advise Against Blowing Whistles So as Not to Trigger Trauma Responses...
Minnesota DFL Party Trips Over an Old Tweet About Trump While Slamming DOJ...
Video of BBC Reporter Trying to Lecture Elon Musk About 'Misinformation' Has Aged...
Fake Historian Jon Meacham Complains About Losing the 'Ethos of Omaha Beach and...
Can President Trump Make Minneapolis Great Again?
Bill Melugin Profiles a Few More MN 'Neighbors' Tim Walz and Jacob Frey...
Scott Jennings Recommends Watching This Video of a CNN Guest's Rant About Trump...

Justice Clarence Thomas Argues That 'Gender-Affirming Care' Is Sex Discrimination

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File

The Supreme Court has been hearing arguments Wednesday on the constitutionality of Tennessee's ban on "gender-affirming care" for minors. Justice Sonia Sotomayor likened sex-change surgery to taking an aspirin: "Every medical treatment has risk. Even taking aspirin," she argued. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shocked listeners today when she compared child sex change restrictions to bans on interracial marriages.

Advertisement

Fortunately, there was some common sense from Justice Samuel Alito who argued that civil rights are based on immutable human traits, so if gender is fluid and changing, it's not immutable.

Our favorite justice, Clarence Thomas, also came in with a "killer question."

Strangio said the plaintiff (a girl who identifies as a boy) would be allowed to get drugs for "a typical male puberty" despite having a "birth sex [of] female." That answer made clear that girls who identify as boys would get a right under the Constitution to testosterone, but boys who identify as boys would not, which is...sex discrimination!  Genius.

Good one.

Advertisement

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement